Tech
World in hand
(Getty Images)
BIGGER NUMBER BETTER

Apple’s Services division and Meta’s Reality Labs are reminders of how dominant Big Tech really is

Both are mind-boggling, for different reasons.

This week, a number of Big Tech stocks reminded us just how dominant they really are. Yes, we used to balk at the thought of having a trillion-dollar company — now we have nine — but market valuations are only one way of contextualizing the sheer size of the BATMMAAN stocks.

Two divisions, both central to the future of their respective companies, Apple’s Services business and Meta’s Reality Labs division, offer another perspective.

Beyond the core

In its Q4 earnings, Apple revealed that, just as many reports had suggested, the latest AI-powered iPhone wasn’t proving as much of a pull for consumers as CEO Tim Cook would probably like, with sales down nearly 1% in its all-important holiday quarter. What is working at Apple, however, is its Services business, which clocked more than $26 billion in sales as the company topped 1 billion total subscriptions for things like Apple Music, TV+, iCloud, and more.

Apple Services
Sherwood News

To put that figure in context, if Apple’s Services division were a stand-alone business, let’s call it iServe, it would be the 37th-largest company in the S&P 500 Index by revenue. It would be more than double the size of Netflix or Uber. It would be more lucrative than consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble, larger than Disney, and would even outmatch Tesla in terms of pure revenue.

Perhaps most remarkable: it would be bigger than Coca-Cola and Nike combined.
Apple Services
Sherwood News

Now, moving on to Meta...

Reality check

Back in 2014, Facebook made its two largest acquisitions ever in just around a month’s time. The first was messaging giant WhatsApp, and the other was a small VR headset startup called Oculus. For the latter's potential to “create the most social platform ever,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg shelled out $2 billion.

That seemed like a lot of money at the time.

But since Facebook became Meta, Reality Labs, the augmented and virtual reality arm which expanded from Oculus, has lost the company a total of ~$60 billion since 2020.

To put that number in context, we’ll use Boeing, a company that’s been plagued by safety issues, union battles, scandals, and management change, and has reported six straight years of net losses. The sum total of those losses? A mere $35.7 billion — still 40% less cash than Reality Labs has burned through.

Reality Labs Losses
Sherwood News

Of course, Meta can afford to blow $60 billion on Reality Labs, as its “Family of Apps” division reported more than $260 billion in profit over the same period.

An obvious follow-up question: is Zuck’s “long-term investment” worth the burn? Well, on the plus side, Meta does continue to lead the VR/AR market with a 70% share, with the social media giant selling 3 million units of its latest Quest 3 through the first three quarters of the device’s launch, way ahead of Apple’s Vision Pro. 

Indeed, Meta’s leadership seems as keen as ever to pour cash into the business this year, with the company reportedly integrating Reality Labs more closely with its core functions and vowing 2025 will be “a pivotal year for the metaverse.” Meta is expected to spend $65 billion on capex in this year alone, thanks to the company’s cash-intensive AI ambitions.

More Tech

See all Tech
South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

tech

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

tech

Tesla used skewed data in push for European FSD approval, Reuters finds

Tesla has used highly questionable safety stats in an effort to win over European regulators and rekindle sales in the region, according to a Reuters investigation.

Tesla reportedly pitched regulators in Sweden and the Netherlands with claims that its Full Self-Driving (FSD) tech is over 7x safer than human drivers. However, independent researchers told Reuters that the stats are misleading because Tesla compares airbag-deployment crashes involving FSD-equipped vehicles with much broader US crash statistics, while also benchmarking newer Teslas against the entire US vehicle fleet, which is significantly older on average.

Despite the flawed metrics, the Dutch regulator approved FSD in April, saying its decision was based on its own “tests, analyses and verifications,” and Tesla is now pushing for EU-wide clearance. A version of FSD is currently available in five European markets.

Despite the flawed metrics, the Dutch regulator approved FSD in April, saying its decision was based on its own “tests, analyses and verifications,” and Tesla is now pushing for EU-wide clearance. A version of FSD is currently available in five European markets.

tech
Rani Molla

Report: Microsoft weighs Xbox spin-off amid major overhaul

Microsoft is reportedly considering spinning out or restructuring its struggling Xbox unit, per The Information. While new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, who took over in February, is preparing for layoffs, shes simultaneously planning to boost investment in its biggest franchises like “Halo,” “Fallout,” and “Minecraft.”

The latest potential shake-up comes as the gaming division battles major headwinds, following a massive 33% plunge in Q3 console sales and a recent move to slash Game Pass prices while removing new Call of Duty titles.

The latest potential shake-up comes as the gaming division battles major headwinds, following a massive 33% plunge in Q3 console sales and a recent move to slash Game Pass prices while removing new Call of Duty titles.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.