Power
US-DNA-TESTING
(Eric Baradat/Getty Images)

What Regeneron’s purchase of 23andMe means for the millions of people’s DNA it now owns

Experts say the deal is a “best-case scenario” in a world where privacy protections are lax.

J. Edward Moreno
5/20/25 7:58AM

A pharmaceutical company that specializes in making DNA-based research agreed to buy 23andMe out of bankruptcy, averting a worst-case scenario as the genetic data of millions of consumers was auctioned off.

Regeneron bought 23andMe for $256 million, the company announced Monday morning. Leading up to the deal, millions of consumers who mailed 23andMe vials of their saliva to learn about their ancestry worried about where their genetic data might end up, so much so that it led to a spike in web traffic to the company’s website to delete their data.

Moving the data to the hands of a pharmaceutical company rather than to a surveillance tech firm, private equity, or data brokers should ostensibly make its customers feel better. Regeneron said it would maintain 23andMe’s privacy policy, which in theory keeps consumers’ data as safe as it was before.

But that’s not saying much, according to Anya Prince, a law professor at the University of Iowa.

“From what we have heard and seen, Regeneron is more like 23andMe in terms of how they might steward the data,” Prince said. “So, in that way it’s the best-case scenario, but there’s not any guarantees in how they will do that going forward.”

For one, 23andMe’s privacy policy is subject to change at any time. Suzanne Bernstein, counsel at the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center, said the bankruptcy highlights how few protections consumers have over their health data.

“When a consumer purchased their 23andMe kit, they could not have envisioned or meaningfully consented to their genetic sample being sold outside of that context,” Bernstein said. “The fact that this highly sensitive data is being sold for profit at all brings up some ethical questions.”

How may Regeneron use that data?

While Regeneron is at the forefront of genetic-based research for drugs and therapies, its most lucrative products were actually not discovered through genetics-driven drug discovery. Eylea, which prevents blindness in some patients, and its COVID-19 antibody cocktail are two of its highest-selling products, and they were not discovered through genetic research.

Still, genetic and health data is highly valuable. Advertising firms may use it to get a more pointed profile of a consumer, or government contractors could use it to track down or surveil civilians. (At $256 million, Regeneron scored each of the estimated 15 million users’ genetic data at $17 a pop, 404 Media noted.)

Bernstein said that consumers might assume their genetic information is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, but that doesn’t apply to direct-to-consumer companies like 23andMe. Notably, Regeneron plans to keep 23andMe operating despite its dwindling sales.

“I don’t think they’re trying to emulate 23andMe’s business model; it’s more so that it seems to be an avenue to continue collecting genetic information,” she said.

More Power

See all Power
power

Draft Senate bill gives AI companies a two-year pass on federal regulation, Bloomberg reports

Bloomberg reports that a draft bill from Senator Ted Cruz would give AI companies a two-year pass from any federal regulation when they apply to be part of a White House-controlled “regulatory sandbox.” Such a regulatory framework frees participating companies from federal agency oversight while simultaneously handing President Trump broad powers to shape a still nascent and increasingly powerful industry.

The draft bill allows companies approved for the waiver to request renewals for up to eight years, according to the report.

The fast-moving generative-AI boom that took the tech world by storm was kicked off by the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT less than three years ago. A potential decade free of federal regulations would be a huge win for companies like Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Amazon.

In July, the US Senate voted 99-1 to kill a planned provision from President Trump’s massive tax bill that would have prevented any state from regulating AI for 10 years.

The fast-moving generative-AI boom that took the tech world by storm was kicked off by the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT less than three years ago. A potential decade free of federal regulations would be a huge win for companies like Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Amazon.

In July, the US Senate voted 99-1 to kill a planned provision from President Trump’s massive tax bill that would have prevented any state from regulating AI for 10 years.

power

Airbus faces a 10-day strike from UK workers, mirroring Boeing’s labor strife

Thousands of UK union Airbus workers plan to strike for 10 days in September amid a contract dispute.

The union workers build wings for Airbus’ commercial jets, threatening a production slowdown for the European plane maker.

As Airbus’ labor tension builds, rival Boeing’s has already boiled over: earlier this month, more than 3,000 Boeing workers who build military aircraft started a strike that remains ongoing. The action came less than a year after the company faced a two-month stoppage from a machinist strike.

Airbus, for now, says it doesn’t see the strikes affecting full-year deliveries.

As Airbus’ labor tension builds, rival Boeing’s has already boiled over: earlier this month, more than 3,000 Boeing workers who build military aircraft started a strike that remains ongoing. The action came less than a year after the company faced a two-month stoppage from a machinist strike.

Airbus, for now, says it doesn’t see the strikes affecting full-year deliveries.

power
Rani Molla
8/20/25

Elon Musk’s political party isn’t happening, as Tesla CEO gives up on the “America Party”

In July, Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced his own political party, the America Party — a move intended to “give you back your freedom.” What it did at the time was invoke the wrath of President Donald Trump and send the stock down.

A month and a half later, The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Musk is “pumping the brakes” on his third party.

According to the Journal, “Musk has told allies that he wants to focus his attention on his companies and is reluctant to alienate powerful Republicans by starting a third party that could siphon off GOP voters.” He also wants to maintain ties with Vice President JD Vance, the presumptive Republican presidential candidate for 2028.

What happened?

For one, earlier this month Tesla’s board approved a roughly $30 billion interim pay package that Musk will only realize if he remains at the company for two years.

The stock isn’t moving on the news so far, but investors and analysts typically see Musk’s focus on his public company as a good thing.

According to the Journal, “Musk has told allies that he wants to focus his attention on his companies and is reluctant to alienate powerful Republicans by starting a third party that could siphon off GOP voters.” He also wants to maintain ties with Vice President JD Vance, the presumptive Republican presidential candidate for 2028.

What happened?

For one, earlier this month Tesla’s board approved a roughly $30 billion interim pay package that Musk will only realize if he remains at the company for two years.

The stock isn’t moving on the news so far, but investors and analysts typically see Musk’s focus on his public company as a good thing.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.