Power
Luigi Mangione Attends Hearing In State Court In New York City
Luigi Mangione arrives at a hearing for the murder of UHC CEO Brian Thompson (Curtis Means-Pool/Getty Images)

Healthcare companies massively upped their spending on executive security in 2024

In 2024, UnitedHealth reported spending $1.7 million protecting its C-suite, up from $0 the previous year.

In 2023, the nations largest insurance company did not report spending any money on personal security costs for its executives.

On December 4, Brian Thompson, the former CEO of UnitedHealths insurance arm, was shot dead in Manhattan. The words delay, deny, and depose — phrases commonly used to deny claims — were inscribed on the bullets used to kill him.

In 2024, UnitedHealth reported spending $1.7 million protecting its C-suite, according to a proxy statement filed April 21.

Many healthcare companies upped their spending on executive security in 2024, per the proxy statements filed so far. This comes as Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing Thompson, has garnered support from many Americans frustrated and angry with the for-profit healthcare industry.

By the looks of it, more healthcare firms arent taking any chances with their leaderships safety. CVS Health, which owns the insurer Aetna, spent over $293,151 on executive security, up from $44,148 in 2023. Elevance Health, previously known as Anthem, spent $129,600 on executive security in 2024, up from a meager $1,485 in 2023.

Companies vary in how they report security costs. Generally, the Securities and Exchange Commission requires disclosure of executive security benefits that exceed $10,000.

Unlike its peers, Cigna, the nations fourth-largest insurer, did not break out how much it spends on executive security. It said it does not consider security costs a form of compensation, but rather “directly related to the performance of their executive duties.”

Cigna, which also didnt disclose that information in its annual report, didnt immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did UnitedHealth, Cigna, or Elevance.

Centene, an insurance company that focuses on managing government-sponsored programs, reported spending over $200,000 on executive security compared to none reported in 2023. The company also said it would have enhanced security at its annual shareholder meeting, banning all bags that arent see-through.

Even Hims & Hers, which generally works outside of the insurance framework, reported reimbursing its CEO $180,000 for a home security system.

As for Moderna and Pfizer, this isnt their first rodeo. The two companies were tapped by the government to quickly develop COVID-19 jabs, which led to pushback and threats to its executives from vaccine skeptics. Both companies have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on executive security since 2019.

More Power

See all Power
power

Trump’s deal offering top Nvidia chips to China was nixed at last minute, the WSJ reports

Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, really wants to sell the chipmakers most powerful Blackwell GPUs to China. He almost had his way.

According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, President Trump was ready to put Blackwell chips on the negotiating table for his meeting with Chinese President Xi to seek relief from Chinas decision to block crucial rare earth exports to the US.

But according to the report, Trump advisers presented a unified front and were able to dissuade him from giving up the most powerful chips to China at the last minute. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were among those opposed to the chip deal. After the meeting, Trump said he did not talk with Xi about Nvidia’s “super duper” chips.

Reportedly those opposed to the deal cited national security concerns, as well as wanting to keep a competitive edge as China seeks to challenge the US’s current dominance of the AI industry.

But according to the report, Trump advisers presented a unified front and were able to dissuade him from giving up the most powerful chips to China at the last minute. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were among those opposed to the chip deal. After the meeting, Trump said he did not talk with Xi about Nvidia’s “super duper” chips.

Reportedly those opposed to the deal cited national security concerns, as well as wanting to keep a competitive edge as China seeks to challenge the US’s current dominance of the AI industry.

power

OK, so when was the longest shutdown in US history?

The US government officially shut down at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday after senators failed to agree on a last-minute funding bill. Though initially shrugging off the threat of a shutdown during yesterday’s session, stocks were mildly in the red on Wednesday as investors reacted to what is now the 11th shutdown in the government’s history.

Until this latest shutdown, there had been 20 government funding gaps experienced since 1976 — though not all ended in a full shutdown, with full closure averted in half of those cases.

Indeed, prior to the 1980s, funding gaps didn’t typically have major effects on government operations, with agencies continuing to operate on the basis that the funding would come eventually. However, a more stringent interpretation of the rules led to a stricter appropriations process from the early 1980s onward, with many subsequent funding gaps resulting in a shutdown of affected agencies (unless the gaps were quickly fixed or occurred over a weekend).

Obviously, the duration of the latest shutdown is still unclear, but it will continue until Congress passes a funding bill — most likely via a “continuing resolution,” which has ended every shutdown since 1990. Data analyzed by USAFacts suggest that it might not be a one- or two-day affair, as funding gaps have lengthened in recent years.

Government shutdown patterns
Sherwood News

Indeed, the last shutdown, which began in December 2018, ended up becoming the longest in history, at a whopping 34 days. By the time the government reopened in January 2019, about $3 billion (in 2019 dollars) had been wiped from the GDP in Q4, per data from the Congressional Budget Office, with approximately $18 billion in “federal discretionary spending” delayed over the roughly five-week stretch.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.