Markets
Man's Head and Arrows
(Getty Images)

Managing futures risk: Understanding how much you stand to make or lose

The leverage futures offer can cut both ways.

Toby Bochan

Welcome to Sherwood’s deep dive into futures markets, presented in partnership with CME Logo


In this guide, we’ll help you understand how to manage futures risk. While we’ve previously discussed leverage as one of the benefits of trading futures, it’s important to remember that leverage is a double-edged sword. When things go your way, futures can seem like a money multiplier, but when the market moves in the opposite direction of your futures trade, you stand to lose even more. And the bigger the swing, the bigger the risk.

We hope it all goes the right way every time, but the best way to approach risk management with futures is not to ask, “How much could I profit if all goes as I think it will,” but rather, “How much do I stand to lose if all goes wrong?” 

Get Your News

Subscribe and thrive

scoreboard logo

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Let’s look at how things could go after you’ve decided to buy that first futures contract. We’ll stick with the previous oil example, which has once again become quite topical. You believe oil is cheap and is about to soar due to geopolitical tensions, so you buy one crude oil futures contract for $60, add $6,000 to your account for the margin requirement, and wait for that liquid gold to work its magic.

The first day, the price goes up $0.10. The tick size for crude oil is 0.01, so it’s gone up 10 ticks, increasing your contract’s notional value to $60,100 — a nice $100 growth in your position. You can see how futures really magnify gains: $0.10 becomes $100! 

The next day, OPEC+ announces it’s massively outperformed with oil production, and the price of oil sinks to $55. Yikes! That’s 600 ticks down, or a loss of $6,000 from the notional value from the previous day. So you see how movements are magnified both for the upside as well as the downside.

Depending on the margin requirements — some brokerages call for a different amount for “maintenance margin” rather than opening margin — a trader may have to deposit more into their account at the end of the trading session, which is what’s referred to as a margin call.

My favorite example of how things can go absolutely wrong is from the 1983 movie Trading Places,” in which the Duke brothers trade orange juice futures on insider information (which wasn’t even illegal at the time!), but are tricked into trading on incorrect information planted by Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd’s characters. Because they believe they know the actual future, they place outsized bets that the price of orange juice will soar, without worrying about the consequences of what will happen if there’s a bumper crop. As the actual data is revealed, the price drops from $1.42 to just $0.29, resulting in a margin call of $394 million to cover the monumental difference between their contracts and the current price. The Duke brothers do not have that much cash, so they are bankrupted. If you want to go deeper into the math, this post does a great job of figuring it all out

While what happened to the Dukes in 1983 couldn’t happen in 2025 the same way, it’s still important to employ tactics to manage your risk exposure. 

Some tools to manage risk include:

  • Employing stop-loss orders: Probably the two most important things to set up as you implement your futures strategy are both up and down limit orders for the contract that represent your risk tolerance — for example, a sell order if it hits 10% up or 8% down from your initial position. 

  • Managing your position size: This could be through buying fewer contracts or by buying micro or mini versions of the same underlying commodity. For instance, Micro WTI Crude Oil represents one-tenth the size of a standard WTI Crude Oil contract, so one $60 contract’s notional value is $6,000 instead of $60,000.  

  • Diversification: Just as you wouldn’t put 100% of your stock portfolio in a single equity or even a single sector, your futures portfolio should include different sectors and classes. 

It’s also important to maintain discipline both when you’re winning and on the losing side: it’s easy to get caught up in “streaks” and feel like you’re carried by magic into piles of winning trades that persuade you to throw caution to the wind and make plays outside your usual approach. Similarly, fears of losing money shouldn’t make you exit positions early if you’ve set up a strategy that may still trend in your favor. 

Basically, your decisions shouldn’t stem from fear, greed, or FOMO, and don’t put yourself into a position where you could lose more than you can afford.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Michael Burry flags “troubling” jump in Nvidia’s supply commitments

The Big Short investor Michael Burry — famous for betting against the 2008 housing bubble — just warned of a major risk in Nvidia’s latest annual report, pointing to a sixfold surge in purchase obligations over the past year.

In a Substack post Thursday, Burry called the increase from $16.1 billion to $95.2 billion in just 12 months troubling, noting that Nvidia has been forced to place noncancelable purchase orders well before knowing the final demand for its AI chips. The surge is partly tied to supplier TSMC requiring longer-term contracts, he added.

markets

Vistra beats Q4 earnings expectations for adjusted EBITDA, but dips on income decline

Power provider Vistra, a key player in the AI energy trade, reported better-than-expected adjusted earnings results early Thursday, but shares dipped in early trading as Q4 net income dropped.

The Texas-based company, which supplies nuclear- and natural gas-fueled power to wholesale and retail markets, reported:

  • Net income of $233 million, a decline of 52% from Q4 2024.

  • Adjusted EBITDA from ongoing operations of $1.74 billion vs. the $1.71 billion expected by Wall Street analysts.

  • Vistra maintained previously issued guidance for full-year EBITDA from ongoing operations and adjusted free cash flow from ongoing operations.

Vistra shares soared 258% in 2024 amid a flurry of excitement over the AI energy boom. Last year was more muted, with the stock rising 17%. So far in 2026, shares were up roughly 9% before the report.

  • Net income of $233 million, a decline of 52% from Q4 2024.

  • Adjusted EBITDA from ongoing operations of $1.74 billion vs. the $1.71 billion expected by Wall Street analysts.

  • Vistra maintained previously issued guidance for full-year EBITDA from ongoing operations and adjusted free cash flow from ongoing operations.

Vistra shares soared 258% in 2024 amid a flurry of excitement over the AI energy boom. Last year was more muted, with the stock rising 17%. So far in 2026, shares were up roughly 9% before the report.

markets

Sandisk rises on partnership with SK Hynix to standardize memory chip architecture tailored for AI data centers

Sandisk is up 3% in premarket trading on Thursday after it began its global standardization strategy of high-bandwidth flash (HBF) memory solutions with SK Hynix.

SK Hynix commented in a press release on Thursday that by making HBF an industry standard, together with Sandisk, we will lay the foundation for the entire AI ecosystem to grow together,” adding that the companies will set up a dedicated workstream to work on the standardization under the Open Compute Project, the world’s largest organization dealing with data center technologies.

First debuted last February, Sandisk’s HBF technology lies in between ultrafast high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and high-capacity SSDs. That is, these have more storage capacity than HBMs, but are still fast enough to be utilized in AI inferencing (albeit not as quick as HBM).

Sandisk has previously argued that this hybrid architecture is central to AI services that need user applications but require a significant amount of fast interconnect between GPUs. The latest announcement also notes that HBF technology is expected to be more cost-efficient compared to alternatives of similar scale.

The launch, which was shared in an kickoff event on Thursday evening, starts SK Hynix and Sandisk’s workflow, which was announced when the two companies signed a memorandum of understanding “to standardize the specification, define technology requirements and explore the creation of a technology ecosystem” last August, per Sandisk’s press release at the time. Ultimately, by collaborating with SK Hynix, one of the three key HBM suppliers, to standardize and commercialize the technology, Sandisk is manufacturing somewhat of a first-mover advantage to offer the system-level “AI-optimized memory architecture” required for AI inference markets, rather than focusing on the performance of a single chip element.

markets

Warner Bros. reports deeper-than-expected Q4 loss amid its bidding war

Warner Bros. Discovery reported its fourth-quarter earnings before the market opened on Thursday. The results come as the company finds itself in the middle of a still-hot bidding war between Netflix and Paramount. Its shares were flat in premarket trading.

In the three months ended in December, WBD reported:

  • A loss of $0.10 per share, deeper than the $0.03 loss expected by analysts polled by FactSet.

  • Total revenue of $9.46 billion, ahead of the $9.35 billion consensus.

Warner Bros.’ cable business booked $4.2 billion in revenue, beating estimates of $4.04 billion but down 12% from last year. The division is a key difference between the Netflix and Paramount acquisition offers: Netflix is seeking to acquire everything except Warner’s cable networks, while Paramount is seeking to purchase WBD in its entirety.

Industry analysts mostly view WBD’s cable networks as being worth between $2 and $4 per share, and Paramount’s most recent bid is $3.25 per share more than Netflix’s. Paramount has said its own analysis values Warner’s cable division at $0 per share.

WBD said it would not answer any questions about the two proposals on Thursday’s earnings call, but noted the following about Paramount’s recent offer:

“There can be no assurance that the Board will conclude that the transaction proposed by PSKY is superior to the merger with Netflix or that any definitive agreement or transaction will result from Warner Bros. Discovery’s discussions with PSKY.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.