Tech
Roadrunner and Wile E Coyote
The never-ending chase (BSR Agency/Getty Images)
MEEP-MEEP

YouTuber runs a Tesla through a fake wall to poke a hole in its camera-only, no-lidar strategy

The Tesla ran straight into a wall painted to look like its surroundings. A non-Tesla with lidar stopped easily.

Jon Keegan

In the classic “Looney Tunes” cartoons, the Road Runner is constantly evading capture by the tireless Wile E. Coyote, who sets elaborate (and fruitless) traps to snare the clever bird. One of the most famous tricks Wile E. conjured was to paint a fake tunnel on a rock wall, hoping the Road Runner’s eyes would be fooled and he would smash into the wall.

It turns out this trick appears to work on Teslas.

Former NASA engineer turned YouTuber Mark Rober published a new video over the weekend that tests a camera-only Tesla against a lidar-equipped vehicle to see how the Tesla’s “autopilot” braking system responds to the optical illusion of a wall thats camouflaged to look like a seamless view of the road ahead.

About 10 years ago, as CEO Elon Musk was seeking to cut down on the costs of Teslas, he make a radical decision to use only visible-light cameras for monitoring objects in the road ahead, as opposed to the more costly, but more accurate, lidar systems. Lidar (light detection and ranging) — which is used on Alphabet’s Waymo self-driving cars — shoots out infrared lasers that can detect objects in the dark, through fog, and in other conditions that would obstruct visible light.

At the time, Musk defended his decision to go all in with visible light cameras by pointing to the power of AI to detect pretty much any object on the road, thanks to its firehose of training data, which it collects from millions of connected Tesla vehicles on the road.

But recent reports have called attention to what appear to be failings of the camera-only system in a series of accidents that have led to multiple injuries and even a death.

Rober’s video presents an easy-to-understand, powerful illustration of Tesla’s potential limitations when it encounters such obstructions in the road. Rober’s tests also showed that the camera-only system had a hard time seeing a dummy of a child in heavy fog and a deluge of water (which, to be fair, you would probably never experience unless you were driving under a waterfall, similar to the idea that you probably won’t encounter a wall thats painted to look like its surroundings).

Rober’s Tesla did stop safely in a few of his tests. It stopped when a stationary child dummy was in the center of the road in plain daylight, when the dummy popped out from behind a vehicle, and when the dummy was backlit with extremely bright floodlights.

Tesla has been on a downswing of late, as the stock has lost half its value in the past three months, sales are dropping alarmingly in Europe, and Musk’s DOGE side quest appears to be consuming all of his time and attention.

Tesla shares were down more than 5% today.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Anthropic projections for 2028: Up to $70 billion in revenue, could be profitable by 2027

Anthropic’s Claude API business is doing so well with enterprise customers, the company is upping its revenue forecasts significantly. According to a report from The Information, the company’s robust corporate sales have caused it to revise its most optimistic forecast up to $70 billion in sales by 2028.

Anthropic estimates its API business will be double that of OpenAI’s API sales. OpenAI is currently burning through much more money per month than Anthropic, and reportedly expects to spend as much as $115 billion through 2029, while Anthropic is forecasting that it could be cash positive by 2027, per the report.

Anthropic estimates its API business will be double that of OpenAI’s API sales. OpenAI is currently burning through much more money per month than Anthropic, and reportedly expects to spend as much as $115 billion through 2029, while Anthropic is forecasting that it could be cash positive by 2027, per the report.

tech

Amazon, which is developing AI shopping agents, doesn’t want Perplexity’s AI shopping agents on its site

Amazon has sent a cease and desist letter to Perplexity AI, demanding that it stop letting its AI browser agent, Comet, make online purchases for users, Bloomberg reports.

Amazon, which is developing its own AI shopping agents and is having “conversations” with builders of third-party agents, accused the AI startup of “committing computer fraud by failing to disclose when its AI agent is shopping on a user’s behalf, in violation of Amazon’s terms of service.”

Perplexity, in response, said Amazon is attempting to “eliminate user rights” in order to sell more ads.

Amazon, which is developing its own AI shopping agents and is having “conversations” with builders of third-party agents, accused the AI startup of “committing computer fraud by failing to disclose when its AI agent is shopping on a user’s behalf, in violation of Amazon’s terms of service.”

Perplexity, in response, said Amazon is attempting to “eliminate user rights” in order to sell more ads.

tech

Apple to challenge Google Chromebooks with low-cost Mac laptop, Bloomberg reports

Apple is designing a new sub-$1,000 Mac laptop aimed at the education market, Bloomberg reports.

Google’s low-cost Chromebooks currently dominate the K-12 education market, and Apple’s reentry into the education market that it once owned could disrupt the sectors status quo.

According to the report, Apple plans on using the custom mobile chips it currently uses in iPhones to power the more affordable devices.

Apple’s recent earnings demonstrated that iPhone sales have been steady, and the tech giant is looking to find new areas of growth, like services. A low-cost Mac could be popular with consumers, in addition to education buyers.

According to the report, Apple plans on using the custom mobile chips it currently uses in iPhones to power the more affordable devices.

Apple’s recent earnings demonstrated that iPhone sales have been steady, and the tech giant is looking to find new areas of growth, like services. A low-cost Mac could be popular with consumers, in addition to education buyers.

tech

Getty Images suffers partial defeat in UK lawsuit against Stability AI

Stability AI, the creator of image generation tool Stable Diffusion, largely defended itself from a copyright violation lawsuit filed by Getty Images, which alleged the company illegally trained its AI models on Getty’s image library.

Lacking strong enough evidence, Getty dropped the part of the case alleging illegal training mid-trial, according to Reuters reporting.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.