Tech
Elon Musk Gulf of America hat
Hats off to you, Mr. Musk (Jim Watson/Getty Images)

Why the proposed end of EV tax credits could actually be a big win for Tesla

That’s because vehicles assembled in America might be getting their own tax break.

Rani Molla

The $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles will likely be out by year’s end, according to a markup of a proposal by the House Ways and Means Committee published yesterday that’s expected to be incorporated into President Trump’s “one big, beautiful bill.”

That would seem like bad news for electric vehicle makers, who rely on the credit to subsidize some of the higher price of purchasing EVs, but maybe not as much for Tesla.

When asked about how rolling back the Biden-era tax credits might affect his company during an earnings call last July, CEO Elon Musk said something sort of incomprehensible:

“I guess there would be like some impact. But I think it would be devastating for our competitors and would hurt Tesla slightly. But long term, probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

He didn’t explain why that might be, but he might actually be right.

Tesla buyers are less likely than other EV owners to say they wouldn’t have made their purchase without the federal tax credit, according to survey data of EV owners by insurance comparison website Insurify this year. While more than half of Toyota EV owners said so, only about a third of Tesla owners did.

Additionally, the proposed legislation introduces a tax deduction for car loan interest for passenger vehicles assembled in the US, which is the case for Tesla. That could save typical car buyers on average $4,500 over the course of their loan, depending on the car they buy and the interest rate they get. (Or, conversely, much less than that.)

Of course, the same goes for Bezos-backed Cybertruck competitor Slate Auto, which like Tesla is also set to be assembled in the US. Unlike Tesla, its starting price of less than $28,000 is relatively affordable to begin with, even without the tax credit.

Tesla, however, has much bigger problems than the federal tax credit reversal, like slowing demand — as evidenced by declining sales, a week-long labor pause, and confirmation from Tesla employees themselves.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Meta projected 10% of 2024 revenue came from scams and banned goods, Reuters reports

Meta has been making billions of dollars per year from scam ads and sales of banned goods, according internal Meta documents seen by Reuters.

The new report quantifies the scale of fraud taking place on Meta’s platforms, and how much the company profited from them.

Per the report, Meta internal projections from late last year said that 10% of the company’s total 2024 revenue would come from scammy ads and sales of banned goods — which works out to $16 billion.

Discussions within Meta acknowledged the steep fines likely to be levied against the company for not stopping the fraudulent behavior on its platforms, and the company prioritized enforcement in regions where the penalties would be steepest, the reporting found. The cost of lost revenue from clamping down on the scams was weighed against the cost of fines from regulators.

The documents reportedly show that Meta did aim to significantly reduce the fraudulent behavior, but cuts to its moderation team left the vast majority of user-reported violations to be ignored or rejected.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters the documents were a “selective view” of internal enforcement:

“We aggressively fight fraud and scams because people on our platforms don’t want this content, legitimate advertisers don’t want it, and we don’t want it either.”

Per the report, Meta internal projections from late last year said that 10% of the company’s total 2024 revenue would come from scammy ads and sales of banned goods — which works out to $16 billion.

Discussions within Meta acknowledged the steep fines likely to be levied against the company for not stopping the fraudulent behavior on its platforms, and the company prioritized enforcement in regions where the penalties would be steepest, the reporting found. The cost of lost revenue from clamping down on the scams was weighed against the cost of fines from regulators.

The documents reportedly show that Meta did aim to significantly reduce the fraudulent behavior, but cuts to its moderation team left the vast majority of user-reported violations to be ignored or rejected.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters the documents were a “selective view” of internal enforcement:

“We aggressively fight fraud and scams because people on our platforms don’t want this content, legitimate advertisers don’t want it, and we don’t want it either.”

$350B

Google wants to invest even more money into Anthropic, with the search giant in talks for a new funding round that could value the AI startup at $350 billion, Business Insider reports. That’s about double its valuation from two months ago, but still shy of competitor OpenAI’s $500 billion valuation.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, Business Insider said the new deal “could also take the form of a strategic investment where Google provides additional cloud computing services to Anthropic, a convertible note, or a priced funding round early next year.”

In October, Google, which has a 14% stake in Anthropic, announced that it had inked a deal worth “tens of billions” for Anthropic to access Google’s AI compute to train and serve its Claude model.

tech

Apple to pay Google $1 billion a year for access to AI model for Siri

Apple plans to pay Google about $1 billion a year to use the search giant’s AI model for Siri, Bloomberg reports. Google’s model — at 1.2 trillion parameters — is way bigger than Apple’s current models.

The deal aims to help the iPhone maker improve its lagging AI efforts, powering a new Siri slated to come out this spring.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.