Tech
Senate bipartisan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Insight Forum on Capitol Hill in Washington
Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg at an AI forum on Capitol Hill in 2023. (Elizabeth Frantz for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

A tale of two capex increases: Why investors are responding to Google and Meta so differently

Two big tech companies posted stellar earnings and upped their capex forecasts. One stock is up, one is down.

When Alphabet and Meta reported first-quarter earnings on Wednesday, both exceeded already high expectations on revenue and profit — and both said their already massive AI spending will climb even higher. The Google parent raised its 2026 capital expenditure outlook to between $180 billion and $190 billion, up from $175 billion to $185 billion. Meta, meanwhile, increased its 2026 capex forecast even more, up to $125 billion to $145 billion, from $115 billion to $135 billion.

Investors reacted very differently: Alphabet shares are up about 6% premarket, while Meta has fallen roughly 9%.

So, why the different reactions? While there are a number of reasons — Google’s earnings beat was better — perhaps it’s best illustrated by their approach to AI infrastructure: Google is not only making high-end Tensor Processing Unit AI chips for internal use, but it also confirmed that it will begin delivering those chips to other companies this year, in what analysts have estimated could be a $900 billion business. Meta is reportedly already among its customers.

In other words, Google is positioning itself to profit from the broader AI ecosystem, including its rivals. Meta, meanwhile, is building inference-optimized chips primarily to lower its own costs. While Meta remains largely a renter of infrastructure, Google is becoming a landlord.

Nowhere is that clearer than in Google Cloud, where revenue grew 63% to over $20 billion last quarter, providing a massive engine to offset its infrastructure bills — a luxury that Meta’s business model lacks.

Although Meta has been angling for new revenue sources, one of its most promising paths was recently destroyed, thanks to the Chinese government blocking its acquisition of AI agent startup Manus. And while its own advertising business is surging thanks to AI, it’s less clear if that ad bump alone can justify its massive $145 billion infrastructure bill.

When Morgan Stanley's Brian Nowak asked which signposts Meta is watching to ensure Return on Invested Capital, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg demurred.

“That’s a very technical question,” he said, before continuing.

“The things that we’re watching are to make sure that we’re on track building leading models and leading products,” Zuckerberg said. “The formula for our company has always been: build experiences that can get to billions of people and focus on monetizing them once you get to scale.”

Meta, of course, has scale, but even that is looking shaky these days. The company reported that daily active users across its family of apps dipped for the first time since 2019.

Alphabet's leadership was far more direct when asked about its own capex climbing through 2027.

“You've seen us over the past several years increase CapEx every year, and we have done it very thoughtfully to meet the demand that we are seeing, both from external customers as well as demands across the organization,” CFO Anat Ashkenazi said. “And you're seeing the proof point, the ROIC on that, in terms of just the growth rate we're seeing, whether it's growth rate within Search or certainly the Cloud business and the opportunity we have within the Cloud backlog.”

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

SpaceX filings reportedly show no one can fire Elon Musk except Elon Musk

The only thing stopping Elon Musk from being chairman and CEO of SpaceX is Elon Musk, according to Reuters, which viewed an excerpt of the company’s IPO filing.

The document outlines a dual-class share structure giving Musk control via super-voting stock. The filing says he “can only be removed from our board or these positions by the vote of Class B holders” — shares he’ll control after the listing. It adds that if he keeps those shares, he could “continue to control the election and removal of a majority of our board.”

At a typical public company — even founder-led ones with dual-class structures — a CEO can be fired by the board of directors, which represents shareholders and can vote to remove them over issues such as corporate performance, strategy, or misconduct.

The unusual SpaceX setup means Musk is unlikely to face the kind of CEO succession pressure he’s dealt with at Tesla. Musk, of course, is not a typical CEO, and the value of his companies has long been closely tied to his presence.

To be sure, SpaceXs confidential IPO filing isnt in its final form yet — while the filing is still in the confidential phase, the company will be going back and forth with the SEC, which will review it and suggest or require changes.

At a typical public company — even founder-led ones with dual-class structures — a CEO can be fired by the board of directors, which represents shareholders and can vote to remove them over issues such as corporate performance, strategy, or misconduct.

The unusual SpaceX setup means Musk is unlikely to face the kind of CEO succession pressure he’s dealt with at Tesla. Musk, of course, is not a typical CEO, and the value of his companies has long been closely tied to his presence.

To be sure, SpaceXs confidential IPO filing isnt in its final form yet — while the filing is still in the confidential phase, the company will be going back and forth with the SEC, which will review it and suggest or require changes.

tech
Rani Molla

OpenAI’s models are officially coming to Amazon

Amazon is finally getting in on the hottest ticket in tech.

After Microsoft announced yesterday that it has agreed to give up its exclusive rights to sell OpenAI’s models, Amazon, as expected, will start offering them to customers — something Amazon Web Services CEO Matt Garman says users have been asking for “for a really long time.” Some models are available now in preview, and the most powerful GPT versions will show up “in the coming weeks.”

This is a big shift in the AI cloud wars. Microsoft’s early bet on OpenAI gave Azure an edge by locking up the most in-demand models. Now that exclusivity is gone, Amazon and other competitors can finally offer them too, closing a key gap and competing more directly for AI customers.

This is a big shift in the AI cloud wars. Microsoft’s early bet on OpenAI gave Azure an edge by locking up the most in-demand models. Now that exclusivity is gone, Amazon and other competitors can finally offer them too, closing a key gap and competing more directly for AI customers.

tech

Ship-tracking app surges as Iran war continues

As Middle East peace talks stretch on, with Tehran reportedly offering to reopen the Strait of Hormuz if the US lifts its blockade and the war ends, the owner of shipping intelligence platform MarineTraffic revealed that the app has gained millions of new users since the conflict began.

MarineTraffic’s user count jumped to 8.5 million this April, up from 3.5 million a year ago, the cofounder of its parent company, Kpler, said in an interview with the Financial Times. Paid subscribers, often workers within companies and governments looking for more data on supply chains and commodities trading, rose 11,000 in the same period.

Kpler, which also owns shipping intelligence platform FleetMon, draws its data from a range of sources, including the Automatic Identification System, satellites, and more than 500 people on-site, like port terminal operators.

Per Appfigures data, MarineTraffic is estimated to have raked in almost $1 million across March and April in app revenue (through April 27), more than double the ~$346,500 from the same months last year. Across the full year, Kpler expects to earn between $300 million and $400 million in annual recurring revenues.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.