Tech
Chatbot speech bubbles
(Getty Images)
out of character

Teens are upset that they can’t speak to Character.AI chatbots anymore

The platform has restricted access for those under 18, as concerns around the tech’s impact grow.

Tom Jones

As far as execs at Character.AI are concerned, (role) playtime’s over for under-18s, as they start to ban teens from using the platform’s chatbots this week

The chatbot company, which clocks about 184 million website visits around the world each month — and millions more app sessions — per data from Similarweb, announced at the end of last month that it would be rolling back access to its open-ended chat feature for minors. Users who are under 18 have been limited to daily two-hour open-ended chats since the late October notice, and access started ramping down for most of those in the age range yesterday.

Indeed, a selection of young “power users,” as The Wall Street Journal termed them in a piece on the anguish some under-18 users are experiencing at being separated from the chatbots, are being given a weeks-long grace period where they can still access hour-long open-ended chats with the characters they’ve been interacting with, to “help minimize disruption” to the teen users.

Clearly, AI-generated conversations with popular characters like Yor Forger, “a loving mom who’s definitely not an assassin,” and Itoshi Rin, who “only loves soccer... and you,” have a lot of (mostly younger) users in the site’s full thrall.

Character.ai demographic chart
Sherwood News

Though traffic-tracking site Similarweb doesn’t break out under-18s in its demographics data, the figures it does disclose already show that Character.AI tends to skew a lot younger than more general competitors like ChatGPT.

According to US-specific figures from Similarweb, of the 1.7 million monthly unique web visitors character.ai notched on average from August to October, some 52% were aged between 18 and 24, compared to a 26% share on chatgpt.com.

A lot to talk about

Character.AI’s younger users tend to be way more locked in, too: per the data, they visited 26 times each month on average and spent 18 minutes in a typical session using Character.AI — much higher than ChatGPT users, who visited the OpenAI chatbot 13 times on average across the month, spending around 6 minutes per visit.

Those sorts of numbers, paired with deaths linked to the platform and increasing concerns around the detrimental effects of chatbots on younger minds more generally, were likely factors in the move to pare back teen user access, which — at least according to Character.AI CEO Karandeep Anand — “wasn’t a very hard decision.”

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Morgan Stanley expects Tesla to have 1,000 Robotaxis by the end of 2026. Musk had predicted 1,500 by the end of 2025

Ahead of Tesla’s earnings report next week, Morgan Stanley has released a note estimating that the company will scale its Robotaxi fleet much more slowly than CEO Elon Musk has said. The firm thinks the automaker will have 1,000 vehicles in its Robotaxi service by the end of 2026 — 500 fewer than Musk estimated a few months ago Tesla would have by the end of 2025.

More key to Tesla’s success, however, will be removing the safety monitors from those rides, which Morgan Stanley says will be a “precursor to personal unsupervised FSD [Full Self-Driving] rollout.” Musk, of course, had also promised to remove safety drivers in Austin by the end of 2025, but driverless rides are still in the testing stage.

tech

Meta says it’s delivered new AI models internally this month and they’re “very good”

Meta’s last AI model release, Llama 4, was marred by delays and accusations of rigged benchmarks, but the company says the latest models built by its Superintelligence Labs team look promising. CTO Andrew Bosworth told reporters at the World Economic Forum that the team delivered new models internally in January and they’re “very good.”

Bosworth didn’t specify what the models are, though The Wall Street Journal has reported that Meta is working on a large language model and an AI image and video model code-named Avocado and Mango, respectively.

tech

Two charts that show why Amazon is building a giant physical store

This week Amazon received approval to build a hybrid big-box store and fulfillment center outside Chicago that’s roughly twice the size of a typical Target. Why would the e-commerce giant want to wade into a costly and cumbersome physical store, especially after earlier brick-and-mortar iterations like Amazon Go have failed?

There are at least two reasons. First, despite e-commerce’s rapid growth, the vast majority of retail purchases still happen in physical stores, according to Census Bureau data:

Second, Amazon’s own customers regularly shop at competing big-box retailers: Consumer Intelligence Research Partners found that 93% have also shopped at Walmart. And as Amazon pushes further into groceries — a category still dominated by in-person shopping — CIRP estimates that basically all Amazon customers buy groceries elsewhere.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.