Tech
tech
Jon Keegan

Sam Altman denies OpenAI’s Microsoft deal is falling apart, teases product launches

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was interviewed today by Andrew Ross Sorkin at The New York Times’ DealBook Summit, and he said a few interesting things about his company’s relationship with partner Microsoft, Elon Musk’s new political influence, and the theoretical limits of AI scaling. Altman also teased an upcoming “12 Days of OpenAI” product launches.

Altman was asked about reports that OpenAI’s $13 billion deal with Microsoft is in danger of falling apart:

“I don’t think we’re disentangling. I will not pretend that there are no misalignments or challenges. Obviously there are some. But on the whole, I think it’s been a tremendously positive thing for both companies.”

Regarding the AI-computing arms race, Altman was asked if OpenAI needed to build out its own computing resources, rather than relying on partners (like Nvidia and Microsoft):

“No... I think we need to ensure that we get enough compute of the kind we want, that we can rely on and all of that. And there may be reasons we have some very crazy ideas about things we’d like to build that are, you know, like high risk, high reward. But we certainly don’t need to have OpenAI get really good at building computer like, massive-scale data centers.”

Sorkin asked Altman about the fact that he never received any equity in OpenAI, which is seeking to shift from a nonprofit entity to a primary for-profit business.

“Look, it is weird that I didn’t get equity... I didn’t want it... If I could go back in time, I would have taken it... just some little bit, just to never have to answer this question.”

Looking ahead to what the next year or two of AI progress will look like, Altman said:

“Agents are the thing everyone is talking about... you know, this idea that you can give an AI system a pretty complicated task, like a kind of task you give to a very smart human that takes a while to go off and do and use a bunch of tools and create something of value. That’s the kind of thing I’d expect next year... If that works as well as we hope it does, that can, that can really transform things.”

Some of the most interesting things Altman said were related to OpenAI cofounder Elon Musk and his xAI startup, which is in direct competition with ChatGPT. Referring to xAI, Altman said, “I assume they will be a really serious competitor... Tremendous respect for how quickly they built that data center,” referring to Colossus, xAI’s massive supercomputing cluster powered by 100,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs.

The conversation then turned to Elon Musk’s newfound political influence flowing from his close relationship with President-elect Donald Trump, and how Musk might use that leverage to benefit his empire and punish competitors:

“It would be profoundly un-American to use political power—to the degree that Elon has it— to hurt your competitors... I don’t think Elon would do it.”

Altman reflected on his personal relationship with Musk, which has soured: “I grew up with him as like a mega-hero... I’m still glad he exists.”

When asked if reports of AI’s scaling laws might be hitting a wall, Altman didn’t buy it:

“I’ve always been struck by how much people love to speculate on, is there a wall, is scaling going to keep on going? Rather than just like, look at the curve of progress and say, ‘Maybe I shouldn’t bet an exponential against an exponential like that.’”

Altman teased a flurry of daily OpenAI launches and demos that will be taking place over the next few weeks:

“We have a bunch of new, great stuff... We’re doing ‘12 Days of OpenAI’ starting tomorrow, but we’re gonna launch something or do a demo every day for the next, like, 12 weekdays.”

This post has been updated to clarify a quote form Sam Altman.

Altman was asked about reports that OpenAI’s $13 billion deal with Microsoft is in danger of falling apart:

“I don’t think we’re disentangling. I will not pretend that there are no misalignments or challenges. Obviously there are some. But on the whole, I think it’s been a tremendously positive thing for both companies.”

Regarding the AI-computing arms race, Altman was asked if OpenAI needed to build out its own computing resources, rather than relying on partners (like Nvidia and Microsoft):

“No... I think we need to ensure that we get enough compute of the kind we want, that we can rely on and all of that. And there may be reasons we have some very crazy ideas about things we’d like to build that are, you know, like high risk, high reward. But we certainly don’t need to have OpenAI get really good at building computer like, massive-scale data centers.”

Sorkin asked Altman about the fact that he never received any equity in OpenAI, which is seeking to shift from a nonprofit entity to a primary for-profit business.

“Look, it is weird that I didn’t get equity... I didn’t want it... If I could go back in time, I would have taken it... just some little bit, just to never have to answer this question.”

Looking ahead to what the next year or two of AI progress will look like, Altman said:

“Agents are the thing everyone is talking about... you know, this idea that you can give an AI system a pretty complicated task, like a kind of task you give to a very smart human that takes a while to go off and do and use a bunch of tools and create something of value. That’s the kind of thing I’d expect next year... If that works as well as we hope it does, that can, that can really transform things.”

Some of the most interesting things Altman said were related to OpenAI cofounder Elon Musk and his xAI startup, which is in direct competition with ChatGPT. Referring to xAI, Altman said, “I assume they will be a really serious competitor... Tremendous respect for how quickly they built that data center,” referring to Colossus, xAI’s massive supercomputing cluster powered by 100,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs.

The conversation then turned to Elon Musk’s newfound political influence flowing from his close relationship with President-elect Donald Trump, and how Musk might use that leverage to benefit his empire and punish competitors:

“It would be profoundly un-American to use political power—to the degree that Elon has it— to hurt your competitors... I don’t think Elon would do it.”

Altman reflected on his personal relationship with Musk, which has soured: “I grew up with him as like a mega-hero... I’m still glad he exists.”

When asked if reports of AI’s scaling laws might be hitting a wall, Altman didn’t buy it:

“I’ve always been struck by how much people love to speculate on, is there a wall, is scaling going to keep on going? Rather than just like, look at the curve of progress and say, ‘Maybe I shouldn’t bet an exponential against an exponential like that.’”

Altman teased a flurry of daily OpenAI launches and demos that will be taking place over the next few weeks:

“We have a bunch of new, great stuff... We’re doing ‘12 Days of OpenAI’ starting tomorrow, but we’re gonna launch something or do a demo every day for the next, like, 12 weekdays.”

This post has been updated to clarify a quote form Sam Altman.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Apple to pay Google $1 billion a year for access to AI model for Siri

Apple plans to pay Google about $1 billion a year to use the search giant’s AI model for Siri, Bloomberg reports. Google’s model — at 1.2 trillion parameters — is way bigger than Apple’s current models.

The deal aims to help the iPhone maker improve its lagging AI efforts, powering a new Siri slated to come out this spring.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

tech

Netflix creates new made-up metric for advertisers

It’s not quite WeWork’s community-adjusted EBITDA, but it’s also not quite a real number: Netflix announced today that it has 190 million “monthly active viewers” for its lower-cost ad-supported tiers. The company came up with the metric by measuring the number of subscribers who’ve watched “at least 1 minute of ads on Netflix per month” and multiplying that by what its research assumes is the number of people in that household.

It builds on Netflix’s previous attempt at measuring ad viewership with monthly active users, which is the number of profiles that have watched ads (94 million as of May). The MAV measurement, of course, is a lot bigger, and bigger numbers are more attractive to advertisers, who are spending more and more on streaming platforms.

“After speaking to our partners, we know that what they want most is an accurate, clear, and transparent representation of who their ads are reaching,” Netflix President of Advertising Amy Reinhard explained in a press release. “Our move to viewers means we can give a more comprehensive count of how many people are actually on the couch, enjoying our can’t-miss series, films, games, and live events with friends and family.”

Netflix last reported its long-followed and more easily understood paid membership numbers at the beginning of the year, when it crossed 300 million.

It builds on Netflix’s previous attempt at measuring ad viewership with monthly active users, which is the number of profiles that have watched ads (94 million as of May). The MAV measurement, of course, is a lot bigger, and bigger numbers are more attractive to advertisers, who are spending more and more on streaming platforms.

“After speaking to our partners, we know that what they want most is an accurate, clear, and transparent representation of who their ads are reaching,” Netflix President of Advertising Amy Reinhard explained in a press release. “Our move to viewers means we can give a more comprehensive count of how many people are actually on the couch, enjoying our can’t-miss series, films, games, and live events with friends and family.”

Netflix last reported its long-followed and more easily understood paid membership numbers at the beginning of the year, when it crossed 300 million.

tech

Ahead of Musk’s pay package vote, Tesla’s board says they can’t make him work there full time

Ahead of Tesla’s CEO compensation vote at its annual shareholder meeting tomorrow, The Wall Street Journal did a deep dive into how Elon Musk, who stands to gain $1 trillion if he stays at Tesla and hits a number of milestones, spends his time.

Like a similar piece from The New York Times in September, this one has a lot of fun details. Read it all, but here are some to tide you over:

  • Musk spent so much time at xAI this summer that he held meetings there with Tesla employees.

  • He personally oversaw the design of a sexy chatbot named Ani, who sports pigtails and skimpy clothes and for whom “employees were compelled to turn over their biometric data” to train.

  • The chatbot, which users can ask to “change into lingerie or fantasize about a romantic encounter with them,” has helped boost user numbers, which are still way lower than ChatGPT’s.

  • Executives and board members have told top investors in the past few weeks that they can’t make Musk work at Tesla full time. Board Chair Robyn Denholm explained that in his free time, Musk “likes to create companies, and they’re not necessarily Tesla companies.”

Like a similar piece from The New York Times in September, this one has a lot of fun details. Read it all, but here are some to tide you over:

  • Musk spent so much time at xAI this summer that he held meetings there with Tesla employees.

  • He personally oversaw the design of a sexy chatbot named Ani, who sports pigtails and skimpy clothes and for whom “employees were compelled to turn over their biometric data” to train.

  • The chatbot, which users can ask to “change into lingerie or fantasize about a romantic encounter with them,” has helped boost user numbers, which are still way lower than ChatGPT’s.

  • Executives and board members have told top investors in the past few weeks that they can’t make Musk work at Tesla full time. Board Chair Robyn Denholm explained that in his free time, Musk “likes to create companies, and they’re not necessarily Tesla companies.”

tech

Motion Picture Association to Meta: Stop saying Instagram teen content is “PG-13”

In October, Meta announced that its updated Instagram Teen Accounts would by default limit content to the “PG-13” rating.

The Motion Picture Association, which created the film rating standard, was not happy about Meta’s use of the rating, and sent the company a cease and desist letter, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

The letter from MPA’s law firm reportedly said the organization worked for decades to earn the public’s trust in the rating system, and it does not want Meta’s AI-powered content moderation failures to blow back on its work:

“Any dissatisfaction with Meta’s automated classification will inevitably cause the public to question the integrity of the MPA’s rating system.”

Meta told the WSJ that it never claimed or implied the content on Instagram Teen Accounts would be certified by the MPA.

The letter from MPA’s law firm reportedly said the organization worked for decades to earn the public’s trust in the rating system, and it does not want Meta’s AI-powered content moderation failures to blow back on its work:

“Any dissatisfaction with Meta’s automated classification will inevitably cause the public to question the integrity of the MPA’s rating system.”

Meta told the WSJ that it never claimed or implied the content on Instagram Teen Accounts would be certified by the MPA.

tech

Dan Ives expects “overwhelming shareholder approval” of Tesla CEO pay package

Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, like prediction markets, thinks Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package will receive “overwhelming shareholder approval” at the company’s annual shareholder meeting Thursday afternoon. The Tesla bull, like the Tesla board, has maintained that approval of the performance-based pay package is integral to keeping Musk at the helm of the company, which in turn is integral to the success of the company. Ives is also confident that investors will back the proposal allowing Tesla to invest in another of Musk’s companies, xAI.

“We expect shareholders to show overwhelming support tomorrow for Musk and the xAI stake further turning Tesla into an AI juggernaut with the autonomous and robotics future on the horizon,” Ives wrote in a note this morning.

The compensation package has received pushback, including from Tesla’s sixth-biggest institutional investor, Norway’s Norges Bank Investment Management, and from proxy adviser Institutional Shareholder Services.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.