Tech
Stargate I in Abilene, Texas.
Stargate I in Abilene, Texas (OpenAI)

Rising ambitions and skyrocketing costs: Here’s what we know about Project Stargate

As the number of gigawatts and GPUs grows, so do the questions about how the massive data center project will be paid for.

As tech giants like Meta, xAI, Microsoft, and Amazon race to build colossal AI data centers, one massive undertaking stands apart from the rest in its ambitious goals: Project Stargate.

In the eight months since Stargate was announced — backed by partners OpenAI, Oracle, SoftBank, and Nvidia, which have pledged hundreds of billions toward it — the scale and ambition of the project have grown.

Still, details are scant and questions have arisen about how the companies involved will raise the eye-popping amounts of capital needed for the pricey data centers described in the plan. 

A time lapse of Stargate I construction, in Abilene, Texas. Imagery from April 26, 2024, to September 29, 2025 (Copernicus)

Let’s dive into the details of what we know about Stargate’s plans in the US, and look at the questions that remain unanswered. 

“Project Ludicrous”

In January 2025, on the first full day of his second term, President Trump announced the largest “AI infrastructure project, by far, in history” standing alongside SoftBank founder and CEO Masayoshi Son, Oracle founder and CTO Larry Ellison, and OpenAI cofounder and CEO Sam Altman.

Trump described Project Stargate as a new American company that will be investing $500 billion in the US and creating over 100,000 jobs “almost immediately.” The plan was audacious and at a scale without precedent. 

Ellison, Son, and Altman spilled some details: 

  • The first site was a massive data center already under construction in Abilene, Texas.

  • The project consisted of 10 sites, and each building would be 500,000 square feet.

  • The plan would expand to 20 sites.

  • Son said SoftBank would invest $100 billion “immediately,” and the remaining $400 billion over four years.

While plans were being developed, the effort went by the code name “Project Ludicrous.”

OpenAI’s initial press release identified the equity partners in Stargate as SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX — United Arab Emirates’ state-owned investment fund. Arm, Microsoft, and Nvidia were listed as technology partners. 

Stargate I, the first site of the project, will reportedly cost about $12 billion to build. That’s not counting the 64,000 Nvidia GB200 GPUs that will fill the data center, totaling 1.2 gigawatts of computing power, the cost of which is in the tens of billions.  

After the January announcement, we didn’t hear much about the project until March, when Bloomberg reported that SoftBank was seeking a $16.5 billion bridge loan for it — the largest dollar-based loan that the company has taken on, resulting in two ratings agencies warning about it creating potential financial strains. 

In May, Bloomberg reported that SoftBank’s initial $100 billion investment had yet to materialize, even though it was supposed to happen “immediately,” and that the company had yet to formalize details of the financing. April’s trade chaos and the shocking effects of DeepSeek’s R1 model spooked investors, complicating SoftBank’s fundraising efforts. 

4.5, 7, 10 gigawatts

In July, the companies gave an update on the project and announced an expansion. Oracle and OpenAI outlined an agreement to develop an additional 4.5 gigawatts of capacity in US data centers under the Stargate umbrella, expanding upon the original 1.2 gigawatts planned for Stargate I. OpenAI said parts of the Stargate I facility were up and running and that deliveries of the first of 2 million Nvidia GPUs had arrived.  

A flurry of eye-popping AI infrastructure deals between Stargate partners followed.

In September, when Oracle announced its first-quarter earnings, shares rocketed up 30% when the company announced it had “remaining performance obligations” — signed deals that were backlogged — that were “likely to exceed half-a-trillion dollars.” The next day it was reported that part of that backlog was a huge deal with OpenAI.

OpenAI had signed an agreement with Oracle to buy $300 billion worth of cloud computing from the database giant over five years. But the deal raised serious questions about how exactly OpenAI is going to find this money, as it currently expects to burn $115 billion through 2029.

A few weeks later, Stargate partners OpenAI and Nvidia announced that they had signed a “letter of intent” for a strategic partnership. The blockbuster agreement consisted of a $100 billion investment in OpenAI by Nvidia to build and deploy “at least 10 gigawatts” of AI data centers, filled with Nvidia’s next-gen Vera Rubin chips. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told CNBC that 10 gigawatts’ worth of computing power means “roughly 4 million, 5 million GPUs,” which he said was twice the amount that the company shipped last year. Nvidia’s $100 billion investment would be spread out in $10 billion payments, as each gigawatt of capacity was deployed. 

According to a report by Reuters, the unusual agreement gave Nvidia nonvoting shares in OpenAI, and OpenAI would then use that capital to pay Nvidia for its chips, raising concerns of a “circular deal,” which industry observers fear might be a harbinger of a massive AI bubble.

While the announcement did not specifically say that the deal was part of Stargate, Nvidia is the supplier of the AI and networking hardware for the project, and given the massive scale, it is sure to overlap with Stargate.

Power-hungry

OpenAI appears to be pulling in substantial revenue, but it’s also burning cash at an alarming rate. The Information reports that the company expects to end the year with $13 billion in revenue, while burning $8.5 billion in cash. The company has some extremely optimistic projections for growth, which it hopes will lead to AGI and hopefully a viable business model along the way. (OpenAI didn’t respond to a request for comment.)

Even 10 gigawatts of computing power might not be enough for Altman, who wants much, much more than that. According to The Information, Altman has said internally that he wants 250 gigawatts by 2033 (which could cost up to $12.5 trillion). 

More Tech

See all Tech
Incredulous Man

One year after the DeepSeek freak, the AI industry has adjusted and roared back

A look back at how the Chinese startup shattered conventions, changed the way Big Tech thought about AI, and blew a $1 trillion hole in the stock market that got filled right back up... and then soared to new levels.

tech

Georgia lawmakers introduce data center construction moratorium amid statewide pushback

More and more communities across the US are wrestling with the pros and cons of having a data center come to town. Georgia has become a hotspot of resistance to the data centers planned by Big Tech, according to a new report from The Guardian. The Atlanta metro area led the nation in data center construction in 2024.

Georgia state representatives introduced legislation that would place a one-year moratorium on data center construction in the state. Ten Georgia municipalities have already passed local bans on data centers.

Per the report, at least three other states have seen similar data center moratorium legislation introduced in the last week, including Maryland and Oklahoma.

Georgia state representatives introduced legislation that would place a one-year moratorium on data center construction in the state. Ten Georgia municipalities have already passed local bans on data centers.

Per the report, at least three other states have seen similar data center moratorium legislation introduced in the last week, including Maryland and Oklahoma.

tech

Corning soars after striking deal to sell up to $6 billion in optical infrastructure to Meta

Glass company Corning is soaring in early trading after announcing a $6 billion deal with Meta to provide its data centers with fiber-optic cable products. Thanks to a string of big tech deals — including partnerships with Broadcom and Apple — Corning’s stock is up about 100% over the past year.

A 175-year-old glass manufacturer, Corning is known for its Gorilla Glass, used in smartphone and laptop screens. It was known in the past for its iconic blue cornflower CorningWare ceramics, a consumer cookware business it spun off in the 1990s.

In an interview, Corning CEO Wendell Weeks told CNBC that he thinks “next year the hyperscalers will be our biggest customers,” amid demand from tech giants including Google and Microsoft.

tech

Wedbush’s Dan Ives predicts Tesla FSD penetration will rise from 12% to above 50%, but doesn’t say how

Ahead of earnings Wednesday, a new note on Tesla from Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives argues the company is on the cusp of a Robotaxi-driven transformation, with Full Self-Driving penetration rising above 50% and autonomy unlocking as much as $1 trillion in value — putting Tesla on a path to a $2 trillion to $3 trillion market cap over the coming year.

The issue isn’t the optimism; it’s the absence of mechanics. FSD penetration across Tesla’s global fleet currently sits in the low teens. The note doesn’t explain how Tesla bridges that gap — whether through pricing changes, bundling, or a behavioral shift among mass-market buyers. Tesla is ending the option to buy FSD outright in favor of subscriptions, but that alone isn’t going to push adoption from roughly 12% to 50%.

Ives treats Teslas Robotaxi progress as inevitable rather than conditional. The removal of safety drivers in Austin — which for now is isolated to two or three vehicles and involves using an extra car to follow the Robotaxi — is framed as a tipping point. But there’s little discussion of scaling risks, regulation, real-world performance data, or actual demand. Ives only says President Trump will likely issue an executive order on autonomous rules and regulatory hurdles will effectively disappear — with the implication that FSD adoption would accelerate rapidly.

Even near-term fundamentals are stretched to support the narrative. Tesla didn’t beat Q4 delivery expectations, though Ives says it did, having previously cited whisper numbers rather than the analyst consensus. That claim is then used to clear the runway for a valuation argument focused almost entirely on future autonomy.

In the end, this is less an earnings preview note than a statement of belief: autonomy works; adoption follows; Tesla wins at scale.

That story may eventually prove right — but for now, it’s an assertion that outstrips the evidence.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.