Tech
tech
Jon Keegan
3/10/25

Quit the yapping: New AI technique could cut costs 90% by saying less

A consensus is emerging in AI circles that the way forward involves models that use “chain of reasoning” to get better performance, at the expense of costlier computing resources. This process involves instructing the model to break a problem down into detailed step-by-step instructions. The problem is that these steps can be pretty verbose, and when it comes to AI, more words = more cost.

A new paper from researchers at Zoom shows that using a new technique dubbed “chain of draft,” if you tell a model to simply limit those steps to succinct “drafts” of only five words or so, rather than wordy sentences, not only can you still achieve high performance on responses, but you can cut computing costs by up to 90%.

AI models are priced by the number of “tokens” — or portions of words — that are input and output by the model. For example: OpenAI’s o3-mini “reasoning” model costs $1.10 per million tokens input, and $4.40 per million tokens of output. That may seem cheap, but when you’re processing millions of queries, this can really add up.

“By reducing verbosity and focusing on critical insights, CoD matches or surpasses CoT in accuracy while using as little as only 7.6% of the tokens, significantly reducing cost and latency across various reasoning tasks,” the paper reports.

Translation: it’s faster, cheaper, and sometimes better than chain of thought.

This approach is also notable for its ease of use. You can simply change the prompts you enter to get this benefit. That said, most of the gains were found using larger models like OpenAI’s GPT-4o and Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet, while using smaller models resulted in poorer performance.

Go deeper: Here are OpenAI’s 50 Laws of Robotics

A new paper from researchers at Zoom shows that using a new technique dubbed “chain of draft,” if you tell a model to simply limit those steps to succinct “drafts” of only five words or so, rather than wordy sentences, not only can you still achieve high performance on responses, but you can cut computing costs by up to 90%.

AI models are priced by the number of “tokens” — or portions of words — that are input and output by the model. For example: OpenAI’s o3-mini “reasoning” model costs $1.10 per million tokens input, and $4.40 per million tokens of output. That may seem cheap, but when you’re processing millions of queries, this can really add up.

“By reducing verbosity and focusing on critical insights, CoD matches or surpasses CoT in accuracy while using as little as only 7.6% of the tokens, significantly reducing cost and latency across various reasoning tasks,” the paper reports.

Translation: it’s faster, cheaper, and sometimes better than chain of thought.

This approach is also notable for its ease of use. You can simply change the prompts you enter to get this benefit. That said, most of the gains were found using larger models like OpenAI’s GPT-4o and Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet, while using smaller models resulted in poorer performance.

Go deeper: Here are OpenAI’s 50 Laws of Robotics

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

OpenAI and Microsoft reach agreement that moves OpenAI closer to for-profit status

In a joint statement, OpenAI and Microsoft announced a “non-binding memorandum of understanding” for their renegotiated $13 billion partnership, which was a source of recent tension between the two companies.

Settling the agreement is a requirement to clear the way for OpenAI to convert to a for-profit public benefit corporation, which it must do before a year-end deadline to secure a $20 billion investment from SoftBank.

OpenAI also announced that the controlling non-profit arm would hold an equity stake in the PBC valued at $100 billion, which would “making it one of the most well-resourced philanthropic organizations in the world.”

The statement read:

“This recapitalization would also enable us to raise the capital required to accomplish our mission—and ensure that as OpenAI’s PBC grows, so will the nonprofit’s resources, allowing us to bring it to historic levels of community impact.”

Settling the agreement is a requirement to clear the way for OpenAI to convert to a for-profit public benefit corporation, which it must do before a year-end deadline to secure a $20 billion investment from SoftBank.

OpenAI also announced that the controlling non-profit arm would hold an equity stake in the PBC valued at $100 billion, which would “making it one of the most well-resourced philanthropic organizations in the world.”

The statement read:

“This recapitalization would also enable us to raise the capital required to accomplish our mission—and ensure that as OpenAI’s PBC grows, so will the nonprofit’s resources, allowing us to bring it to historic levels of community impact.”

tech

BofA doesn’t expect Tesla’s ride-share service to have an impact on Uber or Lyft this year

Analysts at Bank of America Global Research compared Tesla’s new Bay Area ride-sharing service with its rivals and found that, for now, its not much competition for Uber and Lyft. “Tesla scale in SF is still small, and we dont expect impact on Uber/Lyft financial performance in 25,” they wrote.

Tesla is operating an unknown number of cars with drivers using supervised full self-driving in the Bay Area, and roughly 30 autonomous robotaxis in Austin. The company has allowed the public to download its Robotaxi app and join a waitlist, but it hasn’t said how many people have been let in off that waitlist.

While the analysts found that Tesla ride-shares are cheaper than traditional ride-share services like Uber and Lyft, the wait times are a lot longer (nine-minute wait times on average, when cars were available at all) and the process has more friction. They also said the “nature of [a] Tesla FSD ‘driver’ is slightly more aggressive than a Waymo,” the Google-owned company that’s currently operating 800 vehicles in the Bay Area.

APPLE INTELLIGENCE

Apple AI was MIA at iPhone event

A year and a half into a bungled rollout of AI into Apple’s products, Apple Intelligence was barely mentioned at the “Awe Dropping” event.

Jon Keegan9/10/25
tech
Jon Keegan
9/10/25

Oracle’s massive sales backlog is thanks to a $300 billion deal with OpenAI, WSJ reports

OpenAI has signed a massive deal to purchase $300 billion worth of cloud computing capacity from Oracle, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

The report notes that the five-year deal would be one of the largest cloud computing contracts ever signed, requiring 4.5 gigawatts of capacity.

The news is prompting shares to pare some of their massive gains, presumably because of concerns about counterparty and concentration risk.

Yesterday, Oracle shares skyrocketed as much as 30% in after-hours trading after the company forecast that it expects its cloud infrastructure business to see revenues climb to $144 billion by 2030.

Oracle shares were up as much as 43% on Wednesday.

It’s the second example in under a week of how much OpenAI’s cash burn and fundraising efforts are playing a starring role in the AI boom: the Financial Times reported that OpenAI is also the major new Broadcom customer that has placed $10 billion in orders.

Yesterday, Oracle shares skyrocketed as much as 30% in after-hours trading after the company forecast that it expects its cloud infrastructure business to see revenues climb to $144 billion by 2030.

Oracle shares were up as much as 43% on Wednesday.

It’s the second example in under a week of how much OpenAI’s cash burn and fundraising efforts are playing a starring role in the AI boom: the Financial Times reported that OpenAI is also the major new Broadcom customer that has placed $10 billion in orders.

Large companies have started to drop AI from their businesses

Census data shows drop in large companies using AI

AI appears to be everywhere, but that doesn’t mean big companies have fully embraced the use of the technology in their day-to-day business.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.