Tech
tech

OpenAI’s record-breaking test score might have cost $30,000 per puzzle

In December, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced that its new o3 “reasoning” model had, for the first time, achieved a winning score on the ARC-AGI benchmark, a notoriously difficult test that had stumped all prior AI models.

But that power came at a steep price. The ARC Foundation (which maintains the test) estimated that the price for the “high compute” configuration of the winning test was about $3,400 per puzzle.

But OpenAI has not yet released the computing costs of its winning tests.

Last week, the ARC Foundation updated its leaderboard of test results, and o3’s winning score was no longer on the chart:

“Only systems which required less than $10,000 to run are shown. Notably missing from this chart is o3 (high compute). For more information on this see our announcement blog post.”

The ARC Foundation thinks the actual o3 costs are more in line with the superexpensive o1-pro model, which is the most expensive in the industry. Based on the sky-high pricing of the o1-pro model, that means it may have cost up to $30,000 of computation to solve each puzzle. The ARC Foundation wrote:

“o3 pricing costs have been updated to use o1-pro pricing. We will update again once official o3 pricing is publicly available. The amount of compute was roughly 172x the low-compute configuration.”

OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

But that power came at a steep price. The ARC Foundation (which maintains the test) estimated that the price for the “high compute” configuration of the winning test was about $3,400 per puzzle.

But OpenAI has not yet released the computing costs of its winning tests.

Last week, the ARC Foundation updated its leaderboard of test results, and o3’s winning score was no longer on the chart:

“Only systems which required less than $10,000 to run are shown. Notably missing from this chart is o3 (high compute). For more information on this see our announcement blog post.”

The ARC Foundation thinks the actual o3 costs are more in line with the superexpensive o1-pro model, which is the most expensive in the industry. Based on the sky-high pricing of the o1-pro model, that means it may have cost up to $30,000 of computation to solve each puzzle. The ARC Foundation wrote:

“o3 pricing costs have been updated to use o1-pro pricing. We will update again once official o3 pricing is publicly available. The amount of compute was roughly 172x the low-compute configuration.”

OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Getty Images suffers partial defeat in UK lawsuit against Stability AI

Stability AI, the creator of image generation tool Stable Diffusion, largely defended itself from a copyright violation lawsuit filed by Getty Images, which alleged the company illegally trained its AI models on Getty’s image library.

Lacking strong enough evidence, Getty dropped the part of the case alleging illegal training mid-trial, according to Reuters reporting.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

tech

Norway’s wealth fund, Tesla’s sixth-largest institutional investor, votes against Musk’s pay package

Norway’s Norges Bank Investment Management, the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, said Tuesday that it voted against Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package, ahead of the EV company’s annual shareholder meeting Thursday. The fund, which has a 1.2% stake in Tesla, is the company’s sixth-largest institutional investor, according to FactSet, and the first major investor to disclose how it voted on the matter.

Tesla is down nearly 3% premarket, amid a wider pullback in equities that’s most pronounced in AI-related stocks.

“While we appreciate the significant value created under Mr. Musk’s visionary role, we are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk- consistent with our views on executive compensation,” NBIM said in a statement.

Tesla’s board considers Musk’s mammoth, performance-based pay package necessary to retain Musk. For what it’s worth, prediction markets are quite certain investors will pass the proposition.

Tesla is down nearly 3% premarket, amid a wider pullback in equities that’s most pronounced in AI-related stocks.

“While we appreciate the significant value created under Mr. Musk’s visionary role, we are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk- consistent with our views on executive compensation,” NBIM said in a statement.

Tesla’s board considers Musk’s mammoth, performance-based pay package necessary to retain Musk. For what it’s worth, prediction markets are quite certain investors will pass the proposition.

tech

Waymo to expand robotaxi service to Detroit, Las Vegas, and San Diego

Google’s Waymo robotaxi service is expanding to three new cities — Detroit, Las Vegas, and San Diego — where it has previously tested its driverless vehicles. Waymo plans to bring its Jaguar I-Pace and Zeekr RT vehicles to those three markets this week, but they won’t be immediately available to the public.

Currently Waymo is available in five US cities: Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and San Francisco.

Tesla is currently testing in Las Vegas, while Amazon’s Zoox has limited service in the city.

Currently Waymo is available in five US cities: Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and San Francisco.

Tesla is currently testing in Las Vegas, while Amazon’s Zoox has limited service in the city.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.