Tech
Open AI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman
(Kim Jae-Hwan/Getty Images)

OpenAI’s o1-pro is the most expensive AI model in the industry

No other model by a major AI company comes even close.

OpenAI just released the pricing for its o1-pro reasoning model, which draws on an insane amount of computing power to use multistep “reasoning” through problems to get better responses to prompts. This computing power doesn’t come cheap: the new pricing is the highest for any major model in the industry today, and by a lot.

As a regular human user, you can use a lot of AI tools for free, but maybe you pay $20 per month for OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus or Google’s Gemini Advanced if you use it a lot. But that’s not where the money is.

When companies are hooking their services up to AI platforms behind the scenes via an API (application programming interface), the costs can really add up. So what is the standard unit of measure for AI costs?

API pricing for AI models is measured by how much data (words, images, video, audio) you put into a model and how much data gets spit back out to you. The output costs more than the input.

The common measure for this is 1 million “tokens.” In AI parlance, a “token” is like an atomic unit of data. When text is input into a model, the words and sentences get broken down into these tokens for processing, which could be a few letters. For OpenAI’s models, one token is roughly four characters in English. So a paragraph is about 100 tokens, give or take.

For a million tokens, think Robert Caro’s epic biography of Robert Moses, “The Power Broker” — which I’m currently halfway through — a 2.3-pound, 1,300-page beast of a book. A rough estimate of this tome comes out to about 850,000 tokens.

If you put 1 million tokens into some of the leading models today, you could probably pay for it with just a few coins. For OpenAI GPT-4o Mini, the input would cost you only $0.15, while the output would cost $0.60. Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash would cost you a single penny for the input and $0.04 for the output.

OpenAI o1-pro’s pricing for 1 million tokens of input is $150, and $600 for the output.

In a tweet announcing the pricing, OpenAI wrote, “It uses more compute than o1 to provide consistently better responses.”

It’s worth pointing out that there are huge differences in the capabilities of these models — some are very small and built for specific use cases like running on a mobile device, and others are massive for advanced tasks, so differences in prices are to be expected. But as you can see from the chart, OpenAI’s pricing stands apart from the crowd.

Pricing is a key issue for OpenAI as it struggles to find a viable business model to cover the enormous costs of running these services. The company’s recent pivot to release only “reasoning” models like o1-pro going forward means much higher computing costs, as evidenced by the cost of solving individual ARC-AGI puzzles for $3,400 apiece.

Recently, The Information reported that OpenAI was considering charging $20,000 per month for “PhD-level agents.”

CEO Sam Altman said in January that OpenAI is losing money on its ChatGPT Pro product.

The company is reportedly raising money at a valuation of $340 billion, and in 2024 it was reported to have lost about $5 billion, after bringing in only $3.7 billion in revenue.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Getty Images suffers partial defeat in UK lawsuit against Stability AI

Stability AI, the creator of image generation tool Stable Diffusion, largely defended itself from a copyright violation lawsuit filed by Getty Images, which alleged the company illegally trained its AI models on Getty’s image library.

Lacking strong enough evidence, Getty dropped the part of the case alleging illegal training mid-trial, according to Reuters reporting.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

tech

Norway’s wealth fund, Tesla’s sixth-largest institutional investor, votes against Musk’s pay package

Norway’s Norges Bank Investment Management, the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, said Tuesday that it voted against Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package, ahead of the EV company’s annual shareholder meeting Thursday. The fund, which has a 1.2% stake in Tesla, is the company’s sixth-largest institutional investor, according to FactSet, and the first major investor to disclose how it voted on the matter.

Tesla is down nearly 3% premarket, amid a wider pullback in equities that’s most pronounced in AI-related stocks.

“While we appreciate the significant value created under Mr. Musk’s visionary role, we are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk- consistent with our views on executive compensation,” NBIM said in a statement.

Tesla’s board considers Musk’s mammoth, performance-based pay package necessary to retain Musk. For what it’s worth, prediction markets are quite certain investors will pass the proposition.

Tesla is down nearly 3% premarket, amid a wider pullback in equities that’s most pronounced in AI-related stocks.

“While we appreciate the significant value created under Mr. Musk’s visionary role, we are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk- consistent with our views on executive compensation,” NBIM said in a statement.

Tesla’s board considers Musk’s mammoth, performance-based pay package necessary to retain Musk. For what it’s worth, prediction markets are quite certain investors will pass the proposition.

tech

Waymo to expand robotaxi service to Detroit, Las Vegas, and San Diego

Google’s Waymo robotaxi service is expanding to three new cities — Detroit, Las Vegas, and San Diego — where it has previously tested its driverless vehicles. Waymo plans to bring its Jaguar I-Pace and Zeekr RT vehicles to those three markets this week, but they won’t be immediately available to the public.

Currently Waymo is available in five US cities: Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and San Francisco.

Tesla is currently testing in Las Vegas, while Amazon’s Zoox has limited service in the city.

Currently Waymo is available in five US cities: Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and San Francisco.

Tesla is currently testing in Las Vegas, while Amazon’s Zoox has limited service in the city.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.