Tech
Sam Altman at Italian Tech Week 2024
Sam Altman at Italian Tech Week 2024 (Stefano Guidi/Getty Images)

OpenAI’s leadership is in upheaval, but overall turnover looks shockingly low

We cross-checked the open letter most OpenAI employees signed against their publicly available employment data to see who stayed, who left, and where they work now.

OpenAI, the startup that has become synonymous with artificial intelligence itself, has seen a string of high-profile exits recently. 

Mira Murati, previously OpenAI’s chief technology officer, announced her departure last Wednesday. A few hours later, Bob McGrew, OpenAI’s chief research officer, and Barret Zoph, a vice president who ran a research team, both announced their resignations, too. They follow the departure of co-founders Ilya Sutskever and Andrej Karpathy, researcher Jan Leike and half of the entire AI safety research team, as well as an “extended leave of absence” for co-founder and president Greg Brockman. Only three of the 11 cofounders — Sam Altman, Wojciech Zaremba and technically Brockman — are still at the company.

Even though that seems like a serious shakeup since the board fired, and then brought back, Altman, the vast majority of OpenAI employees have stayed, according to a data analysis. During the Altman ouster saga last year, employees of OpenAI en masse signed an open letter in support of Altman — which gives us a snapshot of nearly every employee at the company at that time. We took all 702 names on the latest published version of the list we could find and asked Live Data Technologies to analyze how many OpenAI employees who signed the open letter have changed employers based on publicly available employment data sources, including LinkedIn, since November. 

The number is surprisingly low: despite the high-profile exits, only 41 out of the 702 people — or about 6% — who signed the open letter to the board have left the company as of September 2024, according to the Live Data analysis. Of course, publicly available data is imperfect — employees may not have up-to-date info on their social pages or may not have announced their departure, or there might not be publicly available data on certain employees at all. Still, when the data spans hundreds of employees, you can paint a pretty decent picture. 

A lot has changed at OpenAI since the Altman saga. Many of the company’s most important workers have left. And the roughly 770-employee non-profit has expanded drastically, becoming a 1,700-employee for-profit company. But its base of workers who were there when the Altman drama played out seems to have remained. 

Here are some notable moves at OpenAI since November, according to various press reports and employee posts. Many of the researchers and executives below did not sign the open letter.

  • Andrej Karpathy, co-founder and research scientist at OpenAI, left in February.

  • William Sauders, a member of the Superalignment team, which focuses on AI safety, left in February. 

  • Cullen O’Keefe, a policy researcher, left in April.

  • Daniel Kokotajlo, a researcher on OpenAI’s governance division, left in April. He said that he quit OpenAI because “due to losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI”.

  • Kokotajlo told Fortune that nearly half of the 30 or so OpenAI staff who worked on long-term AI safety has left the company, including Jan Hendrik Kirchner, Collin Burns, Jeffrey Wu, Jonathan Uesato, Steven Bills, Yuri Burda, Todor Markov and cofounder John Schulman. (Schulman and Bills both joined rival Anthropic, and both signed the open letter in November.)

  • Jan Leike, head of alignment, resigned in May and joined Anthropic. 

  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist, left OpenAI to work on his own company Safe Superintelligence, in May. He was one of the board members who voted to fire Altman. 

  • Brockman said that he would take an extended leave of absence until the end of the year.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Meta projected 10% of 2024 revenue came from scams and banned goods, Reuters reports

Meta has been making billions of dollars per year from scam ads and sales of banned goods, according internal Meta documents seen by Reuters.

The new report quantifies the scale of fraud taking place on Meta’s platforms, and how much the company profited from them.

Per the report, Meta internal projections from late last year said that 10% of the company’s total 2024 revenue would come from scammy ads and sales of banned goods — which works out to $16 billion.

Discussions within Meta acknowledged the steep fines likely to be levied against the company for not stopping the fraudulent behavior on its platforms, and the company prioritized enforcement in regions where the penalties would be steepest, the reporting found. The cost of lost revenue from clamping down on the scams was weighed against the cost of fines from regulators.

The documents reportedly show that Meta did aim to significantly reduce the fraudulent behavior, but cuts to its moderation team left the vast majority of user-reported violations to be ignored or rejected.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters the documents were a “selective view” of internal enforcement:

“We aggressively fight fraud and scams because people on our platforms don’t want this content, legitimate advertisers don’t want it, and we don’t want it either.”

Per the report, Meta internal projections from late last year said that 10% of the company’s total 2024 revenue would come from scammy ads and sales of banned goods — which works out to $16 billion.

Discussions within Meta acknowledged the steep fines likely to be levied against the company for not stopping the fraudulent behavior on its platforms, and the company prioritized enforcement in regions where the penalties would be steepest, the reporting found. The cost of lost revenue from clamping down on the scams was weighed against the cost of fines from regulators.

The documents reportedly show that Meta did aim to significantly reduce the fraudulent behavior, but cuts to its moderation team left the vast majority of user-reported violations to be ignored or rejected.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters the documents were a “selective view” of internal enforcement:

“We aggressively fight fraud and scams because people on our platforms don’t want this content, legitimate advertisers don’t want it, and we don’t want it either.”

$350B

Google wants to invest even more money into Anthropic, with the search giant in talks for a new funding round that could value the AI startup at $350 billion, Business Insider reports. That’s about double its valuation from two months ago, but still shy of competitor OpenAI’s $500 billion valuation.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, Business Insider said the new deal “could also take the form of a strategic investment where Google provides additional cloud computing services to Anthropic, a convertible note, or a priced funding round early next year.”

In October, Google, which has a 14% stake in Anthropic, announced that it had inked a deal worth “tens of billions” for Anthropic to access Google’s AI compute to train and serve its Claude model.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.