Tech
'We're so used to relying on technology.' Hospitals, airlines, agency operations around New England hampered by software outage.
Blue screen of death on display (David Ryan/Getty Images)

When in doubt, blame Europe: Microsoft pins fault for CrowdStrike fiasco on the EU

J'accuse!

If you were unfortunate enough to spend last weekend in an airport, your travel plans were probably wrecked by a widespread “blue screen of death” mishap that shut down 8.5 million Windows-powered devices, causing US airlines to cancel more than 5,000 flights on Friday and Saturday. The cause of the computer outage was a faulty software update pushed by cybersecurity provider Crowdstrike to Microsoft devices, and Microsoft blamed the system vulnerability that caused this software issue on a 2009 agreement with the EU. From The Telegraph:

Microsoft has blamed EU rules for enabling a faulty security update to cause the world’s biggest IT outage. The software giant said a 2009 agreement with the European Commission meant it was unable to make security changes that would have blocked the CrowdStrike update that triggered widespread travel and healthcare chaos on Friday.

CrowdStrike’s Falcon system, designed to prevent cyber attacks, has privileged access to a key part of a computer known as the kernel. This meant that a faulty update last week resulted in millions of Windows computers and servers being unable to load at all, leading to flight cancellations, contactless payments not working and GP surgeries being unable to make appointments.

Microsoft, which offers its own alternative to CrowdStrike known as Windows Defender, agreed in 2009 to allow multiple security providers to install software at the kernel level amid a European competition investigation.

In contrast, Apple blocked access to the kernel on its Mac computers in 2020, which it said would improve security and reliability. A Microsoft spokesman told the Wall Street Journal that it was unable to make a similar change because of the EU agreement.

For context, the “kernel” is a computer program at the core of its operating system, and buggy software updates that interact with an operating system’s kernel can, as we saw with Crowdstrike, wreak havoc on devices using that OS. Apple runs a closed operating system, locking third-party software providers out of its kernel, which safeguards its devices from incidents like this.

I wrote last week about the EU’s obsession with obscene fines for US big tech companies, so it’s fitting that Microsoft is now blaming European regulators for its 8.5 million device failure. Ben Thompson provided excellent background to Microsoft’s explanation:

Two of the companies seizing this opportunity in the 2000s were Symantec and McAfee; both reacted with outrage in 2005 and 2006 when Microsoft, in the run-up to the release of Windows Vista, introduced PatchGuard. PatchGuard was aptly named: it guarded the kernel from being patched by 3rd-parties, with the goal of increasing security…

Symantec, meanwhile, went straight to E.U. regulators, making the case that Microsoft, already in trouble over its inclusion of Internet Explorer in the 90s, and Windows Media Player in the early 2000s, was unfairly limiting competition for security offerings. The E.U. agreed and Microsoft soon backed down.

Basically, Microsoft wanted to lock third-party security software providers out of its kernel, two of said software providers cried “anti-competitive!” EU regulators agreed, and Microsoft dropped its efforts to block kernel access. Eighteen years later, a security software provider with kernel access pushed an update that shutdown millions of computers, which wouldn’t have happened if that software provider didn’t have kernel access. The EU, for what it's worth, denied responsibility for the computer failure.

Considering that 72% of global desktop computers run on Microsoft operating systems, it will be interesting to see if the tech giant can leverage the Crowdstrike bug to reverse the EU’s open-OS stance on Windows.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Meta jumps after it releases Superintelligence Labs’ first model: Muse Spark

The first big release from Meta’s Superintelligence Labs is here — a new multimodal reasoning model called Muse Spark. Shares of Meta spiked on the news, extending gains it had made earlier in the day on optimism over the ceasefire with Iran. The stock was recently up about 9%.

Meta has been playing catch-up in the generative-AI race, watching startups OpenAI and Anthropic leap ahead with ever more capable models, after the bungled rollout of its Llama 4 models.

After an expensive hiring spree assembling an all-star team of AI researchers, investors have been eager to see the fruits of this team, and to see if the accompanying billions of capex dedicated to power it — $115 billion to $135 billion this year alone — were worth it.

Meta says the release is the first in a Muse family of models, which it says it will scale up from over time. The benchmark scores released by Meta show Spark to be capable, with solid scores among popular benchmarks, but not any huge leaps over leading models from Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, and Google.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in post on Threads:

“Looking ahead, we plan to release increasingly advanced models that push the frontier of intelligence and capabilities, including new open source models. We are building products that don't just answer your questions but act as agents that do things for you. I am optimistic that this will support a wave of creativity, entrepreneurship, growth, and health. I'm looking forward to sharing more soon.”

After an expensive hiring spree assembling an all-star team of AI researchers, investors have been eager to see the fruits of this team, and to see if the accompanying billions of capex dedicated to power it — $115 billion to $135 billion this year alone — were worth it.

Meta says the release is the first in a Muse family of models, which it says it will scale up from over time. The benchmark scores released by Meta show Spark to be capable, with solid scores among popular benchmarks, but not any huge leaps over leading models from Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, and Google.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in post on Threads:

“Looking ahead, we plan to release increasingly advanced models that push the frontier of intelligence and capabilities, including new open source models. We are building products that don't just answer your questions but act as agents that do things for you. I am optimistic that this will support a wave of creativity, entrepreneurship, growth, and health. I'm looking forward to sharing more soon.”

tech

Alibaba launches new data center powered by 10,000 of its custom chips

Alibaba announced a new data center in southern China, in a partnership with China Telecom powered by its own Zhenwu chips. The new data center will contain 10,000 of the homegrown chips, and may scale up to 100,000 over time. The data center will be used for both inference and training.

China is racing to build out its own sovereign AI capabilities, and is making significant progress.

While Chinese companies and labs have released many competitive AI models, such as Alibaba’s Qwen, Z.ai’s new GLM-5.1, and the disruptive DeepSeek R1, China is still behind the US when it comes to AI chips, and it has struggled to get hold of the latest Nvidia GPUs due to US export controls.

China is racing to build out its own sovereign AI capabilities, and is making significant progress.

While Chinese companies and labs have released many competitive AI models, such as Alibaba’s Qwen, Z.ai’s new GLM-5.1, and the disruptive DeepSeek R1, China is still behind the US when it comes to AI chips, and it has struggled to get hold of the latest Nvidia GPUs due to US export controls.

Psychic Boy Wearing Head Band

Anthropic: Our new Mythos model is so powerful, we can’t release it

The unusual announcement of the model highlights its alarming new cybersecurity capabilities.

tech

Bloomberg: Apple’s foldable iPhone is on track for September after all

Scratch that... Actually, Apple’s foldable iPhone may be on track to debut later this year after all.

Hours after a report from Nikkei Asia said Apple was encountering engineering problems with the novel design that could lead to a delayed launch, Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that sources within Apple say the premium foldable iPhone is still on track to launch in September, alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Max.

Shares of Apple had plunged more than 5% on word of a possible delay, but pared losses on Gurman’s story.

According to the report, the foldable iPhone will cost more than $2,000 and will be a key part of the company’s plan to revamp the iPhone lineup.

Shares of Apple had plunged more than 5% on word of a possible delay, but pared losses on Gurman’s story.

According to the report, the foldable iPhone will cost more than $2,000 and will be a key part of the company’s plan to revamp the iPhone lineup.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.