Tech
300M
(Sherwood Media)

Meta: OK, OK! You can set your “Following” feed as the default in Threads!

The move comes amid the rapid rise of smaller rival Bluesky.

Jon Keegan

After ignoring the pleas of many users for months, Meta’s Threads is testing the ability for users to set their “Following” feed as the default view, according to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. This reversal comes after Instagram head Adam Mosseri had said this feature wouldn’t work.

Recently, Mosseri answered a user’s question about setting “Following” as the primary feed:

“Of course we’ve thought about it. We’ve tested it and tried it a number of times. Every time we have, there’s a subgroup of people who are happy, there’s a bunch of people who forget that they’re in it, and then overall, everybody who’s in it uses Instagram less and less over time. And when we ask them questions like, ”How satisfied are you with Instagram?” they actually report being less happy with Instagram more and more over time, on average.”

It’s noteworthy that Meta seems to be quickly adding some long-requested features like custom feeds, landscape video viewing, and now this default feed setting. Since the US presidential election, a massive migration of social-media users away from X has led to a huge spike in new users on Bluesky, which rose from the ashes of Jack Dorsey’s Twitter.

Thanks to the current surge of over a million sign-ups per day, Bluesky said it now has 22 million users. Threads has over 275 million users.

Threads users have complained about the chaotic “For You” feed, which has been the default view for users, as it routinely showed days-old posts, making it less useful for following breaking news events.

Meta has also stated that “political content” from users you don’t follow would not be recommended by the Threads algorithm in your “For You” feed, unless you dig into your settings and opt in to see such content.

More Tech

See all Tech
Multicolor Sticks

OpenAI is shipping everything. Anthropic is perfecting one thing.

The two AI titans are in a race to grow revenues, but they have very different strategies for releasing products. And one approach appears to be winning out.

73%

Here’s another sign Anthropic’s enterprise tools are killing it: The AI firm now captures 73% of all spending among companies buying AI tools for the first time, Axios reports, citing data from Ramp, a fintech company that provides corporate cards and expense management software. That’s up from 50% in January, when it was tied with OpenAI.

As we’ve noted, Big Tech is pivoting from experimentation to revenue — and enterprise is where that shift is playing out.

tech

Microsoft considers suing Amazon and OpenAI over $50 billion deal

Microsoft may be about to take its biggest AI partner to court, the Financial Times reports.

Microsoft, a longtime backer of OpenAI, is weighing legal action over the latter’s $50 billion deal with Amazon tied to its new Frontier AI product, arguing it could violate a key clause in their exclusive cloud deal requiring OpenAI’s models to run through Azure. Amazon and OpenAI say they’ve found a workaround. Microsoft executives disagree.

“We know our contract,” a source told the FT. “We will sue them if they breach it. If Amazon and OpenAI want to take a bet on the creativity of their contractual lawyers, I would back us, not them.”

OpenAI, which is eyeing an IPO this year and under pressure to generate more revenue, is trying to loosen Microsoft’s grip as it scales, while Microsoft increasingly sees OpenAI as both a partner and competitor.

“We know our contract,” a source told the FT. “We will sue them if they breach it. If Amazon and OpenAI want to take a bet on the creativity of their contractual lawyers, I would back us, not them.”

OpenAI, which is eyeing an IPO this year and under pressure to generate more revenue, is trying to loosen Microsoft’s grip as it scales, while Microsoft increasingly sees OpenAI as both a partner and competitor.

tech

Morgan Stanley says robotaxis could help Tesla sell more cars

Morgan Stanley analysts think Tesla’s robotaxi push could boost more than just a new business line — it could help sell more cars and software, too.

After visiting Giga Texas, analysts said they’re more optimistic about Tesla’s progress toward an unsupervised robotaxi rollout, with improvements in tricky pickup and drop-off scenarios where Tesla doesn’t have as much data from consumer usage. For now, the vast majority of its vehicles still have human supervisors in the front seat, but the analysts say the service is helping Tesla.

“Incremental unsupervised robotaxi miles driven improve the underlying autonomy model, which accelerates the path to personal unsupervised FSD [Full Self-Driving]. This, in turn supports higher FSD attach rates, improves auto demand, and cash flow generation.”

In other words, the more robotaxis drive, the better Tesla’s self-driving gets — and that could make its Full Self-Driving software more appealing and its cars easier to sell, in addition to improving its robotaxi service. Note that Tesla’s vehicle deliveries, which accounts for the lion’s share of the company’s revenue, have dropped two years in a row.

Morgan Stanley also sees a cost advantage. It estimates Tesla’s robotaxis could cost about $0.81 per mile to run today — cheaper than traditional ride-hailing and rival autonomous services — with costs falling further as purpose-built vehicles like the Cybercab scale.

Morgan Stanley maintained its equal-weight rating and $415 price target, about 4% above where the stock is currently trading.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.