Tech
tech
Jon Keegan

Meta blocks celebrity private-jet tracking accounts

Meta changed course and suspended a number of accounts on Threads and Instagram that tracked the planes of famous figures yesterday, shifting their policy on the practice. The accounts tracked the locations the takeoffs and landings of private jets owned by Elon Musk (@elonmusksjet), Taylor Swift (@taylorswiftjets), Kim Kardashian (@kimkjet), Kylie Jenner (@kyliejennerjet), Jeff Bezos (@bezosjets), and Mark Zuckerberg (@zuckerbergjet).

Jack Sweeney, owner of the accounts, posted a letter protesting the bans, in which he wrote:

“What makes this more troubling is that l’ve received no communication from Meta—no warnings, no explanation. Reporters have reached out to Meta for clarification, but so far, there’s been silence. No matter the intent, this situation reflects poorly on Meta. Across platforms like X and Threads, I’ve had a total of 38 accounts suspended. The behavior is consistent: these platforms operate without transparency, and it feels like they make arbitrary decisions.”

Sweeney started the @ElonJet account on Twitter in 2020 and the account was banned after a public tussle with Elon Musk (prior to his purchase of the platform), who claimed journalists sharing details from the trackers were sharing his “assassination coordinates.”

In response, Sweeney launched a version of the account with a 24-hour delay to address safety concerns.

As Sweeney notes in his letter, the ADS-B data which powers the trackers are publicly available information, and can be collected in real time using cheap radio gear by hobbyists. But the unwanted attention brought by the accounts has upset the subjects of his tracking, such as Taylor Swift, who threatened legal action against Sweeney.

The ADS-B data have real utility beyond powering the interest of fans and critics of celebrities. Journalists have used such aircraft tracking to report on corporate executives using company jets for personal travel, government officials using taxpayer money for personal trips, Kobe Bryant’s 2020 helicopter crash, and the FBI’s use of surveillance aircraft over American cities.

“What makes this more troubling is that l’ve received no communication from Meta—no warnings, no explanation. Reporters have reached out to Meta for clarification, but so far, there’s been silence. No matter the intent, this situation reflects poorly on Meta. Across platforms like X and Threads, I’ve had a total of 38 accounts suspended. The behavior is consistent: these platforms operate without transparency, and it feels like they make arbitrary decisions.”

Sweeney started the @ElonJet account on Twitter in 2020 and the account was banned after a public tussle with Elon Musk (prior to his purchase of the platform), who claimed journalists sharing details from the trackers were sharing his “assassination coordinates.”

In response, Sweeney launched a version of the account with a 24-hour delay to address safety concerns.

As Sweeney notes in his letter, the ADS-B data which powers the trackers are publicly available information, and can be collected in real time using cheap radio gear by hobbyists. But the unwanted attention brought by the accounts has upset the subjects of his tracking, such as Taylor Swift, who threatened legal action against Sweeney.

The ADS-B data have real utility beyond powering the interest of fans and critics of celebrities. Journalists have used such aircraft tracking to report on corporate executives using company jets for personal travel, government officials using taxpayer money for personal trips, Kobe Bryant’s 2020 helicopter crash, and the FBI’s use of surveillance aircraft over American cities.

More Tech

See all Tech
$350B

Google wants to invest even more money into Anthropic, with the search giant in talks for a new funding round that could value the AI startup at $350 billion, Business Insider reports. That’s about double its valuation from two months ago, but still shy of competitor OpenAI’s $500 billion valuation.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, Business Insider said the new deal “could also take the form of a strategic investment where Google provides additional cloud computing services to Anthropic, a convertible note, or a priced funding round early next year.”

In October, Google, which has a 14% stake in Anthropic, announced that it had inked a deal worth “tens of billions” for Anthropic to access Google’s AI compute to train and serve its Claude model.

tech

Apple to pay Google $1 billion a year for access to AI model for Siri

Apple plans to pay Google about $1 billion a year to use the search giant’s AI model for Siri, Bloomberg reports. Google’s model — at 1.2 trillion parameters — is way bigger than Apple’s current models.

The deal aims to help the iPhone maker improve its lagging AI efforts, powering a new Siri slated to come out this spring.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

tech

Netflix creates new made-up metric for advertisers

It’s not quite WeWork’s community-adjusted EBITDA, but it’s also not quite a real number: Netflix announced today that it has 190 million “monthly active viewers” for its lower-cost ad-supported tiers. The company came up with the metric by measuring the number of subscribers who’ve watched “at least 1 minute of ads on Netflix per month” and multiplying that by what its research assumes is the number of people in that household.

It builds on Netflix’s previous attempt at measuring ad viewership with monthly active users, which is the number of profiles that have watched ads (94 million as of May). The MAV measurement, of course, is a lot bigger, and bigger numbers are more attractive to advertisers, who are spending more and more on streaming platforms.

“After speaking to our partners, we know that what they want most is an accurate, clear, and transparent representation of who their ads are reaching,” Netflix President of Advertising Amy Reinhard explained in a press release. “Our move to viewers means we can give a more comprehensive count of how many people are actually on the couch, enjoying our can’t-miss series, films, games, and live events with friends and family.”

Netflix last reported its long-followed and more easily understood paid membership numbers at the beginning of the year, when it crossed 300 million.

It builds on Netflix’s previous attempt at measuring ad viewership with monthly active users, which is the number of profiles that have watched ads (94 million as of May). The MAV measurement, of course, is a lot bigger, and bigger numbers are more attractive to advertisers, who are spending more and more on streaming platforms.

“After speaking to our partners, we know that what they want most is an accurate, clear, and transparent representation of who their ads are reaching,” Netflix President of Advertising Amy Reinhard explained in a press release. “Our move to viewers means we can give a more comprehensive count of how many people are actually on the couch, enjoying our can’t-miss series, films, games, and live events with friends and family.”

Netflix last reported its long-followed and more easily understood paid membership numbers at the beginning of the year, when it crossed 300 million.

tech

Ahead of Musk’s pay package vote, Tesla’s board says they can’t make him work there full time

Ahead of Tesla’s CEO compensation vote at its annual shareholder meeting tomorrow, The Wall Street Journal did a deep dive into how Elon Musk, who stands to gain $1 trillion if he stays at Tesla and hits a number of milestones, spends his time.

Like a similar piece from The New York Times in September, this one has a lot of fun details. Read it all, but here are some to tide you over:

  • Musk spent so much time at xAI this summer that he held meetings there with Tesla employees.

  • He personally oversaw the design of a sexy chatbot named Ani, who sports pigtails and skimpy clothes and for whom “employees were compelled to turn over their biometric data” to train.

  • The chatbot, which users can ask to “change into lingerie or fantasize about a romantic encounter with them,” has helped boost user numbers, which are still way lower than ChatGPT’s.

  • Executives and board members have told top investors in the past few weeks that they can’t make Musk work at Tesla full time. Board Chair Robyn Denholm explained that in his free time, Musk “likes to create companies, and they’re not necessarily Tesla companies.”

Like a similar piece from The New York Times in September, this one has a lot of fun details. Read it all, but here are some to tide you over:

  • Musk spent so much time at xAI this summer that he held meetings there with Tesla employees.

  • He personally oversaw the design of a sexy chatbot named Ani, who sports pigtails and skimpy clothes and for whom “employees were compelled to turn over their biometric data” to train.

  • The chatbot, which users can ask to “change into lingerie or fantasize about a romantic encounter with them,” has helped boost user numbers, which are still way lower than ChatGPT’s.

  • Executives and board members have told top investors in the past few weeks that they can’t make Musk work at Tesla full time. Board Chair Robyn Denholm explained that in his free time, Musk “likes to create companies, and they’re not necessarily Tesla companies.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.