Tech

FINAL BOSS

SUBSCRIPTION TRUCKING

Einride autonomous truck
Einride’s autonomous truck (Einride)

Einride and its autonomous electric trucks are speeding toward the public markets

Where they’re going and what happens if they get pulled over on the way.

Roozbeh Charli is the CEO of Einride, a Swedish freight technology company that builds electric and autonomous trucking systems. The company, which is slated to go public via a SPAC by the end of June under the ticker ENRD, currently operates in seven countries, and has permission to operate autonomously in five states, including Arizona, Colorado, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas.

We talked with Charli about where autonomous trucking is, where it’s headed, and what happens if one of its vehicles gets pulled over.

This conversation has been edited for clarity and concision.

Rani Molla, Sherwood News: What’s the current scale of Einride’s operations?

Roozbeh Charli, CEO of Einride: We have about 200 electric trucks deployed today. We also have four autonomous vehicles in live operations with customers, and that’s going to grow to around the 20 mark by the end of the year.

Sherwood: You have three adjacent parts of the business: the autonomous trucks, the electric trucks, and the platform. How do those work together?

Charli: The way to think about it is as a single offering we call “Freight Capacity as a Service.” The core is our AI-powered software platform that sits in the middle and orchestrates the entire ecosystem required to transition our customers’ fleets from diesel and manual trucks to electric and autonomous.

The platform is the brain. That’s where we ingest customer data, do the planning, the optimization, and the actual execution plans. We can then do those operations with either our electric manual trucks or with the autonomous vehicles.

Sherwood: So that means you’re selling a subscription rather than trucks.

Charli: The absolute majority of our customers do not own the trucks or operate the transportation themselves. They go to the transport service market and purchase transportation. We take over and run those transport operations for them, and they pay for an installed transport capacity. They don’t buy the trucks or provide the drivers. We commit to a certain capacity, they commit to a minimum volume — the average contract today is about 4.5 years — and we take care of everything that has to do with running those transport operations for them.

Sherwood: What are the four autonomous vehicles in operation right now actually doing?

Charli: Take GE Appliances in Tennessee. We have two autonomous vehicles doing transportation from the production to a distribution center. It’s about two miles of road, a combination of private and public roads. We’re doing day-to-day operations moving goods: highly repetitive, high asset utilization, and a really boring type of flows to operate as a truck driver. We start with those use cases and gradually scale into more complex environments, longer distances, and higher speeds.

Roozbeh Charli
Einride CEO Roozbeh Charli (Einride)

Sherwood: Since you are on public roads, what happens if an autonomous truck gets pulled over? How does that work without a driver or a cab?

Charli: It’s an interesting topic! The vehicle drives autonomously at all points in time, but we have a remote supervisor who sits at a distance and supervises. We started with a 1-to-1 ratio, but we’re now doing a 1-to-2 ratio for the GE operations. Our next milestone is to scale that to 1-to-10.

If a situation arises, the remote operator can put the vehicle in a safe state and interact with law enforcement. We’re doing testing with voice, being able to speak to the officer through the vehicle, and visual aids for interaction. In the controlled environments where we operate today, an operator can also physically come to the vehicle since it’s a short distance.

Sherwood: Who has that remote supervisor job? Former truck drivers? AI specialists?

Charli: Former truck drivers.

Sherwood: How does the permitting process work for these routes? Is it a one-and-done approval, or is the state-by-state landscape as challenging as it’s often described?

Charli: The way the regulation works is that you work mostly with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, but also with the state legislators, and you get permits for specific applications. So rather than having a blanket “you can drive the vehicles anywhere,” you get certain applications. We say, “This is what we’re going to do,” and then we show the safety case and demonstrate the safety case for the regulator, and that’s how we get the approvals to actually operate the customer flows.

Sherwood: If I’m a big company, why do I pick Einride? What does it cost me to have my regular diesel truck and a driver versus an electric or autonomous truck?

Charli: Ultimately, the transition is going to be about unit economics and cost. We start by analyzing a customer’s data and setting a joint five-year plan. We can electrify a certain percentage of their transportation, and important to that equation is that you reach cost parity — or a cost saving of a few percentage points — using electrification even before introducing autonomous tech.

We did a research paper showing a 13% reduction in the total cost of operations (TCO) of operating an electric versus a manual diesel truck. That is a huge number in the transportation industry. Then, of course, the big step change in the TCO comes as you transition to autonomous and take the driver out of the vehicle.

Sherwood: Your recent deal with Amazon involves 75 electric vehicles. Since those aren’t autonomous, who is actually driving them? And will they eventually transition to autonomous?

Charli: For those operations, it’s a combination of external carrier partners and our own hired drivers doing the actual driving of the vehicles. For Amazon, we are focusing right now on just the EVs.

Sherwood: Who are your biggest competitors, and how is your strategy different?

Charli: You’ve got players like Kodiak, Aurora, and PlusAI. We’re all aiming to automate freight, but we’re coming at it from a shipper (transport buyer) perspective. We’re selling the transport service directly to the PepsiCos and the Heinekens of the world. Others are coming at it from a carrier perspective, building vehicles to sell to carriers, or selling technology to the truck producers. We use our platform to accumulate transport demand and gradually scale autonomous tech into those networks.

Swedish Resilience Initiative tracked vehicle using Einride Driver
An all-terrain tracked vehicle controlled by Einride Driver for the Swedish Resilience Initiative (Einride)

Sherwood: Talk to me about your latest move into defense vehicle tech.

Charli: It’s an untapped opportunity where we’ve just started scratching the surface. About 12 months ago, we launched a vehicle-agnostic autonomous driver stack. We’ve developed autonomous software that can operate vehicles, and we can now take that “Einride Driver” and apply it to different forms of vehicles.

We recently did a pilot for the Swedish Resilience Initiative where we applied our stack to a “bandwagon” — a tracked vehicle that rolls on treads like a tank. In peace times, it can be used for supply and maintenance in rural parts of the country. We also recently recruited General Keith Alexander to our board of directors to help us in our continued expansion in the defense space. You’ll see more from us coming from within defense, including US and European partnerships.

Sherwood: Where will Einride’s autonomous trucking be in five years?

Charli: We’ve got about $800 million of potential annual recurring revenue in scaling plans that contain both EVs and AVs. For autonomous, we’ll hit about 20 trucks by the end of the year, going into the hundreds a few years down the line, and then toward the thousands as we get five years out.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Alphabet sold $3.6 billion in Japanese yen bonds — a record for a foreign company — likely to help its AI capex binge

We now have the value for Alphabet’s Japanese yen bond raise — 576.5 billion yen, or $3.6 billion — and it’s a record for a foreign issuer in Japan. The deal was spread across seven tranches with maturities ranging from 3 to 40 years, allowing the company to lock in rates as low as 1.965%.

The latest deal comes on the heels of Alphabet’s massive US and European bond deals, where the company has tapped global markets for nearly $60 billion in fresh capital over the last few months. In a filing earlier this week, the search giant said it would use the proceeds for “general corporate purposes.” That likely means fueling its AI infrastructure build-out, which has pushed its projected 2026 capex bill to a staggering $190 billion.

tech

Bloomberg: Relationship between OpenAI and Apple has deteriorated and legal action may be imminent

The two-year-old alliance between Apple and OpenAI has deteriorated, Bloomberg reports, with the AI giant now consulting legal counsel about issuing a potential breach of contract notice.

OpenAI executives allege that Apple failed to adequately integrate and promote ChatGPT on the iPhone, causing the AI firm to lose out on billions a year in subscriptions and hurt its brand, according to the report.

Meanwhile, Apple has expressed concerns over OpenAI’s privacy protection, and has been miffed that OpenAI has been working on its own hardware with former Apple design lead Jony Ive.

More recently, Apple, which has trailed its peers in developing AI, has decided to offer users their choice of AI models, rather than aligning exclusively with OpenAI’s.

Meanwhile, Apple has expressed concerns over OpenAI’s privacy protection, and has been miffed that OpenAI has been working on its own hardware with former Apple design lead Jony Ive.

More recently, Apple, which has trailed its peers in developing AI, has decided to offer users their choice of AI models, rather than aligning exclusively with OpenAI’s.

tech

Report: Mythos is used to crack MacOS

Apple’s MacOS has long been considered to have some of the strongest cybersecurity protections in the industry.

But researchers using a preview release of Anthropic’s Mythos AI model were able to take control of a Mac, in a significant example of the unreleased AI model’s cyber capabilities, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

It took two security researchers five days to pull off the feat, which chained together bugs to corrupt the Mac’s memory, per the report. The researchers told the Journal that human expertise was required to use Mythos, and it would not be able to execute the attack on its own. The researchers reportedly said some of the Mythos hype was “overblown.”

Apple said it was taking the bug report “very seriously” and has not yet issued a fix.

It took two security researchers five days to pull off the feat, which chained together bugs to corrupt the Mac’s memory, per the report. The researchers told the Journal that human expertise was required to use Mythos, and it would not be able to execute the attack on its own. The researchers reportedly said some of the Mythos hype was “overblown.”

Apple said it was taking the bug report “very seriously” and has not yet issued a fix.

tech

Survey: 70% of Americans don’t want data centers in their community

America loves a good boogeyman, and data centers have become one.

It was once easy for the hyperscalers to sidle up to state legislators, utility executives, and local officials with the promise of jobs and the high-tech glow of AI for their economically challenged areas without much local opposition.

But now the script has been flipped, and public opposition to data centers is starting to solidify. A new Gallup survey asked 1,000 Americans for their thoughts on data centers, the first such survey for the polling company. Among the findings:

  • 70% of survey respondents opposed local construction of AI data centers.

  • Opposition to local data centers was much stronger than opposition to local nuclear power plants.

  • Dislike for data centers is bipartisan — majorities of both Democrats and Republicans were opposed to data centers, but more so for Democrats.

  • Among those opposed to data centers, the impact on the environment and energy usage were top concerns.

Local communities and state governments around the US have introduced bans or moratoriums on data center construction. Senators have also introduced similar legislation in Congress.

Last month, Maine Governor Janet Mills vetoed legislation that would have enacted the first statewide bill to pause data center construction.

But now the script has been flipped, and public opposition to data centers is starting to solidify. A new Gallup survey asked 1,000 Americans for their thoughts on data centers, the first such survey for the polling company. Among the findings:

  • 70% of survey respondents opposed local construction of AI data centers.

  • Opposition to local data centers was much stronger than opposition to local nuclear power plants.

  • Dislike for data centers is bipartisan — majorities of both Democrats and Republicans were opposed to data centers, but more so for Democrats.

  • Among those opposed to data centers, the impact on the environment and energy usage were top concerns.

Local communities and state governments around the US have introduced bans or moratoriums on data center construction. Senators have also introduced similar legislation in Congress.

Last month, Maine Governor Janet Mills vetoed legislation that would have enacted the first statewide bill to pause data center construction.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.