Tech
Trump Cybertruck
A Tesla Cybertruck with the word “Trump” sits in traffic in Washington, DC (Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
Blue likes green

Economists confirm what everyone already knew: Democrats buy electric vehicles

Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s political move to the right is likely alienating his core customer base.

Rani Molla

Political ideology plays a major role in Americans’ decisions to buy electric vehicles, a new NBER working paper that sifted through county-level vehicle registration data found. That’s the case even after controlling for other contributing factors like a state’s zero-emission vehicle benefits, household income, availability of charging stations, population density, and electricity prices.

The trend has remained remarkably consistent and enduring even as Democratic approval of EV poster child Tesla has slipped drastically, along with its sales.

“ I’m a little bit surprised that this pattern shows up in the data and so clearly and persistently even after we throw all demographic controls that we can think of at it,” Jing Li, assistant professor of economics at Tufts University and one of the report’s authors, told Sherwood News. Li added that the correlation didn’t change much between 2012 and 2023, the years covered in the data, as more people adopted EVs.

About half of all electric vehicle registrations in the US occurred in the top 10% most Democratic counties in the US in the past decade, the research found. In other words, Democrats buy electric vehicles, and Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s move to the right probably hasn’t been doing his company any favors.

It’s perhaps an obvious finding, but an important one for Tesla, which makes the vast majority of its revenue from EV sales in the US. Overall, EV sales continue to grow in the US, despite declines in Tesla sales.

This research adds to the bevy of survey data on the topic from the likes of Gallup and the EV Politics Project.

Li added that car companies themselves are very aware of where their cars are sold and what buyers’ demographics look like. “Every automaker would know where their sales numbers are and could do something like what we are doing much more quickly than we could,” she said.

Of course, Musk has long been trying to pivot his company’s value proposition away from that of a mere car company. Most recently Musk said, “The value of the company is delivering sustainable abundance with our affordable AI-powered robots.”

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Meta projected 10% of 2024 revenue came from scams and banned goods, Reuters reports

Meta has been making billions of dollars per year from scam ads and sales of banned goods, according internal Meta documents seen by Reuters.

The new report quantifies the scale of fraud taking place on Meta’s platforms, and how much the company profited from them.

Per the report, Meta internal projections from late last year said that 10% of the company’s total 2024 revenue would come from scammy ads and sales of banned goods — which works out to $16 billion.

Discussions within Meta acknowledged the steep fines likely to be levied against the company for not stopping the fraudulent behavior on its platforms, and the company prioritized enforcement in regions where the penalties would be steepest, the reporting found. The cost of lost revenue from clamping down on the scams was weighed against the cost of fines from regulators.

The documents reportedly show that Meta did aim to significantly reduce the fraudulent behavior, but cuts to its moderation team left the vast majority of user-reported violations to be ignored or rejected.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters the documents were a “selective view” of internal enforcement:

“We aggressively fight fraud and scams because people on our platforms don’t want this content, legitimate advertisers don’t want it, and we don’t want it either.”

Per the report, Meta internal projections from late last year said that 10% of the company’s total 2024 revenue would come from scammy ads and sales of banned goods — which works out to $16 billion.

Discussions within Meta acknowledged the steep fines likely to be levied against the company for not stopping the fraudulent behavior on its platforms, and the company prioritized enforcement in regions where the penalties would be steepest, the reporting found. The cost of lost revenue from clamping down on the scams was weighed against the cost of fines from regulators.

The documents reportedly show that Meta did aim to significantly reduce the fraudulent behavior, but cuts to its moderation team left the vast majority of user-reported violations to be ignored or rejected.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters the documents were a “selective view” of internal enforcement:

“We aggressively fight fraud and scams because people on our platforms don’t want this content, legitimate advertisers don’t want it, and we don’t want it either.”

$350B

Google wants to invest even more money into Anthropic, with the search giant in talks for a new funding round that could value the AI startup at $350 billion, Business Insider reports. That’s about double its valuation from two months ago, but still shy of competitor OpenAI’s $500 billion valuation.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, Business Insider said the new deal “could also take the form of a strategic investment where Google provides additional cloud computing services to Anthropic, a convertible note, or a priced funding round early next year.”

In October, Google, which has a 14% stake in Anthropic, announced that it had inked a deal worth “tens of billions” for Anthropic to access Google’s AI compute to train and serve its Claude model.

tech

Apple to pay Google $1 billion a year for access to AI model for Siri

Apple plans to pay Google about $1 billion a year to use the search giant’s AI model for Siri, Bloomberg reports. Google’s model — at 1.2 trillion parameters — is way bigger than Apple’s current models.

The deal aims to help the iPhone maker improve its lagging AI efforts, powering a new Siri slated to come out this spring.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

Apple had previously been considering using OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, but decided in the end to go with Google as it works toward improving its own internal models. Google, which makes a much less widely sold phone, the Pixel, has succeeded in bringing consumer AI to smartphone users where Apple has failed.

Google’s antitrust ruling in September helped safeguard the two companies’ partnerships — including the more than $20 billion Google pays Apple each year to be the default search engine on its devices — as long as they aren’t exclusive.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.