Tech
World in hand
(Getty Images)
BIGGER NUMBER BETTER

Apple’s Services division and Meta’s Reality Labs are reminders of how dominant Big Tech really is

Both are mind-boggling, for different reasons.

This week, a number of Big Tech stocks reminded us just how dominant they really are. Yes, we used to balk at the thought of having a trillion-dollar company — now we have nine — but market valuations are only one way of contextualizing the sheer size of the BATMMAAN stocks.

Two divisions, both central to the future of their respective companies, Apple’s Services business and Meta’s Reality Labs division, offer another perspective.

Beyond the core

In its Q4 earnings, Apple revealed that, just as many reports had suggested, the latest AI-powered iPhone wasn’t proving as much of a pull for consumers as CEO Tim Cook would probably like, with sales down nearly 1% in its all-important holiday quarter. What is working at Apple, however, is its Services business, which clocked more than $26 billion in sales as the company topped 1 billion total subscriptions for things like Apple Music, TV+, iCloud, and more.

Apple Services
Sherwood News

To put that figure in context, if Apple’s Services division were a stand-alone business, let’s call it iServe, it would be the 37th-largest company in the S&P 500 Index by revenue. It would be more than double the size of Netflix or Uber. It would be more lucrative than consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble, larger than Disney, and would even outmatch Tesla in terms of pure revenue.

Perhaps most remarkable: it would be bigger than Coca-Cola and Nike combined.
Apple Services
Sherwood News

Now, moving on to Meta...

Reality check

Back in 2014, Facebook made its two largest acquisitions ever in just around a month’s time. The first was messaging giant WhatsApp, and the other was a small VR headset startup called Oculus. For the latter's potential to “create the most social platform ever,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg shelled out $2 billion.

That seemed like a lot of money at the time.

But since Facebook became Meta, Reality Labs, the augmented and virtual reality arm which expanded from Oculus, has lost the company a total of ~$60 billion since 2020.

To put that number in context, we’ll use Boeing, a company that’s been plagued by safety issues, union battles, scandals, and management change, and has reported six straight years of net losses. The sum total of those losses? A mere $35.7 billion — still 40% less cash than Reality Labs has burned through.

Reality Labs Losses
Sherwood News

Of course, Meta can afford to blow $60 billion on Reality Labs, as its “Family of Apps” division reported more than $260 billion in profit over the same period.

An obvious follow-up question: is Zuck’s “long-term investment” worth the burn? Well, on the plus side, Meta does continue to lead the VR/AR market with a 70% share, with the social media giant selling 3 million units of its latest Quest 3 through the first three quarters of the device’s launch, way ahead of Apple’s Vision Pro. 

Indeed, Meta’s leadership seems as keen as ever to pour cash into the business this year, with the company reportedly integrating Reality Labs more closely with its core functions and vowing 2025 will be “a pivotal year for the metaverse.” Meta is expected to spend $65 billion on capex in this year alone, thanks to the company’s cash-intensive AI ambitions.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Palantir announces slew of defense- and security-themed partnerships

Defense, intelligence, and AI software company Palantir Technologies announced a series of security-themed partnerships Thursday, ahead of its annual conference promoting its artificial intelligence software platform (AIP).

Shares were recently up 1.7%, stretching the stock’s gains over the past month to 19%.

The deals include partnerships with uranium enrichment company Centrus Energy, jet engine maker GE Aerospace, unmanned aerial vehicle maker Ondas, and privately held World View, which sells intelligence and surveillance balloons that operate in the upper atmosphere.

Separately, it also announced a new “sovereign AI OS reference architecture,” a collaboration Palantir says “delivers customers a turnkey AI data center from hardware procurement to application deployment.”

Reference architectures are effectively blueprints that tell organizations how to set up and use AI hardware and software systems.

Known as the Palantir OS Reference Architecture, it’s based on similar AI blueprints Nvidia already sells, and it will enable customers to use Palantir’s entire product set, including the AIP and Foundry, its data organization and management product.

The deals include partnerships with uranium enrichment company Centrus Energy, jet engine maker GE Aerospace, unmanned aerial vehicle maker Ondas, and privately held World View, which sells intelligence and surveillance balloons that operate in the upper atmosphere.

Separately, it also announced a new “sovereign AI OS reference architecture,” a collaboration Palantir says “delivers customers a turnkey AI data center from hardware procurement to application deployment.”

Reference architectures are effectively blueprints that tell organizations how to set up and use AI hardware and software systems.

Known as the Palantir OS Reference Architecture, it’s based on similar AI blueprints Nvidia already sells, and it will enable customers to use Palantir’s entire product set, including the AIP and Foundry, its data organization and management product.

tech

Tesla’s China sales jump as EV market slumps

Tesla’s China sales grew 43% to 38,206 vehicles in February, compared a low baseline a year earlier.

Still, thanks to strong sales of its Model Y, Tesla defied countrywide trends — overall China EV sales fell 35% last month.

As a result, Tesla’s market share in China, its second-biggest market, grew to nearly 14% — its highest level in nearly two years.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.