Power
power

TIME names the “Architects of AI” as its Person of the Year for 2025

TIME just announced its Person of the Year… and it’s not a single person.  

The magazine selected the “Architects of AI” as its 2025 honoree, spotlighting the executives and engineers behind the year’s AI boom. One of the two covers features eight tech leaders perched on a steel beam — recreating the iconic “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper” photo from 1932 — including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, AMD’s Lisa Su, xAI’s Elon Musk, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at the center, whose chips power many of today’s AI models.

The magazine frames 2025 as the year when AI’s “full potential roared into view,” with data center constructions surging and companies crossing new valuation thresholds — while also noting growing fears of a bubble, debt-funded build-outs, and lawsuits over chatbot harms.

Prediction markets had been leaning nonhuman, with Polymarket (47%) and Kalshi (55%) both assigning the highest odds not to any one person but to “AI,” ahead of Huang, Altman, or even Pope Leo XIV, per Business Insider. Many of those bettors weren’t far off in the end — though that may be of little consolation given that the market for “Artificial Intelligence” on Polymarket resolved to “No.”

TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR
Sherwood News

Indeed, the 102-year-old magazine has chosen a group of people or even a nonhuman concept before, as TIME has long defined the award as recognizing “the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill,” according to former Managing Editor Walter Isaacson.

Across its selections since 1927, 20 awards have gone to groups or conceptual forces, including “The Apollo 8 astronauts” in 1968; “The Computer” in 1982, when TIME first broke tradition to honor the rapid rise of personal computing; “The Whistleblowers,” who exposed corporate fraud at Enron and WorldCom, in 2002; and “The Spirit of Ukraine” in 2022. 

Previously titled the “Man of the Year” award until 1999, the accolade has recognized a handful of women so far — including Queen Elizabeth II in 1952, Angela Merkel in 2015, and Taylor Swift, the most recent female recipient at age 33, in 2023.

The magazine frames 2025 as the year when AI’s “full potential roared into view,” with data center constructions surging and companies crossing new valuation thresholds — while also noting growing fears of a bubble, debt-funded build-outs, and lawsuits over chatbot harms.

Prediction markets had been leaning nonhuman, with Polymarket (47%) and Kalshi (55%) both assigning the highest odds not to any one person but to “AI,” ahead of Huang, Altman, or even Pope Leo XIV, per Business Insider. Many of those bettors weren’t far off in the end — though that may be of little consolation given that the market for “Artificial Intelligence” on Polymarket resolved to “No.”

TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR
Sherwood News

Indeed, the 102-year-old magazine has chosen a group of people or even a nonhuman concept before, as TIME has long defined the award as recognizing “the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill,” according to former Managing Editor Walter Isaacson.

Across its selections since 1927, 20 awards have gone to groups or conceptual forces, including “The Apollo 8 astronauts” in 1968; “The Computer” in 1982, when TIME first broke tradition to honor the rapid rise of personal computing; “The Whistleblowers,” who exposed corporate fraud at Enron and WorldCom, in 2002; and “The Spirit of Ukraine” in 2022. 

Previously titled the “Man of the Year” award until 1999, the accolade has recognized a handful of women so far — including Queen Elizabeth II in 1952, Angela Merkel in 2015, and Taylor Swift, the most recent female recipient at age 33, in 2023.

More Power

See all Power
Western Auctioneer with Two Fingers up and Gavel in Hand

As investors pick sides in Netflix vs. Paramount, analysts say a renewed Warner Bros. bidding war looks inevitable

Analysts at Bloomberg on Wednesday said Paramount’s WBD hostile takeover offer could go as high as $35 per share.

Netflix WBD CEOs

The Netflix-Warner Bros. deal now faces a wall of opposition

Netflix will owe Warner Bros. $5.8 billion in cash if the deal is terminated on antitrust grounds.

power
Jon Keegan

The New York Times, Chicago Tribune sue Perplexity

The New York Times is suing the AI search engine startup Perplexity, alleging repeated copyright violations.

In the complaint, the Times accuses Perplexity of scraping the company’s content and generating outputs that are “identical or substantially similar” to Times content:

“Upon information and belief, Perplexity has unlawfully copied, distributed, and displayed millions of copyrighted Times stories, videos, podcasts, images and other works to power its products and tools.”

The Times also alleges that Perplexity’s AI tool generates “hallucinations” and falsely attribute them to the Times, creating confusion that harms the company’s brand.

In a separate suit filed Thursday, the Chicago Tribune accused Perplexity of similar copyright violations.

Perplexity’s “answer engine” made early inroads in an attempt to replace traditional web searches with AI-powered responses, but its larger competitors such as OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have been adding similar features. OpenAI recently released its own AI-powered web browser, ChatGPT Atlas, which challenges Perplexity’s Comet browser.

Jesse Dwyer, Head of Communication for Perplexity told Sherwood News in a statement:

“Publishers have been suing new tech companies for a hundred years, starting with radio, TV, the internet, social media and now AI. Fortunately it’s never worked, or we’d all be talking about this by telegraph.”

“Upon information and belief, Perplexity has unlawfully copied, distributed, and displayed millions of copyrighted Times stories, videos, podcasts, images and other works to power its products and tools.”

The Times also alleges that Perplexity’s AI tool generates “hallucinations” and falsely attribute them to the Times, creating confusion that harms the company’s brand.

In a separate suit filed Thursday, the Chicago Tribune accused Perplexity of similar copyright violations.

Perplexity’s “answer engine” made early inroads in an attempt to replace traditional web searches with AI-powered responses, but its larger competitors such as OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have been adding similar features. OpenAI recently released its own AI-powered web browser, ChatGPT Atlas, which challenges Perplexity’s Comet browser.

Jesse Dwyer, Head of Communication for Perplexity told Sherwood News in a statement:

“Publishers have been suing new tech companies for a hundred years, starting with radio, TV, the internet, social media and now AI. Fortunately it’s never worked, or we’d all be talking about this by telegraph.”

power
Jon Keegan

European regulators will examine if Apple’s maps and ads businesses require stricter oversight

Apple has notified European regulators that its Apple Maps and Apple Ads platforms meet the threshold to be called “gatekeepers” under the European Commission’s Digital Markets Act, the European Commission said.

European antitrust regulators will now examine if the tech giant’s Maps and Ads units should be subject to stricter regulation. According to the DMA, when a platform reaches 45 million monthly active users and a market cap of €75 billion ($79 billion), it triggers the “gatekeeper” designation and additional rules apply.

While Apple notified regulators that the threshold has been met, it is pushing back on the designation, saying in a rebuttal to rule makers that the platforms are actually relatively small compared to the competition in Europe and should be excluded. The EC has 45 working days to make a final determination about the designation, and Apple would have six months to comply, Reuters reported.

European antitrust regulators will now examine if the tech giant’s Maps and Ads units should be subject to stricter regulation. According to the DMA, when a platform reaches 45 million monthly active users and a market cap of €75 billion ($79 billion), it triggers the “gatekeeper” designation and additional rules apply.

While Apple notified regulators that the threshold has been met, it is pushing back on the designation, saying in a rebuttal to rule makers that the platforms are actually relatively small compared to the competition in Europe and should be excluded. The EC has 45 working days to make a final determination about the designation, and Apple would have six months to comply, Reuters reported.

power
Jon Keegan

Delhi High Court says Apple could face $38 billion penalty in Indian antitrust case

India’s Delhi High Court says that Apple could face a penalty as high as $38 billion for what its investigators describe as abusive conduct” related to the tech giant’s app store, Reuters reports.

Apple is challenging the constitutionality of the country’s new antitrust law, taking specific issue with the fact that penalties are calculated based on companies’ total annual global revenue, rather than just revenue derived from India.

That global figure could mean fines as high as $38 billion, according to a court filing seen by Reuters.

The Competition Commission of India has not issued a final ruling in the case.

That global figure could mean fines as high as $38 billion, according to a court filing seen by Reuters.

The Competition Commission of India has not issued a final ruling in the case.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.