Power
power
Hyunsoo Rim

TIME names the “Architects of AI” as its Person of the Year for 2025

TIME just announced its Person of the Year… and it’s not a single person.  

The magazine selected the “Architects of AI” as its 2025 honoree, spotlighting the executives and engineers behind the year’s AI boom. One of the two covers features eight tech leaders perched on a steel beam — recreating the iconic “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper” photo from 1932 — including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, AMD’s Lisa Su, xAI’s Elon Musk, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at the center, whose chips power many of today’s AI models.

The magazine frames 2025 as the year when AI’s “full potential roared into view,” with data center constructions surging and companies crossing new valuation thresholds — while also noting growing fears of a bubble, debt-funded build-outs, and lawsuits over chatbot harms.

Prediction markets had been leaning nonhuman, with Polymarket (47%) and Kalshi (55%) both assigning the highest odds not to any one person but to “AI,” ahead of Huang, Altman, or even Pope Leo XIV, per Business Insider. Many of those bettors weren’t far off in the end — though that may be of little consolation given that the market for “Artificial Intelligence” on Polymarket resolved to “No.”

TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR
Sherwood News

Indeed, the 102-year-old magazine has chosen a group of people or even a nonhuman concept before, as TIME has long defined the award as recognizing “the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill,” according to former Managing Editor Walter Isaacson.

Across its selections since 1927, 20 awards have gone to groups or conceptual forces, including “The Apollo 8 astronauts” in 1968; “The Computer” in 1982, when TIME first broke tradition to honor the rapid rise of personal computing; “The Whistleblowers,” who exposed corporate fraud at Enron and WorldCom, in 2002; and “The Spirit of Ukraine” in 2022. 

Previously titled the “Man of the Year” award until 1999, the accolade has recognized a handful of women so far — including Queen Elizabeth II in 1952, Angela Merkel in 2015, and Taylor Swift, the most recent female recipient at age 33, in 2023.

The magazine frames 2025 as the year when AI’s “full potential roared into view,” with data center constructions surging and companies crossing new valuation thresholds — while also noting growing fears of a bubble, debt-funded build-outs, and lawsuits over chatbot harms.

Prediction markets had been leaning nonhuman, with Polymarket (47%) and Kalshi (55%) both assigning the highest odds not to any one person but to “AI,” ahead of Huang, Altman, or even Pope Leo XIV, per Business Insider. Many of those bettors weren’t far off in the end — though that may be of little consolation given that the market for “Artificial Intelligence” on Polymarket resolved to “No.”

TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR
Sherwood News

Indeed, the 102-year-old magazine has chosen a group of people or even a nonhuman concept before, as TIME has long defined the award as recognizing “the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill,” according to former Managing Editor Walter Isaacson.

Across its selections since 1927, 20 awards have gone to groups or conceptual forces, including “The Apollo 8 astronauts” in 1968; “The Computer” in 1982, when TIME first broke tradition to honor the rapid rise of personal computing; “The Whistleblowers,” who exposed corporate fraud at Enron and WorldCom, in 2002; and “The Spirit of Ukraine” in 2022. 

Previously titled the “Man of the Year” award until 1999, the accolade has recognized a handful of women so far — including Queen Elizabeth II in 1952, Angela Merkel in 2015, and Taylor Swift, the most recent female recipient at age 33, in 2023.

More Power

See all Power
power

OpenAI is reportedly working with Pentagon to hash out guardrails amid Anthropic standoff over AI safety

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the company is working with the Pentagon to negotiate safety guardrails for AI models used in the battlefield, which comes as one of its top competitors, Anthropic, is at a standoff with the government.

According to a memo obtained by several media outlets, Altman told staff OpenAI believes “that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions. These are our main red lines.”

Anthropic, the company behind the AI chatbot Claude, was one of several firms that received a $200 million contract from the Department of Defense for “agentic workflows.”

Since then, tensions between Anthropic and the Pentagon have reportedly risen as the startup insists on surveillance restrictions. The government’s attack on Venezuela last month that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Anthropic has until 5:01 p.m. ET on Friday to reach a deal with the Pentagon, which has threatened consequences against the company if it doesn’t allow the government unrestricted use.

Altman’s comments come as the Financial Times reports that executives at Amazon, Google, and Microsoft are being pushed by workers to support Anthropic in its dispute with the Pentagon and adopt similar guardrails as the Claude company in any work they undertake with the US military.

According to a memo obtained by several media outlets, Altman told staff OpenAI believes “that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions. These are our main red lines.”

Anthropic, the company behind the AI chatbot Claude, was one of several firms that received a $200 million contract from the Department of Defense for “agentic workflows.”

Since then, tensions between Anthropic and the Pentagon have reportedly risen as the startup insists on surveillance restrictions. The government’s attack on Venezuela last month that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Anthropic has until 5:01 p.m. ET on Friday to reach a deal with the Pentagon, which has threatened consequences against the company if it doesn’t allow the government unrestricted use.

Altman’s comments come as the Financial Times reports that executives at Amazon, Google, and Microsoft are being pushed by workers to support Anthropic in its dispute with the Pentagon and adopt similar guardrails as the Claude company in any work they undertake with the US military.

power
Jon Keegan

Report: Anthropic CEO Amodei meeting with Hegseth at the Pentagon as tensions mount

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been summoned to meet with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon on Tuesday, according to a report from Axios. Tensions are running high between the Trump administration and Anthropic, as the startup’s surveillance restrictions on the use of its AI are reportedly causing outrage within the Pentagon.

Last month’s attack on Venezuela that led to the capture of Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Per the report, the Pentagon is considering effectively blacklisting Anthropic’s AI from government work if it doesn’t capitulate to the administration’s terms.

Antagonizing the Trump administration could cause Anthropic to face potential regulatory hurdles as it races toward an IPO this year. The company recently hired former Microsoft CFO Chris Liddel to its board, who formerly served as deputy White House chief of staff in the first Trump administration.

Last month’s attack on Venezuela that led to the capture of Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Per the report, the Pentagon is considering effectively blacklisting Anthropic’s AI from government work if it doesn’t capitulate to the administration’s terms.

Antagonizing the Trump administration could cause Anthropic to face potential regulatory hurdles as it races toward an IPO this year. The company recently hired former Microsoft CFO Chris Liddel to its board, who formerly served as deputy White House chief of staff in the first Trump administration.

power
Jon Keegan

Anthropic donates $20 million to pro-AI regulation PAC

The war to build a better AI model may be mostly happening in Silicon Valley, but now another important front has opened: Washington, DC.

Anthropic announced a $20 million donation to Public First Action, a new super PAC that advocates for AI policies and regulations that prioritize public safety. The PAC describes itself as “a counterforce that will defend the public interest against those who aim to buy their way out of sensible rule-making.”

The move is seen as a counter to OpenAI’s growing investments in PACs that argue for less AI regulation.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.