Power
President Trump Holds "Make America Wealthy Again Event" In White House Rose Garden
President Donald Trump, April 2, 2025 (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Trump’s new levies could drive US tariff rates to their highest in over a century, economists say

Economists at Goldman Sachs and Yale’s Budget Lab warn that the effective US tariff rate could rise by nearly 20 percentage points.

President Trump’s newly unveiled “reciprocal” tariffs could lift the US tariff rate to levels not seen in more than a century, according to economists. Stock markets sold off around the world, and both the SPDR S&P 500 Trust and tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, tracked by ETFs like the Invesco QQQ Trust, have opened down sharply this morning.

The sweeping new measures target most major US trading partners (excluding Canada and Mexico) with rates ranging from 50% on the tiny French territory of Saint Pierre and Miquelon (population of ~6,000) to 20% on the European Union and 10% baseline on all countries.

Even a few uninhabited islands didn’t escape the import taxes.

In a note published last night, Goldman Sachs analysts, led by the firm’s Chief Economist Jan Hatzius, estimated that this year’s tariff actions could raise the US effective tariff rate by 18.8 percentage points, up from their earlier forecast of 15 percentage points. That would push the rate into the 21% to 22% range — the highest since 1909, according to data from Yale University’s Budget Lab.

Effective tariff rates
Sherwood News

While Canada and Mexico received “better treatment” than expected, spared from further hikes and remaining at the 25% level announced earlier this year, Asian exporters took a sharper hit: China now faces a 34% reciprocal tariff, bringing its total tariff burden to 54% when added to the earlier 20%. Vietnam was hit with a 46% rate, while Thailand and Taiwan face 36% and 32%, respectively.

Those numbers could climb even higher. Roughly one-third of imported goods — about $1.1 trillion worth — are excluded from yesterday’s tariffs, including steel, autos, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and lumber, which softened the immediate impact. Goldman warns that sectoral tariffs targeting these industries could come later this year with “high probability,” which would push the effective tariff rate up further. And that’s without considering the second-order effects of potential retaliation.

Other analysts have given similar estimates: Bloomberg Economics puts the average effective US tariff rate at 23%, while Yale’s Budget Lab puts it at 22.5%.

With markets falling this morning, Wall Street’s new strategy: hope that these tariffs aren’t real.

More Power

See all Power
power

TIME names the “Architects of AI” as its Person of the Year for 2025

TIME just announced its Person of the Year… and it’s not a single person.  

The magazine selected the “Architects of AI” as its 2025 honoree, spotlighting the executives and engineers behind the year’s AI boom. One of the two covers features eight tech leaders perched on a steel beam — recreating the iconic “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper” photo from 1932 — including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, AMD’s Lisa Su, xAI’s Elon Musk, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at the center, whose chips power many of today’s AI models.

Western Auctioneer with Two Fingers up and Gavel in Hand

As investors pick sides in Netflix vs. Paramount, analysts say a renewed Warner Bros. bidding war looks inevitable

Analysts at Bloomberg on Wednesday said Paramount’s WBD hostile takeover offer could go as high as $35 per share.

Netflix WBD CEOs

The Netflix-Warner Bros. deal now faces a wall of opposition

Netflix will owe Warner Bros. $5.8 billion in cash if the deal is terminated on antitrust grounds.

power
Jon Keegan

The New York Times, Chicago Tribune sue Perplexity

The New York Times is suing the AI search engine startup Perplexity, alleging repeated copyright violations.

In the complaint, the Times accuses Perplexity of scraping the company’s content and generating outputs that are “identical or substantially similar” to Times content:

“Upon information and belief, Perplexity has unlawfully copied, distributed, and displayed millions of copyrighted Times stories, videos, podcasts, images and other works to power its products and tools.”

The Times also alleges that Perplexity’s AI tool generates “hallucinations” and falsely attribute them to the Times, creating confusion that harms the company’s brand.

In a separate suit filed Thursday, the Chicago Tribune accused Perplexity of similar copyright violations.

Perplexity’s “answer engine” made early inroads in an attempt to replace traditional web searches with AI-powered responses, but its larger competitors such as OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have been adding similar features. OpenAI recently released its own AI-powered web browser, ChatGPT Atlas, which challenges Perplexity’s Comet browser.

Jesse Dwyer, Head of Communication for Perplexity told Sherwood News in a statement:

“Publishers have been suing new tech companies for a hundred years, starting with radio, TV, the internet, social media and now AI. Fortunately it’s never worked, or we’d all be talking about this by telegraph.”

“Upon information and belief, Perplexity has unlawfully copied, distributed, and displayed millions of copyrighted Times stories, videos, podcasts, images and other works to power its products and tools.”

The Times also alleges that Perplexity’s AI tool generates “hallucinations” and falsely attribute them to the Times, creating confusion that harms the company’s brand.

In a separate suit filed Thursday, the Chicago Tribune accused Perplexity of similar copyright violations.

Perplexity’s “answer engine” made early inroads in an attempt to replace traditional web searches with AI-powered responses, but its larger competitors such as OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have been adding similar features. OpenAI recently released its own AI-powered web browser, ChatGPT Atlas, which challenges Perplexity’s Comet browser.

Jesse Dwyer, Head of Communication for Perplexity told Sherwood News in a statement:

“Publishers have been suing new tech companies for a hundred years, starting with radio, TV, the internet, social media and now AI. Fortunately it’s never worked, or we’d all be talking about this by telegraph.”

power
Jon Keegan

European regulators will examine if Apple’s maps and ads businesses require stricter oversight

Apple has notified European regulators that its Apple Maps and Apple Ads platforms meet the threshold to be called “gatekeepers” under the European Commission’s Digital Markets Act, the European Commission said.

European antitrust regulators will now examine if the tech giant’s Maps and Ads units should be subject to stricter regulation. According to the DMA, when a platform reaches 45 million monthly active users and a market cap of €75 billion ($79 billion), it triggers the “gatekeeper” designation and additional rules apply.

While Apple notified regulators that the threshold has been met, it is pushing back on the designation, saying in a rebuttal to rule makers that the platforms are actually relatively small compared to the competition in Europe and should be excluded. The EC has 45 working days to make a final determination about the designation, and Apple would have six months to comply, Reuters reported.

European antitrust regulators will now examine if the tech giant’s Maps and Ads units should be subject to stricter regulation. According to the DMA, when a platform reaches 45 million monthly active users and a market cap of €75 billion ($79 billion), it triggers the “gatekeeper” designation and additional rules apply.

While Apple notified regulators that the threshold has been met, it is pushing back on the designation, saying in a rebuttal to rule makers that the platforms are actually relatively small compared to the competition in Europe and should be excluded. The EC has 45 working days to make a final determination about the designation, and Apple would have six months to comply, Reuters reported.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.