Markets
Out of balance
Perfectly balanced? (Getty Images)
PREMIA DONNA

You’re getting paid nothing for risking money in the stock market, per the equity risk premium

Yeah, stocks are still on a 4% or higher earnings yield... but when bonds offer the same, what do you do?

Matt Phillips
8/1/25 7:27AM

Companies are risky. They blow up, go bankrupt, and equity holders tend to get paid last when that happens.

That’s why investors putting their money in stocks, rather than safe government bonds, have typically required a sweetener — known by some as the equity risk premium — to reward their bravery.

But that extra return has now vanished, the latest data point confirming the speculative character of the stock market at the moment.

First things first: what is the equity risk premium (ERP), exactly? It’s a method of comparing potential returns on bonds, measured in yields, with the potential return on stocks, represented by something called “earnings yields.” Earnings yields reimagine a share as a kind of bond, with expected earnings as the “yield.” If a stock costs $100 and is expected to make $4 in profit, it’s got a 4% earnings yield.

(Full disclosure: there are many variants of ERP. We’re going to use one of the most basic, subtracting the 10-year nominal Treasury yield from the earnings yield on the S&P 500.)

In theory, when earnings yields are higher than Treasury yields, that extra cushion should coax people to buy stocks. But at roughly zero, the list of reasons to buy the market, at least as far theoretical fundamentals are concerned, gets very short.

But who needs rational reasons right now! This gets at another way to think about ERP: as a gauge of investor risk appetite. As NYU professor Aswath Damodaran, the godfather of valuation geeks, explained in a recent paper, “​As investors become more risk averse, equity risk premiums will climb, and as risk aversion declines, equity risk premiums will fall.”

In other words, the vanishing risk premium — along with meme stocks, options trading, outperforming unprofitable companies, and passing references to “euphoria” from Wall Street analysts — is another data point on the speculative brouhaha now unfolding. 

That doesn’t mean a stock market crash is imminent. But at some point, market risk seemingly high and rewards low, the safety of bonds might start to look a little more attractive.

More Markets

See all Markets
Western Digital Seagate Technology Rise to top of S&P 500

Data storage is so hot right now

A rapid turnaround in profitability helps explain how Seagate Technology and Western Digital have clawed to the top of S&P 500 this year.

markets

Why Apple usually falls on a new iPhone launch

You can only shock the world so many times, and a thinner phone with a better camera isn’t always going to cut it.

That, in short, is why Apple has tended to go down on days when it’s introduced a new iPhone to the world, as this great chart from Bespoke Investment Group shows:

Bespoke iPhone announcement Apple performance
Source: Bespoke Investment Group

On average, the tech giant falls 0.4% on the release date and is negative more than 70% of the time, perhaps a useful tidbit on this, the day of the iPhone 17 launch.

One more thing....

A potentially complicating factor to the aforementioned data is that Apple has often done quite well in the six months leading up to a new iPhone announcement, roughly 5 percentage points better than its typical six-month return, as shown above. That’s not the case this time, with Apple shares up about 5% over the past six months compared to a typical near 20% advance in the prelude to a new iPhone drop.

So it’s not like expectations about how big of a catalyst this can be for the company are sky-high and due for a sharp retrenchment, especially given Apple’s relatively lackluster progress in developing AI capabilities relative to its megacap tech peers. But a seemingly low bar to clear hasn’t necessarily been a boon for the company on the big day, either.

In any event, staring too closely at the minutiae of all this may be missing the forest for the trees.

“While this info may be helpful to traders, we doubt its something that long-term shareholders are too worried about given the huge compounding returns the stock has provided during the iPhone era,” Bespoke wrote.

markets

Planet Labs slips after big post-earnings gain

Smallish midcap satellite imagery and data company Planet Labs is giving back a chunk of the nearly 50% gain it racked up after posting earnings early Monday.

No tears, though: the shares, which seem to have a fairly robust retail following, are still up roughly 340% over the past 12 months.

markets

CoreWeave soars as Microsoft’s deal with Nebius shows unrelenting demand for AI compute

CoreWeave is soaring as Microsoft’s $17.4 billion deal with Nebius shows the immense value and continued demand for all parts of the AI data center ecosystem.

One additional reason for CoreWeave’s jump may be that its pending acquisition of AI data center infrastructure company Core Scientific looks like a great deal compared to Microsoft’s renting of (more broad and advanced) AI data center capacity from Nebius.

CoreWeave’s all-stock deal to buy Core Scientific was initially valued at ~$9 billion, but with the subsequent decline in its shares, it’s worth about 40% less. And in purchasing Core Scientific, CoreWeave is saving $10 billion in what it would have paid the company to lease data center infrastructure over the next 12 years.

As it stands, Microsoft is getting about 300 megawatts in data center power capacity from Nebius, while Core Scientific boasts that its footprint is in excess of 1,300 megawatts. So, on the surface, it looks like an absolute steal for CoreWeave.

But again, this is not an apples-to-apples comparison; not all access to AI computing infrastructure is created equal.

There are differences in the type of AI infrastructure provided by the two: Nebius owns GPUs, while Core Scientific doesn’t, and what it provides in the software layer isn’t offered by Core Scientific as a stand-alone entity. This is the difference between the “full stack” approach (Nebius) and a “colocation” approach (Core Scientific).

That being said, CoreWeave’s acquisition of Core Scientific, once completed, will make the combined entity’s business model look more like Nebius’ model, which, as Microsoft just told us, is something that top hyperscalers are willing to pay a pretty penny for.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.