Markets

Market Theory

IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY

“Upon closer inspection ... this link is murky.”

Money in fist
Getty Images

So why do we care about the stock market?

What we talk about when we talk about stocks.

4/9/24 7:09AM


If you read business news, you hear it constantly. 

  • “The S&P 500 has been on a tear since Nov. 1, rallying some 20% on the back of strong earnings, economic optimism, and... ” (WSJ)

  • “The U.S. stock market is off to a soaring start in 2024, as optimism over the economy and interest rate cuts has combined with... ” (Reuters)

  • Optimism about the U.S. economy sends stocks to a new record... ” (NPR)

A lot of what gets written about the stock market assumes a clear connection between rising price in the equity market and an improving economy.

I’ve been covering financial markets for 15 years at The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Axios, and a few other spots. I’ve probably included the same implicit logic in stories hundreds of times.

But here’s the thing. It’s really not true.

For a century now — since the Wall Street boom of the 1920s — Americans have conflated the market with the economy, in a mass socio-cultural confusion of correlation and causation.

It started as a freak of history. In the 1920s, the US economy surged as America emerged from World War I as the world’s top economic power.

At the same time, the stock market saw a massive boom unlike any before. Using another new technology, modern advertising techniques, Wall Street managed to persuade Americans — many of whom were enjoying the novel experience of having a little extra cash in their pockets — to buy stocks for the first time. It worked. The 1920s bull market was born. 

Then came the Crash of ’29, followed by the Great Depression, a one-two punch that strengthened the linkage between the fate of the economy and the path of the market in the American psyche. 

The thing is, economists have looked for ironclad proof that the stock market has some sort of relationship to the economy for years. They’ve largely come up short.

One of the most widely cited surveys papers, summing up all the economic literature on the ability of financial market movements to predict economic growth, said that while economists have often noted some sort of link between stocks and growth, “upon closer inspection, however, this link is murky.”

“Stock returns generally do not have substantial… predictive content for future output,” said the paper, published in the American Economic Association’s Journal of Economic Literature in 2003. 

A separate 2010 paper by a bunch of well-known economists looking at the predictive power of a range of financial indicators found that the stock market “outperformed” other indicators in prediction, but none of their indicators were especially great. 

OK, so maybe markets don’t predict growth. That’s somewhat inconvenient, seeing as they’re widely credited with being “forward-looking.” But maybe they simply reflect economic growth in real time? 

Nope, not according to a 2005 paper in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, which actually found a negative relationship between actual economic growth and investment returns, in a long-term study of 19 countries. That means they found stocks typically rose when the economy worsened, and vice versa.

So where does this leave us? If the stock market doesn’t tell us about the economy, does the stock market matter? Are we giving stocks too much attention? Does the market really matter?

That’s sort of like asking if sports matter. They do. Not to everybody. Not all the time.

But if you find them fascinating; if you’re interested in strategy and competition; if you have a particular rooting interest; if you’re interested in human behavior, or in mass psychology, or new trends, or great stories, they matter.

And let’s just be honest. Sports also matter to a lot of people who gamble on them. They can cost you — or make you — money. The US does have a record high share of households, 58%, who own stocks. (On the other hand, the vast majority of those holdings are pretty small. More than 90% of the stock owned by households belongs to the richest 10% of American families.)

So yes, the markets matter. Not because they’re some magic barometer that can tell the economic future. But because they’re an incredibly rich source of information and great stories about the world right now.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Dave & Buster’s tanks as same-store sales keep falling and profit plunges

Dave & Buster’s fell more than 18% in premarket trading on Tuesday, following the arcade and restaurant chain’s second-quarter earnings report after the bell on Monday.

The chain, which has struggled through a discretionary spending cutback by consumers and an industry-wide tariff hit on prizes, posted a 3% drop in same-store sales on the quarter. That’s D&B’s 10th straight quarter of declining same-store sales.

Dave & Buster’s posted adjusted earnings of $0.40 per share, well below analyst estimates of $0.92 per share. The company’s adjusted profit, $14.1 million, was down 69% from last year.

CEO Tarun Lal blamed too many promotions, a decline in TV ad spend, and an almost 80% pullback in new games for the poor performance. In the food division, Lal said the company “leaned too heavily on appetizers and shareables.”

markets

Institutional investors are the most bullish since the February peak in stocks, and no longer think a trade war is the biggest risk out there

The trade war is over and risk appetite is high.

That’s the message from Bank of America’s September survey of fund managers with $426 billion in assets, who are collectively their most optimistic since February 2025 (an intermediate peak for the S&P 500).

 BofA FMS August

Key to this view seems to be that investors have capitulated on the idea that higher prices on US imports and disruptions to cross-border trade are the top threat to economic activity. “Trade war triggers global recession” was deemed the No. 1 tail risk from the February through August surveys. It’s now No. 4, trailing a second wave of inflation, the loss of Fed independence/US dollar debasement, and a disorderly rise in bond yields.

Positioning among institutional investors is “starting to close the gap to retail investors’ stock allocation,” Bank of America Chief Investment Strategist Michael Hartnett wrote.

BofA positioning

Implicit in this increasing bullishness is a desire for companies to take part in the AI boom and invest for growth and efficiency.

“Asked what companies should do with their cash flow, 39% of fund manager survey investors said they want companies to increase capital spending (the most since Dec’24) while 27% said they want companies to improve balance sheets (lowest since Feb22),” Hartnett wrote.

BofA FMS capex
markets

Oscar Health slips after announcing a $355 million convertible note offering

Oscar Health fell as much as 5.1% in premarket trading on Tuesday after the company announced it will terminate its revolving credit line with Wells Fargo thanks to a $355 million proposed private convertible note offering.

The company announced it will offer $355 million in 2.25% convertible senior subordinated notes maturing in 2030. Oscar said the raise will fund “general corporate purposes, including future expansion opportunities fueled by strategic AI and member experience initiatives as well as the potential extension of enhanced premium tax credits.”

Oscar, like many health insurance companies that offer government-sponsored plans, has had a tumultuous year amid rising costs. The company recently reiterated its full-year guidance after making a huge cut in July.

markets

Analysts on hard drives: “Supply remains tight”

Bank of America analysts bumped up price targets for hard disk drive (HDD) industry leaders — and S&P 500 top stocks — Seagate Technology Holdings and Western Digital as surging AI data center demand for these low-cost, long-term data storage devices continues to ramp up. They wrote:

“We raise our calendar year hard disk drive exabyte shipment forecast to 1,602 exabytes (+28% y/y) from 1,575 exabytes (+26% y/y) and see room for further upside as demand continues to outpace supply. Despite double digit percentage increases in total capacity... from STX & WDC so far during C25, HDD industry supply remains tight.”

BofA boosted its price target for Seagate from $170 a share to $215, slightly above where the stock is trading on Monday. The analysts also increased their stock price target on Western Digital from $100 to $123, implying a roughly 20% premium to where its share were trading Monday afternoon shortly before 2 p.m. ET.

Besides being an influential market driver this year, demand for hard disk data storage also reflects the vast amounts of data that the boom in AI is expected to generate. (A single exabyte is the equivalent of 1 billion gigabytes.)

As a result, hard drive makers like Seagate and Western are focusing on the next generation of high-capacity data storage gizmos that pack more data bits. These devices are also more profitable than traditional disk drives, which has helped to boost the profitability of the industry, BofA analysts said.

“As HDD demand continues to outpace supply, STX & WDC have seen profitability metrics hit all-time highs,” they wrote.

Those profitability metrics could help explain why the stocks have suddenly caught the fancy of traders.

“We estimate that STX & WDC can get above 42-43% corp gross margin levels exiting [calendar year 2028],” they wrote. “But if pricing is stronger than expected or if manufacturing efficiencies lower COGS, we believe margins could go even higher. Key risks include pause in hyperscaler capex (low probability) and tariffs.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.