Markets
Woman with shocked facial expression
The market is doing what, exactly? (Getty Images)
Grin and bear it

Everything is deep red today — which stocks are most, and least, sensitive to a market crash?

Nvidia, cruise companies, and tech stocks are historically sensitive to the market. Defensive names like Campbell’s and General Mills might hold up if everything goes south.

The S&P 500 posted its biggest daily loss of the year on Monday after President Trump confirmed his tariff plans: 25% on Canada and Mexico and a doubling of levies on China to 20%, starting today.

And in early trading on Tuesday, investors have picked up right where they left off, with a flurry of sell orders sending markets deep into the red and the S&P 500 Index down 1.5% at the time of writing.

If you’re nervous that this latest market bump could turn into a broader meltdown, which stocks would be most likely to get dragged down with the S&P 500?

Before we get into it, lets define beta. Beta measures how sensitive a stock has historically been to the overall market. Sadly, its not a crystal ball, but just a useful tool to tell us about whats happened historically. A beta of 1 means that a stock has historically moved in line with the market, above 1 suggests that a stock has been more volatile than the market, and below 1, the opposite — the stock has typically moved less than the markets move.

With that in mind, based on a three-year look back, data from FactSet reveals which stocks have the highest beta to the S&P 500.

At the top of the list is cruise company Carnival, which, with a beta of 2.8, is even more correlated to the swings of the market than volatile AI leader Nvidia (2.4). Tesla, which has now shed almost all of its postelection gains, is 17th out of the ~500 names in the index, with a beta of 1.8. That means that, based on historical averages, if the market gained 1%, Tesla would jump 1.8%.

Other cruise stocks, like Norwegian and Royal Caribbean, also find themselves on the list of stocks most sensitive to the market, as does automaker Ford with a beta of 2.1. Highly cyclical companies, which need a stronger consumer to buy their discretionary products, might not be the safest part of the market to play in if you expect the red days to keep coming.

DEFENSE, DEFENSE

Meanwhile, sectors that traditionally perform well in uncertain times have held up better overall this year, with healthcare, real estate, and consumer staples the top three sectors in the S&P 500 so far this year.

Interestingly, however, topping the list of stocks with the lowest beta is aerospace and defense giant Northrop Grumman, with a very modestly negative beta — implying that the company’s stock usually takes no notice of what the market does, and on balance actually does the opposite more times than it follows the index.

Also in the “least sensitive” list are consumer staples names like Campbell’s and Kraft Heinz, companies that tend to sell foodstuffs that are sought after by folks with nuclear bunkers who are preparing for the end of the world.

Of course, correlations are just that: they’re correlations. They can tell us what has happened coincidentally in the past, but they don’t tell us why, and they aren’t always as useful as we’d like them to be in predicting the future. And, as the saying goes, “In a financial crisis, all correlations go to one.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Report: Boeing could unveil 500-jet order from China during Trump’s visit later this month

Shares of Boeing are up nearly 4% on Friday afternoon, following a Bloomberg report that the company could be close to finalizing a deal to sell 500 planes to China.

The deal was first reported in August and would be one of Boeing’s largest ever.

According to Bloomberg’s sources, the deal could be officially unveiled when President Trump travels to China at the end of the month. That trip could be delayed given the war in Iran. The deal, sources say, could still fall apart — similar language to when it was first reported on more than six months ago.

Boeing has been on the outside of the Chinese market, in terms of new orders, since 2019 amid escalating US-China trade tensions.

According to Bloomberg’s sources, the deal could be officially unveiled when President Trump travels to China at the end of the month. That trip could be delayed given the war in Iran. The deal, sources say, could still fall apart — similar language to when it was first reported on more than six months ago.

Boeing has been on the outside of the Chinese market, in terms of new orders, since 2019 amid escalating US-China trade tensions.

markets

Why software shares are withstanding the war jitters

The outbreak of the war in Iran has clearly rattled investors and created a few clear winners — mostly energy stocks — and losers — consumer staples, airlines, and, well, more or else everything else.

But there is one interesting outlier to that Manichaean market dynamic.

Software shares — often the same companies that the market was giving up for dead just a few weeks ago due to overexpectations of an AI-driven disruption — have been holding up remarkably well.

These companies, including Intuit, ServiceNow, Datadog, Snowflake, IBM, Workday, and Oracle, have actually had a pretty decent run since the war started with a combined US-Israeli attack on Iran last weekend.

A new note from RBC Capital’s Rishi Jaluria suggests this isn’t just a fluke. Looking at the performance of software stocks during periods of geopolitical stress and market volatility over the last 10 and 25 years, his team found that software shares appear fairly well insulated when these broader shocks hit. RBC wrote:

“The defensive nature of SaaS models and the mission-critical nature of many core software systems at the enterprise level (e.g., in the absence of mass layoffs that may create seat-based headwinds, geopolitical uncertainty and/or market volatility typically will not cause an enterprise CIO to consider ripping out their ERP, CRM, Cyber systems, etc.”

I briefly got Jaluria on the phone yesterday, and he explained a bit more about why he thinks investors might see software as a decent place to hide out from the current chaos.

“With everything in the Middle East, you have to think about not just oil and gas input prices but also supply chains,” he said. “With software, you’re not really thinking about that.”

In other words, there is no equivalent of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz that software investors have to worry about.

Others suggested that the near-term profitability of these giant software companies — aside from concerns about potential long-term disruption from AI — may look different in the face of the economic uncertainty that seems to be growing with the war, especially after a sell-off that has left them relatively attractively valued.

Mark Moerdler, who covers software stocks for Bernstein Research, says that while the AI worries are clearly real, software companies continue to be highly productive cash cows.

“Everyone is afraid that AI is a massive disruptor, and all these articles you read talk about AI as massive disruptor or the world is ending or whatever,” he said. “You don’t see it in the fundamental numbers of the companies I cover. They are delivering GAAP profits, free cash flow, and they’re good investment ideas.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.