Markets
Woman with shocked facial expression
The market is doing what, exactly? (Getty Images)
Grin and bear it

Everything is deep red today — which stocks are most, and least, sensitive to a market crash?

Nvidia, cruise companies, and tech stocks are historically sensitive to the market. Defensive names like Campbell’s and General Mills might hold up if everything goes south.

The S&P 500 posted its biggest daily loss of the year on Monday after President Trump confirmed his tariff plans: 25% on Canada and Mexico and a doubling of levies on China to 20%, starting today.

And in early trading on Tuesday, investors have picked up right where they left off, with a flurry of sell orders sending markets deep into the red and the S&P 500 Index down 1.5% at the time of writing.

If you’re nervous that this latest market bump could turn into a broader meltdown, which stocks would be most likely to get dragged down with the S&P 500?

Before we get into it, lets define beta. Beta measures how sensitive a stock has historically been to the overall market. Sadly, its not a crystal ball, but just a useful tool to tell us about whats happened historically. A beta of 1 means that a stock has historically moved in line with the market, above 1 suggests that a stock has been more volatile than the market, and below 1, the opposite — the stock has typically moved less than the markets move.

With that in mind, based on a three-year look back, data from FactSet reveals which stocks have the highest beta to the S&P 500.

At the top of the list is cruise company Carnival, which, with a beta of 2.8, is even more correlated to the swings of the market than volatile AI leader Nvidia (2.4). Tesla, which has now shed almost all of its postelection gains, is 17th out of the ~500 names in the index, with a beta of 1.8. That means that, based on historical averages, if the market gained 1%, Tesla would jump 1.8%.

Other cruise stocks, like Norwegian and Royal Caribbean, also find themselves on the list of stocks most sensitive to the market, as does automaker Ford with a beta of 2.1. Highly cyclical companies, which need a stronger consumer to buy their discretionary products, might not be the safest part of the market to play in if you expect the red days to keep coming.

DEFENSE, DEFENSE

Meanwhile, sectors that traditionally perform well in uncertain times have held up better overall this year, with healthcare, real estate, and consumer staples the top three sectors in the S&P 500 so far this year.

Interestingly, however, topping the list of stocks with the lowest beta is aerospace and defense giant Northrop Grumman, with a very modestly negative beta — implying that the company’s stock usually takes no notice of what the market does, and on balance actually does the opposite more times than it follows the index.

Also in the “least sensitive” list are consumer staples names like Campbell’s and Kraft Heinz, companies that tend to sell foodstuffs that are sought after by folks with nuclear bunkers who are preparing for the end of the world.

Of course, correlations are just that: they’re correlations. They can tell us what has happened coincidentally in the past, but they don’t tell us why, and they aren’t always as useful as we’d like them to be in predicting the future. And, as the saying goes, “In a financial crisis, all correlations go to one.”

More Markets

See all Markets
Western Digital Seagate Technology Rise to top of S&P 500

Data storage is so hot right now

A rapid turnaround in profitability helps explain how Seagate Technology and Western Digital have clawed to the top of S&P 500 this year.

markets

Why Apple usually falls on a new iPhone launch

You can only shock the world so many times, and a thinner phone with a better camera isn’t always going to cut it.

That, in short, is why Apple has tended to go down on days when it’s introduced a new iPhone to the world, as this great chart from Bespoke Investment Group shows:

Bespoke iPhone announcement Apple performance
Source: Bespoke Investment Group

On average, the tech giant falls 0.4% on the release date and is negative more than 70% of the time, perhaps a useful tidbit on this, the day of the iPhone 17 launch.

One more thing....

A potentially complicating factor to the aforementioned data is that Apple has often done quite well in the six months leading up to a new iPhone announcement, roughly 5 percentage points better than its typical six-month return, as shown above. That’s not the case this time, with Apple shares up about 5% over the past six months compared to a typical near 20% advance in the prelude to a new iPhone drop.

So it’s not like expectations about how big of a catalyst this can be for the company are sky-high and due for a sharp retrenchment, especially given Apple’s relatively lackluster progress in developing AI capabilities relative to its megacap tech peers. But a seemingly low bar to clear hasn’t necessarily been a boon for the company on the big day, either.

In any event, staring too closely at the minutiae of all this may be missing the forest for the trees.

“While this info may be helpful to traders, we doubt its something that long-term shareholders are too worried about given the huge compounding returns the stock has provided during the iPhone era,” Bespoke wrote.

markets

Planet Labs slips after big post-earnings gain

Smallish midcap satellite imagery and data company Planet Labs is giving back a chunk of the nearly 50% gain it racked up after posting earnings early Monday.

No tears, though: the shares, which seem to have a fairly robust retail following, are still up roughly 340% over the past 12 months.

markets

CoreWeave soars as Microsoft’s deal with Nebius shows unrelenting demand for AI compute

CoreWeave is soaring as Microsoft’s $17.4 billion deal with Nebius shows the immense value and continued demand for all parts of the AI data center ecosystem.

One additional reason for CoreWeave’s jump may be that its pending acquisition of AI data center infrastructure company Core Scientific looks like a great deal compared to Microsoft’s renting of (more broad and advanced) AI data center capacity from Nebius.

CoreWeave’s all-stock deal to buy Core Scientific was initially valued at ~$9 billion, but with the subsequent decline in its shares, it’s worth about 40% less. And in purchasing Core Scientific, CoreWeave is saving $10 billion in what it would have paid the company to lease data center infrastructure over the next 12 years.

As it stands, Microsoft is getting about 300 megawatts in data center power capacity from Nebius, while Core Scientific boasts that its footprint is in excess of 1,300 megawatts. So, on the surface, it looks like an absolute steal for CoreWeave.

But again, this is not an apples-to-apples comparison; not all access to AI computing infrastructure is created equal.

There are differences in the type of AI infrastructure provided by the two: Nebius owns GPUs, while Core Scientific doesn’t, and what it provides in the software layer isn’t offered by Core Scientific as a stand-alone entity. This is the difference between the “full stack” approach (Nebius) and a “colocation” approach (Core Scientific).

That being said, CoreWeave’s acquisition of Core Scientific, once completed, will make the combined entity’s business model look more like Nebius’ model, which, as Microsoft just told us, is something that top hyperscalers are willing to pay a pretty penny for.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.