Markets
Intel Earnings Researchers
(CSA Archive/Getty Images)

Wall Street analysts see some issues with Intel’s earnings

Even with the US government as a partial owner, Intel’s turnaround has a long way to go.

Intel shares lost most of their post-earning gains Friday as Wall Street analysts gave the company’s better-than-expected Q3 headline numbers a flinty-eyed examination. Here’s some of what they found.

The company’s long-standing business of selling the chips used in PCs and laptops — Intel’s Client Computing Group, or CCG, business unit — did better than expected.

Bernstein Research: “CCG revenues were particularly robust, >$400M above consensus driven by Windows 11 upgrade cycle and PC refresh and growing AI PC adoption.”

Mizuho: “We believe INTC continues to see tailwinds from the Win11 refresh and AI PC sales. INTC noted AI PC mix continues to ramp as it expects to exit 2025E with 100M AI cumulative AI PCs sold.”

Likewise, Intel’s Data Center and AI unit, where it sells chips for servers, also seemed to do pretty well, posting quarter-on-quarter growth of 5% to $4.1 billion.

There were some catches, however, with much of the growth driven by stronger-than-expected demand for the older Intel chips — often referred to by the shorthand Intel 7 or Intel 10, which refers to the size, in nanometers, of the process used to etch transistors onto silicon wafers.

Barclays: “Interestingly, the company pointed to supply constraints (likely to persist into 2026) and not being able to fully serve strong demand driven by AI workloads. A lot of the interest is still on older generation products at Intel 7 and Intel 10, where management is not intending to increase capacity and is attempting to transition customers to the new products (although is finding some difficulty).”

Bernstein Research: “Commentary around ‘demand exceeding supply’ on the surface sounds encouraging... However, supply constraints appear primarily on 10/7nm (where demand is higher because customers are less enthused by Intel’s newer products) and seems likely to cost further share.”

Meanwhile, the company’s struggling foundry business — where it manufactures chips made by other companies and competes against global leader TSMC — continues to flounder, as it attempts to convince large customers to adopt its next-generation “18A” chip production technology aimed at data centers that need high-performance chips.

Citi: Revenue from Intel Foundry (31% of 3Q25 sales) was $4.24 billion, down 4% QoQ, below our estimate of $4.55 billion driven by lower packaging sales... We believe investors think Intel’s merchant foundry business can be profitable, but we don’t given our belief that Intel’s foundry is years behind TSMC. We continue to believe Intel should exit the foundry business.

Bank of America: We dont expect a material improvement in the current unfavorable cost structure for Intel Foundry, given slow internal adoption of 18A node (peak capacity in 2030+) and foundry competition in the US.

Needham: INTC appears to be increasingly challenged in the overall data center market, as it seems wallet share is shifting away from general-compute to AI-compute.

On the brighter side, several analysts highlighted a far more optimistic tone by management.

It seems that the addition of the US government as a shareholder — which would seem to imply ongoing support for the company from the unusually activist Trump administration — as well as announcements of partnership deals with erstwhile competitor Nvidia and multibillion-dollar investments from politically connected investors like Japan’s SoftBank have done wonders for the outlook of Intel executives.

The additional cash, supplemented by the divesture of its Altera unit and sale of some of its stake in Mobileye, alongside the highly visible hand of the federal government as a partner has given CEO Lip-Bu Tan additional time and money as he tries to pull off one of the toughest corporate turnarounds in recent memory.

HSBC: “The overall narrative from Intel management was much more bullish on several fronts including better non-AI server demand recovery, AI chip product strategy, as well as more optimistic tone on its foundry outlook going into [fiscal year 2026]. The bullish narrative vs last quarter’s analyst meeting is unsurprising as the recent deal announcements by the US government, Softbank, and Nvidia are likely to give Intel management a boost of confidence along with an improving balance sheet.”

JPMorgan: “Significant cash infusions in Q3/Q4 (Softbank, NVDA, US govt, Altera, MBLY) help to shore up the company’s balance sheet (de-levering remains a top capital allocation priority) while providing support for the company’s major capex initiatives amid fairly constrained [free cash flow] levels over the next several quarters. We still, however, view Intel’s competitive positioning as fundamentally challenged for the next 12-18 months.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Goldman hikes year-end gold price forecast to $5,400/oz as private investors and central banks compete for the shiny stuff

Goldman Sachs has raised its December 2026 gold price forecast to $5,400 per ounce, up from the previous $4,900 target, citing strong demand from private sector investors using gold as a hedge against global policy risks, according to a note released late Tuesday.

The revised price target reflects a 17% increase from January's month-to-date average price, with continued central bank buying as the biggest driver of the forecast (accounting for 14pp of the expected appreciation), while ETF inflows add another 3pp — supported by an assumed Fed rate cut this year.

Central banks have been on a gold-buying spree since 2022, after the freezing of Russia's foreign reserves, helping push prices up 15% in 2023 and 26% in 2024. But Goldman analysts note that the rally accelerated in 2025 as competition between central banks and private investors for the limited bullion intensified — driving prices up another 67% last year, with recent tensions over Greenland only adding to the momentum.

That private-sector demand now extends well beyond ETF inflows. Goldman says buying is increasingly coming from a new class of investors seeking protection against macro-policy risk and currency "debasement," including purchases from high-net-worth families and call-option buying — flows that are "hard to track" but have become a "significant incremental source of demand."

Goldman assumes these macro-related "sticky" hedges will persist through 2026 — unlike those tied to the 2024 US election, which unwound quickly once the outcome was clear.

markets

Alibaba jumps on report of a potential IPO for its AI chipmaking division

Alibaba ADRs are up 5% in premarket trading on Thursday after Bloomberg reported that the cloud and e-commerce giant is preparing to list its chipmaking division, looking to capitalize on strong investor interest in AI.

Citing people familiar with the matter, the Chinese tech giant is reportedly looking to first restructure the unit, known as T-Head, into a partially employee-owned business, before exploring an IPO, though the specific timing for this process remains uncertain.

Though Alibaba’s IPO plans are still at an early stage, with T-Head’s valuation expectations still unclear, recent debuts by rival Chinese chipmakers like Moore Threads Technology have attracted strong interest from investors, jumping 400%+ on its first day after raising $1.13 billion.

Alibaba has also been investing aggressively into AI in the past year, committing more than $53 billion to develop its cloud and AI infrastructure. Last week, the company upgraded Qwen — its flagship AI app — to function more like an agentic chatbot able to place orders for food, book travel, and execute other tasks, as the company pushes further into consumer-facing AI.

Though Alibaba’s IPO plans are still at an early stage, with T-Head’s valuation expectations still unclear, recent debuts by rival Chinese chipmakers like Moore Threads Technology have attracted strong interest from investors, jumping 400%+ on its first day after raising $1.13 billion.

Alibaba has also been investing aggressively into AI in the past year, committing more than $53 billion to develop its cloud and AI infrastructure. Last week, the company upgraded Qwen — its flagship AI app — to function more like an agentic chatbot able to place orders for food, book travel, and execute other tasks, as the company pushes further into consumer-facing AI.

markets

GameStop jumps after CEO Ryan Cohen purchases another 500,000 shares

Ryan Cohen is putting his money where his mouth is.

The GameStop CEO bought another 500,000 shares of company stock for $10.8 million on Wednesday, per a filing.

The stock was trading higher on Wednesday thanks to Cohen’s purchase of 500,000 shares for roughly $10.6 million on Tuesday, extended the gains in the after-hours session on the news, and is now up 3% in premarket trading, as of 4:45 a.m. ET.

“The Reporting Person believes that it is essential for the Chief Executive Officer of any public company to purchase shares of such company in the open market with his or her own personal funds in order to further strengthen alignment with stockholders,” per the filing. “The Reporting Person believes that any Chief Executive Officer who fails to do so should be fired.”

Cohen is poised to become even more financially enmeshed with GameStop’s stock and operating performance should shareholders approve a package that would tie his pay completely to ambitious targets for the company’s earnings and market cap.

The CEO now owns about 8.56% of shares outstanding.

markets

AppLovin tumbles; company dismisses negative report as “false, misleading, and nonsensical”

AppLovin managed to finish Tuesday well off its lows after initially getting clobbered in the wake of an incendiary report published by CapitalWatch.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling the ad tech firm “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to launder funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling the ad tech firm “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to launder funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.