Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

Futures fall after President Trump announces new global tariff rate boosted to 15%

10% global tariffs will be 15% global tariffs.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, President Donald Trump said he was boosting the new levies slated to go into effect after the Supreme Court ruled against his reciprocal tariff regime. Stocks jolted lower on Sunday evening as traders digested the news, and remained in the red on Monday morning, with futures on the S&P 500 Index off 0.53% while contracts tied to the tech-heavier NDX are off 0.7%.

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 sets a ceiling of 15% on the tariff rate that can be imposed “to deal with large and serious United States balance-of-payments-deficits,” which was cited as part of the rationale for this measure.

This tax on imports can stay in place for 150 days; afterward, congressional approval would be required. It will not apply to a variety of different products, including energy, critical minerals, certain electronics, passenger vehicles, and goods that fall under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

In press interviews on the weekend, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described this global tariff as a “five-month bridge” during which time the administration will go through the process of enacting tariffs using alternative authorities.

JPMorgan estimates that the effective US tariff rate will fall modestly as a result of the end of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the utilization of Section 122.

“The macro impact of these developments shouldn’t be huge,” JPMorgan Chief US Economist Michael Feroli wrote. “This isn’t to say there won’t be headaches for importers juggling different tariff schedules, but the difference in the aggregate fiscal burden of the tariffs on domestic purchasers is not enough to have a big effect on our outlook.”

That being said, the US effective tariff rate has risen meaningfully during each of Trump’s terms in office: Trump Always Raises Tariffs (TART).

“President Trump really believes that tariffs work and that trade deficits are bad,” wrote Libby Cantrill, head of public policy at PIMCO. “Given the tools he has, we should expect tariff and trade policy uncertainty to last as long as Trump is in the White House.”

However, the smaller set of tools the president is being forced to work with has “substantially greater process constraints in place, meaning that the planning uncertainty for firms is reduced even if the administration is committed to reinstating some of the tariffs,” wrote Peter Williams, economist at 22V Research. “The whimsical nature of the process over the past year is gone and with it much of the day-to-day uncertainty.”

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 sets a ceiling of 15% on the tariff rate that can be imposed “to deal with large and serious United States balance-of-payments-deficits,” which was cited as part of the rationale for this measure.

This tax on imports can stay in place for 150 days; afterward, congressional approval would be required. It will not apply to a variety of different products, including energy, critical minerals, certain electronics, passenger vehicles, and goods that fall under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

In press interviews on the weekend, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described this global tariff as a “five-month bridge” during which time the administration will go through the process of enacting tariffs using alternative authorities.

JPMorgan estimates that the effective US tariff rate will fall modestly as a result of the end of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the utilization of Section 122.

“The macro impact of these developments shouldn’t be huge,” JPMorgan Chief US Economist Michael Feroli wrote. “This isn’t to say there won’t be headaches for importers juggling different tariff schedules, but the difference in the aggregate fiscal burden of the tariffs on domestic purchasers is not enough to have a big effect on our outlook.”

That being said, the US effective tariff rate has risen meaningfully during each of Trump’s terms in office: Trump Always Raises Tariffs (TART).

“President Trump really believes that tariffs work and that trade deficits are bad,” wrote Libby Cantrill, head of public policy at PIMCO. “Given the tools he has, we should expect tariff and trade policy uncertainty to last as long as Trump is in the White House.”

However, the smaller set of tools the president is being forced to work with has “substantially greater process constraints in place, meaning that the planning uncertainty for firms is reduced even if the administration is committed to reinstating some of the tariffs,” wrote Peter Williams, economist at 22V Research. “The whimsical nature of the process over the past year is gone and with it much of the day-to-day uncertainty.”

More Markets

See all Markets
Dickens, Great Expectations, He said, Aha! would you?

Tech tumbles as momentum stocks run into a blowout jobs report and a wave of profit-taking

The AI trade is under some pressure, taking prices back like... a few days. President Donald Trump is not a fan of the price action.

Trump Administration Considers Reclassifying Marijuana As A Less Dangerous Drug

Trulieve to list on NYSE, a first for US cannabis sector

More may be on the way: several other US cannabis companies have announced reverse stock splits with the intention of listing on a major exchange.

markets

Lululemon’s stretch getting tested: Stock plunges after after outlook is cut

Lululemon shares are down double digits in premarket trading after the company cut its full-year sales and profit outlook, overshadowing a Q1 beat and raising fresh concerns about the brand’s turnaround efforts.

The company now expects fiscal 2026 revenue to be flat to down 1%, compared with its prior forecast for 2% to 4% growth. Guidance for full-year diluted earnings per share was dragged down to a range of $10.95 to $11.15, below the company’s previous guidance of $12.10 to $12.30 and well below Wall Street’s estimate of $13.26.

Key numbers for Q1:

  • EPS of $1.69 vs. the $1.68 expected.

  • Revenue of $2.47 billion vs. the $2.43 billion expected.

The modest top-line beat masked a widening divergence between Lululemons geographic markets. While international revenue rose 22% overall with a 30% increase in Mainland China, the bigger problem remains North America, where revenue fell 5%.

Interim co-CEO and CFO Meghan Frank acknowledged during the earnings call that recent product rollouts underperformed. A highly anticipated yoga campaign failed to generate its expected halo effect across broader product lines.

Profitability metrics took a major hit, with gross margins contracting by 410 basis points to 54.2% due to mounting tariff costs and promotional markdowns. Operating income consequently fell 37% year over year to $276.9 million.

“We experienced spikes of negative commentary in the media and on social channels with regard to our brand, which had an impact on traffic and overall top-line performance,” Frank said during the earnings call. “And second, not all of our product launches have met our expectations. While we have had several successful launches so far this year, we have seen others as we start Q2 not generate the anticipated guest response.”

Lululemons valuation has already been steadily compressing for years. While it was once one of retails richly valued stocks, investors have been questioning whether the company can return to the double-digit growth era.

The results also arrive during a leadership transition. Lululemon announced back in April that former Nike executive Heidi ONeill is set to take over as CEO in September, with investors looking to her to revive growth in North America and restore the brands growth.

As Lululemon faces both macroeconomic pressure and brand-specific challenges, its stock has dropped around 40% year to date.

markets

US job growth skyrocketed in May, blasting past expectations

The US economy added 172,000 jobs in the month of May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday, sending 10-year Treasury yields higher.

The strong May job market surprised economists. Experts had predicted only 85,000 new jobs — just half the reported number. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as expected.

The job growth story is a hopeful spot for the economy as consumers continue to feel inflationary pressure from the Iran war.

Job gains were buoyed by the leisure and hospitality sector, which added 70,000 jobs, as well as local government, healthcare, and education.

Both the March and April jobs reports were revised upward, making them collectively 93,000 higher than previously reported.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.