Markets
markets

Quantum stocks soar after report that the Trump administration is in talks to invest directly in the sector

After speculation has swirled for weeks that the US government might consider investing in the quantum sector, discussions are now underway, with The Wall Street Journal reporting that the Trump administration is negotiating with several quantum computing companies about giving the US Commerce Department equity stakes in exchange for federal funding.

Companies in talks include IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum, with each seeking a minimum of $10 million in funding, per the report, while others like Quantum Computing and privately held Atom Computing consider similar arrangements. The deals “haven’t been completed and might change.”

These stocks soared double digits on the initial news, and IonQ and Rigetti were the second- and third-most-traded stocks in the premarket, trailing only Tesla.

Separate sources also appeared to contradict the report. Per Reuters, a US Commerce Department official said over email that it is “not currently negotiating with any of the companies.” Quantum computing stocks all pared some of their advances after Yahoo Finance reported that taking equity stakes is “not necessarily something the Trump administration is considering,” citing a person familiar with the matter, adding that these companies (and many others) have pitched the government on buying a position.

Per JPMorgan’s Arun Jain, retail traders “are actively participating in the sharp rebound of quantum stocks,” with net purchases of about $136 million in these four stocks through 11 a.m. ET.

D-Wave Quantum is leading the rally in the cohort, and that makes some fundamental sense: this news would constitute a bigger shift in how the government feels about this particular company relative to its peers.

D-Wave CEO Dr. Alan Baratz had previously expressed feeling left out in the cold by the US government because its most prominent quantum computing technology utilizes annealing models, while its peers use gate-based models. Back in May, he told us he “couldn’t even get a foot in the door” with the US government, calling its focus on gate-based models “profoundly disappointing.” Now, if these reports are realized, the government won’t just have its foot in the door; it’ll have a seat at D-Wave’s table.

Benchmark analyst David Williams said this “represents just one of several potential funding mechanisms likely to emerge as the US accelerates efforts to establish leadership in next-generation computing amid intensifying global competition, particularly from China,” citing figures from the Quantum Economic Development Consortium that show China’s public funding for the industry is roughly double that of the US.

“We believe these types of programs will further strengthen conviction in the quantum investment thesis, with growing public–private collaboration and policy support helping accelerate private-sector adoption, expand end-market applications, and drive the pace of innovation over the next several years,” he wrote.

The move builds on the government’s recent investments in important sectors: in July, the Defense Department took a 15% stake in rare earth miner MP Materials to become its largest shareholder, followed by the federal government acquiring a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel in August.

Indeed, the rally in quantum computing stocks in September was spurred in part by rumors that the US government was looking to step up its support for the industry. This measure under discussion would certainly be more aggressive than what followed by the end of the month, when the Trump administration highlighted quantum computing as a top R&D budgetary priority for fiscal 2027.

The funding, if finalized, would mark Washington’s first direct bet on the fast-growing quantum computing field, which promises to perform complex calculations far faster than today’s supercomputers, potentially accelerating breakthroughs in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, AI, and more.

The companies reportedly discussing the deals remain deeply unprofitable, with all four companies (D-Wave, Rigetti, IonQ, and Quantum Computing) posting net losses in their latest quarter — a fact that hasn’t stopped most of them from surging this year.

Companies in talks include IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum, with each seeking a minimum of $10 million in funding, per the report, while others like Quantum Computing and privately held Atom Computing consider similar arrangements. The deals “haven’t been completed and might change.”

These stocks soared double digits on the initial news, and IonQ and Rigetti were the second- and third-most-traded stocks in the premarket, trailing only Tesla.

Separate sources also appeared to contradict the report. Per Reuters, a US Commerce Department official said over email that it is “not currently negotiating with any of the companies.” Quantum computing stocks all pared some of their advances after Yahoo Finance reported that taking equity stakes is “not necessarily something the Trump administration is considering,” citing a person familiar with the matter, adding that these companies (and many others) have pitched the government on buying a position.

Per JPMorgan’s Arun Jain, retail traders “are actively participating in the sharp rebound of quantum stocks,” with net purchases of about $136 million in these four stocks through 11 a.m. ET.

D-Wave Quantum is leading the rally in the cohort, and that makes some fundamental sense: this news would constitute a bigger shift in how the government feels about this particular company relative to its peers.

D-Wave CEO Dr. Alan Baratz had previously expressed feeling left out in the cold by the US government because its most prominent quantum computing technology utilizes annealing models, while its peers use gate-based models. Back in May, he told us he “couldn’t even get a foot in the door” with the US government, calling its focus on gate-based models “profoundly disappointing.” Now, if these reports are realized, the government won’t just have its foot in the door; it’ll have a seat at D-Wave’s table.

Benchmark analyst David Williams said this “represents just one of several potential funding mechanisms likely to emerge as the US accelerates efforts to establish leadership in next-generation computing amid intensifying global competition, particularly from China,” citing figures from the Quantum Economic Development Consortium that show China’s public funding for the industry is roughly double that of the US.

“We believe these types of programs will further strengthen conviction in the quantum investment thesis, with growing public–private collaboration and policy support helping accelerate private-sector adoption, expand end-market applications, and drive the pace of innovation over the next several years,” he wrote.

The move builds on the government’s recent investments in important sectors: in July, the Defense Department took a 15% stake in rare earth miner MP Materials to become its largest shareholder, followed by the federal government acquiring a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel in August.

Indeed, the rally in quantum computing stocks in September was spurred in part by rumors that the US government was looking to step up its support for the industry. This measure under discussion would certainly be more aggressive than what followed by the end of the month, when the Trump administration highlighted quantum computing as a top R&D budgetary priority for fiscal 2027.

The funding, if finalized, would mark Washington’s first direct bet on the fast-growing quantum computing field, which promises to perform complex calculations far faster than today’s supercomputers, potentially accelerating breakthroughs in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, AI, and more.

The companies reportedly discussing the deals remain deeply unprofitable, with all four companies (D-Wave, Rigetti, IonQ, and Quantum Computing) posting net losses in their latest quarter — a fact that hasn’t stopped most of them from surging this year.

More Markets

See all Markets
Dickens, Great Expectations, He said, Aha! would you?

Tech tumbles as momentum stocks run into a blowout jobs report and a wave of profit-taking

The AI trade is under some pressure, taking prices back like... a few days. President Donald Trump is not a fan of the price action.

Trump Administration Considers Reclassifying Marijuana As A Less Dangerous Drug

Trulieve to list on NYSE, a first for US cannabis sector

More may be on the way: several other US cannabis companies have announced reverse stock splits with the intention of listing on a major exchange.

markets

Lululemon’s stretch getting tested: Stock plunges after after outlook is cut

Lululemon shares are down double digits in premarket trading after the company cut its full-year sales and profit outlook, overshadowing a Q1 beat and raising fresh concerns about the brand’s turnaround efforts.

The company now expects fiscal 2026 revenue to be flat to down 1%, compared with its prior forecast for 2% to 4% growth. Guidance for full-year diluted earnings per share was dragged down to a range of $10.95 to $11.15, below the company’s previous guidance of $12.10 to $12.30 and well below Wall Street’s estimate of $13.26.

Key numbers for Q1:

  • EPS of $1.69 vs. the $1.68 expected.

  • Revenue of $2.47 billion vs. the $2.43 billion expected.

The modest top-line beat masked a widening divergence between Lululemons geographic markets. While international revenue rose 22% overall with a 30% increase in Mainland China, the bigger problem remains North America, where revenue fell 5%.

Interim co-CEO and CFO Meghan Frank acknowledged during the earnings call that recent product rollouts underperformed. A highly anticipated yoga campaign failed to generate its expected halo effect across broader product lines.

Profitability metrics took a major hit, with gross margins contracting by 410 basis points to 54.2% due to mounting tariff costs and promotional markdowns. Operating income consequently fell 37% year over year to $276.9 million.

“We experienced spikes of negative commentary in the media and on social channels with regard to our brand, which had an impact on traffic and overall top-line performance,” Frank said during the earnings call. “And second, not all of our product launches have met our expectations. While we have had several successful launches so far this year, we have seen others as we start Q2 not generate the anticipated guest response.”

Lululemons valuation has already been steadily compressing for years. While it was once one of retails richly valued stocks, investors have been questioning whether the company can return to the double-digit growth era.

The results also arrive during a leadership transition. Lululemon announced back in April that former Nike executive Heidi ONeill is set to take over as CEO in September, with investors looking to her to revive growth in North America and restore the brands growth.

As Lululemon faces both macroeconomic pressure and brand-specific challenges, its stock has dropped around 40% year to date.

markets

US job growth skyrocketed in May, blasting past expectations

The US economy added 172,000 jobs in the month of May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday, sending 10-year Treasury yields higher.

The strong May job market surprised economists. Experts had predicted only 85,000 new jobs — just half the reported number. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as expected.

The job growth story is a hopeful spot for the economy as consumers continue to feel inflationary pressure from the Iran war.

Job gains were buoyed by the leisure and hospitality sector, which added 70,000 jobs, as well as local government, healthcare, and education.

Both the March and April jobs reports were revised upward, making them collectively 93,000 higher than previously reported.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.