Markets
markets

Opendoor surges after trading firm Jane Street reveals 5.9% stake

Shares in retail darling Opendoor Technologies are 8% higher in early trading on Thursday after proprietary trading firm Jane Street revealed a 5.9% stake in the company in a new filing, equivalent to beneficial ownership of more than 44 million shares. At current prices, that’s a position worth $390 million and change.

Many Opendoor bulls are cheering this announcement as vindication from a major institution and a material positive catalyst for the online real estate company. The reality is much less clear and considerably more nuanced. Jane Street is a firm that specializes in market-making and holds a 5% stake or more in 221 US publicly traded securities, per Bloomberg data. It is impossible to know what Jane Street’s true net Opendoor exposure is, since its options positions are not disclosed. No one but Jane Street knows that.

If we had to make an educated speculation, this stock position is much more likely to be a hedge related to calls Jane Street may have sold on Opendoor than it is a plain vanilla expression of optimism on the company’s prospects.

(There is a certain irony that, in this scenario, traders’ reaction to the revelation of a hedge serves as something that immediately makes that hedge more useful!)

The stake is owned by a number of different Jane Street Group subsidiaries. Jane Street Capital reported owning about 3.2 million shares; Jane Street Global Trading reported owning 17.2 million shares; while Jane Street Options, LLC, was reported as the beneficial owner of the bulk of the stake, equivalent to 23.6 million shares. A little over one-third of the stake, 15.5 million shares, were reported as “acquirable through conversion of convertible bonds held.”

Opendoor’s stock has whipsawed in recent days as large shareholders have exited some of their positions. Indeed, just yesterday it came to light that Access Industries, one of Opendoor’s top shareholders, had sold nearly $100 million of OPEN on Tuesday.

Separately, data out yesterday revealed that “sales of newly built homes rose a much larger-than-expected 20.5% in August compared with July,” per CNBC, which might have contributed to positive sentiment on the stock, which gained 16% yesterday.

As of 5 a.m. ET, the stock was the ninth-most-traded in the United States, with heavier volumes (in dollar terms) than tech giants Oracle, Google, and fellow retail favorite Palantir.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

GameStop jumps in after-hours trading after CEO Ryan Cohen purchases another 500,000 shares

Ryan Cohen is putting his money where his mouth is.

The GameStop CEO bought another 500,000 shares of company stock for $10.8 million on Wednesday, per a filing.

The stock was trading higher on Wednesday thanks to Cohen’s purchase of 500,000 shares for roughly $10.6 million on Tuesday, and extended these gains in the after-hours session on this news.

“The Reporting Person believes that it is essential for the Chief Executive Officer of any public company to purchase shares of such company in the open market with his or her own personal funds in order to further strengthen alignment with stockholders,” per the filing. “The Reporting Person believes that any Chief Executive Officer who fails to do so should be fired.”

Cohen is poised to become even more financially enmeshed with GameStop’s stock and operating performance should shareholders approve a package that would tie his pay completely to ambitious targets for the company’s earnings and market cap.

The CEO now owns about 8.56% of shares outstanding.

markets

AppLovin tumbles; company dismisses negative report as “false, misleading, and nonsensical”

AppLovin managed to finish Tuesday well off its lows after initially getting clobbered in the wake of an incendiary report published by CapitalWatch.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling the ad tech firm “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to launder funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling the ad tech firm “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to launder funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

markets

Intel soars amid retail engagement, analyst chatter

Intel ripped toward a new 52-week high Wednesday, amid a flurry of activity in the options market and a couple of positive analyst assessments ahead of its earnings report due tomorrow.

Shortly after 11 a.m. ET, call options activity was roughly equivalent to the full-day average over the past 10 sessions. Bets on stock swings using call options have become a highly popular retail trade, suggesting that retail investors are getting interested in the shares ahead of the report from the partially nationalized American chip icon.

(That interpretation is buttressed by what we’re seeing on social sentiment-monitoring sites like SwaggyStocks, which at about 11:30 a.m. listed Intel as the fifth-most-mentioned stock on Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets forum over the past 24 hours.)

Wall Street analysts are also chattering about the stock, with RBC and Bernstein Research both writing about it in the last 24 hours.

RBC — which has a “sector perform” (or neutral) rating on Intel — said it expects a “slight beat and largely inline outlook” when the company reports after the close Thursday.

Bernstein’s Intel watchers — who have a “market perform” (also neutral) rating on the stock — seemed a bit more cautious, writing, “Overall numbers going forward still looking high to us. Fundamentals and valuation keep us sidelined.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.