Markets
(J. Edward Moreno/Sherwood News)
(J. Edward Moreno/Sherwood News)

Novo and Lilly agree prices are falling — and disagree on what comes next

Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are cutting prices to reach more patients — with sharply different expectations about what that means for sales.

The two drugmakers behind the weight-loss drug boom see the market heading in the same direction — but their own futures diverging sharply.

Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly together sold nearly $70 billion worth of their blockbuster GLP-1 drugs in 2025, up from roughly $41 billion in 2024. As pricing pressure intensifies — from government negotiations, insurers, and rising competition between the two companies — both drugmakers agree on the broad trajectory: prices are falling but the pie is getting bigger. 

Novo, long the category leader with its Ozempic and Wegovy injections, is entering 2026 bracing for a sales decline of up to 13%. “Net-net, it is price declines that drive US down,” Karsten Knudsen, Novo’s chief finance officer, told analysts on Wednesday.

Lilly doesn’t disagree. Lily’s CFO, Lucas Montarce, told analysts that “price is expected to be a drag on growth in the low to mid-teens.”

But while Novo sees sales slowing, Lilly forecast annual revenues to hit between $80 billion and $83 billion, a more than 20% increase and more than analysts were penciling in. Doing some reverse engineering, analysts and Deutsche Bank estimated that implies 42% year-over-year volume growth.

“To us, it looks like LLY and NVO could not be any more different in terms of Diabesity elasticity / portfolio,” the analysts wrote. 

Both companies reported financial results Wednesday morning. Lilly rose 9% by the afternoon on Wednesday. Novo, which gave an early look at its gloomy sales guidance on Tuesday, is down about 20% since Monday’s close.

The next frontier: Pills

Novo is betting that expanding access — especially through lower prices and new formulations — will eventually pay off. Central to that strategy is the newly launched Wegovy pill, the first oral GLP-1 approved for obesity.

Novo said early signs show its Wegovy pill is expanding the GLP-1 market and operating as a primarily cash-pay business. “We are all in on pushing the pill,” Knudsen, Novo’s CFO, said.

As of the week ended January 23, total prescriptions for the Wegovy pill were about 50,000, of which roughly 45,000 came through self-pay channels, the company said. Most of those prescriptions appear to be for patients who had never taken a GLP-1 before. 

Lilly is watching closely. 

Ken Custer, head of Lilly’s cardiometabolic segment, said he sees the early data from his competitor as “encouraging.” Lilly has its own weight-loss pill — orforglipron — coming to market in a few months. 

“Were very encouraged by what were seeing with oral Wegovy as it validates our belief that theres a substantial number of people [who are overweight or obese] who have been sitting on the sidelines waiting for an oral option,” he said. “It looks like these are mostly new starts. That means its expanding the market, and thats good news for Lilly.”

A consumer drug, consumer price pressures 

Weight-loss drugs are increasingly behaving less like traditional prescription medicines and more like consumer products — and that shift is reshaping margins. Both companies have direct-to-consumer pharmacies, often partnering with telehealth companies to distribute their products. 

Knudsen noted the gross margin on the Wegovy pill is below the injectable version, but is still healthy. The cash-pay prices for Novo’s injectables are now lower than Lilly’s. He said lowering prices “is our investment for the future and for capturing more patients.” 

More than 1 million people used Lilly’s direct-to-consumer platform, LillyDirect, in 2025, and self-pay Zepbound vials now account for roughly a third of new obesity drug prescriptions in the US, Lilly CEO Dave Ricks told analysts.

“I am hard-pressed to think of an analog where you have this many people paying out of pocket for a prescription medication,” Ricks said. 

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

United beats Q1 earnings and revenue estimates, lowers full-year profit guidance amid surging jet fuel prices

United Airlines reported its first-quarter earnings results after the bell on Tuesday. The carrier’s shares ticked down in after-hours trading.

For Q1, United reported:

  • Adjusted earnings of $1.19 per share, compared to the Wall Street estimate of $1.08 per share compiled by FactSet.

  • $14.6 billion in revenue, compared to the $14.39 billion consensus estimate.

In the first quarter, United’s fuel expense grew 12.6% from the same period last year to $3.04 billion.

For the second quarter, United expects adjusted earnings per share of between $1 and $2, shy of Wall Street expectations of $2.08. For the full year ahead, United said it expects earnings between $7 and $11 per share, compared to its prior guidance of between $12 and $14 per share.

“Guidance assumes United’s revenue recovers 40% to 50% of the fuel price increases in the second quarter, 70% to 80% of the fuel price increases in the third quarter and 85% to 100% of the fuel price increases in the fourth quarter 2026,” read the company’s investor update.

Earlier this month, United was among the first major US airlines to hike its bag fees amid higher fuel costs. Its shares have fallen more than 15% from a February high days before the war in Iran began.

United has also made waves this month following reports that CEO Scott Kirby had floated the idea of a merger with American Airlines to President Trump. A merger between two of the big four airlines would create a true US behemoth, controlling more than a third of the American market. American Air last week said it wasn’t interested in merging with United and hadn’t held talks on the idea. On Tuesday, Trump told CNBC that he doesn’t like the idea either.

markets

Hedge funds are following retail traders into the Magnificent 7

Hedge funds are following retail traders into the stocks the masses never stopped buying.

“As we kick off earnings for megacap tech stocks, this stood out: [hedge funds] have started buying Mag7 stocks again this month though positioning remains well below the peak levels seen in early 2016,” wrote Goldman Sachs’ Cullen Morgan.

Goldman PB Mag 7
Source: Goldman Sachs

In early April, JPMorgan strategist Arun Jain noted that retail investors had basically been selling everything but the Magnificent 7 stocks as part of a more cautious stance due to the Iran war.

(Apple has been a long-standing exception to this trend, presumably because retail traders arent fond of its hands-off approach to AI.)

JPM Retail flows

Last August, Jain discussed how retail activity tended to “crowd in” institutional buyers in meme stocks, while Goldman’s John Marshall advised clients to piggyback on stocks beloved by retail traders. Speculative, retail-geared assets proceeded to go on a tremendous run that soured in October.

But there are some early indications that a similar bout of speculative fervor is bubbling up once more.

markets

POET Technologies surges above $10 for first time in 4 years amid explosion in call volumes

POET Technologies is up nearly 40% this week as options market activity goes haywire in a faint echo of what got the stock on retail traders’ radars in October.

As of 11:12 a.m. ET, more than 10 calls have changed hands for every put traded. This bullish impulse has propelled the stock above the $10 threshold for the first time since March 2022.

Shares of the optical communications firm briefly dipped last week after Wolfpack Research said it was short the company because its investors would be exposed to an “IRS tax nightmare.”

The company responded that day saying it was taking measures for US shareholders that “should mitigate certain potential adverse US federal income tax consequences to it that could otherwise result from the Company’s status as a passive foreign investment company.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.