Markets
Oracle Credit Default Swaps
(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Markets are getting more concerned about Oracle’s AI data center debt

The price of insuring against Oracle defaulting on its growing debt load has spike massively since September.

After a respite Monday, AI bears are back in control Tuesday.

Bellwethers like Advanced Micro Devices and Nvidia are getting battered on reports of a brewing collaboration between Alphabet and Meta on chips. And that partnership’s potential threat to OpenAI and some of those who’ve inked deals with the AI startup giant — as investors, customers, suppliers, and sometimes all three! — is causing some jitters out there.

Meanwhile, concerns about all that borrowing that companies have planned or done to finance the giant AI data center build-out boom that’s currently underway continue burbling away in the bond markets. As we’ve mentioned, the price of insuring against a debt default by Oracle has become a closely watched expression of worries about the AI boom.

While some of those concerns seemed to relent earlier today, resulting in a slight reduction in prices for this bond insurance — known as credit default swaps — on Oracle debt, it’s worth pointing out that the concerns also seem to have spread a bit even to companies that have far sturdier financials than Oracle.

And despite today’s dip, the cost to protect against an Oracle default has surged massively in recent weeks.

For instance, according to FactSet data, Microsoft and Meta have also seen prices of insuring against their own default creep higher recently, along with Amazon.

To be clear, the price for insuring Oracle debt is a lot higher than for these other hyperscalers — likely a reflection of the massive amounts of cash the market expects Oracle to burn for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, it shouldn’t be surprising to see markets reflect rising risks for even blue chips like Microsoft as they take on more debt and commit to years of large capital expenditures for a still developing, new technology.

That stunning acceleration in Wall Street’s estimates for Oracle’s cash burn is likely driving the rapid rise in the cost of Oracle CDS. Investors went from thinking that Oracle would generate $25 billion in free cash flow in 2028 to expecting the company to burn $25 billion 2028.

While recently, increased investments in anything AI-related have seemed to push stocks up, that this historical reversal has led not just to more expensive CDS but a slumping share price signals a rise in maybe not skepticism, but at least realism in the market when it comes to the AI boom.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Southwest reports lower-than-expected Q1 earnings and revenue, declines to offer full-year profit update

Southwest Airlines reported its first-quarter earnings after the bell on Wednesday. Its shares fell more than 6% in after-hours trading.

For the first quarter, Southwest reported:

  • Adjusted earnings of $0.45 per share, compared to the $0.47 per share expected by Wall Street analysts polled by Factset.

  • Revenue of $7.25 billion, compared to estimates of $7.27 billion.

The carrier guided for adjusted earnings of between $0.35 and $0.65 per share for its second quarter, a range whose midpoint is below analyst estimates of $0.53 per share. Regarding its full-year 2026 earnings estimate of “at least” $4 per share, Southwest declined to give an update “given the ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty.”

“Achieving this outcome would require lower fuel prices and/or stronger revenue performance to offset higher fuel expense,” Southwest said.

Southwest introduced bag fees last year, ending a more than five-decade-long “bags fly free” policy. Earlier this month, less than a year after the change, it joined its major US rivals in hiking its bag fees by $10 amid surging jet fuel prices.

Southwest, which discontinued its fuel-hedging program last year, said it spent $1.36 billion on fuel and related taxes in the first quarter, up 8.6% year over year.

markets

ServiceNow dives after reporting sequential decline in profit margins

Cloud software giant ServiceNow — which has been something of a poster child for the AI-related software sell-off — saw its shares fall sharply after delivering Q1 results that included a quarter-on-quarter decline in profit margins.

The company reported:

  • Revenue of $3.77 billion, higher than the $3.75 billion analyst consensus estimate published by FactSet.

  • Diluted adjusted earnings of $0.97 per share, on point with the $0.97 analysts had expected.

  • Subscription revenue of $3.67 billion vs. the $3.65 billion predicted.

  • Non-GAAP gross margins of 79.5%, down from 80.5% in Q4.

ServiceNow issued guidance for Q2 subscription revenues of between $3.815 billion and $3.820 billion, compared to the $3.75 billion FactSet consensus estimate.

ServiceNow shares have been at the epicenter of the software sell-off driven by the fear that such companies are at risk of being rendered obsolete by AI. The stock was down 33% for the year through the end of the New York trading session on Wednesday.

markets

IBM falls despite posting better-than-expected Q1 results

Big Blue fell in after-hours trading despite reporting better-than-expected Q1 results, as it didn’t include in the release an internal metric it typically discloses to track the progress of its AI business. IBM reported: 

  • Q1 revenue of $15.92 billion vs. the $15.63 billion FactSet consensus estimate.

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $1.91 vs. the $1.81 consensus expectation.

  • Sales of $7.05 billion at its key, high-margin software segment vs. a $6.98 billion consensus of nine analyst estimates.

  • Sales of $3.33 billion in its infrastructure unit, which houses its growing AI mainframe business, vs. a $3.13 billion consensus estimate.

Unlike recent earnings statements, the company made no mention of an internal metric it used to track its progress in AI, which it called its “generative AI book of business.” That metric stood at $12.5 billion at the end of 2025, per the company.

The infrastructure business is of acute interest to the market, after AI giant Anthropic announced in February that Claude Code could efficiently modernize code bases in the COBOL programming language, which serves as a cornerstone of IBM’s enterprise mainframe business. The language is still widely used in certain industries, such as airlines and finance. (ATMs, for instance, run almost entirely on COBOL.) 

Anthropic’s COBOL announcement cut the legs out from under IBM. The stock plunged 13% on February 23, the day of the announcement — its worst daily drop in more than 25 years. And it was down roughly 15% for the year through the end of trading Wednesday.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.