Markets
Jamie Dimon smiling, October 2025
Jamie Dimon (Luis Robayo/Getty Images)

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon on the bank’s plans to boost spending by $9 billion in 2026: “Trust me”

When it comes to AI spending, “we are going to stay up front, so help us God,” Dimon said.

Luke Kawa

JPMorgan is spending more, and investors are just going to have to trust that Jamie Dimon’s putting the money to good use.

During JPMorgan’s Q4 earnings call on Tuesday, CFO Jeremy Barnum referenced the bank’s expense guidance, which confirmed its outlook for costs to rise by $9 billion (to $105 billion) in 2026.

Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo asked management for more color on the expense guidance, and in particular for granular details on AI-linked costs, as well as any early returns the bank has realized from such investments.

However, CEO and Chairman Jamie Dimon was not into the idea of providing a line-by-line detailed audit of his spending and resultant outcomes. His reply included (emphasis added):

“Mike, we owe you all, as shareholders, as much information we can give you, but were not going to give you information which I think puts us at a competitive disadvantage.”

“The good news is when we look at the world, we see huge opportunity. Were opening rural branches, which we think will be good. Were opening more branches in foreign countries. Were building better payment systems. Were adding better personalization in consumer banking, credit card, where were adding AI across the company. And those are all opportunities. And I understand your issue or concern about the $9 billion, but I think you should be saying, if you really believe theyre real, you should be doing that. Thats the right way to grow a company. And you look at the complexity of the world, the amount of capital requirements, the SRI initiative — I think that SRI initiative may be far bigger than we thought, and thats in there.

Youll be justified by the results, but were not going to be giving detail on every single thing every single quarter. And youre going to have to, just as partners, trust me, Im sorry.”

[Note: the “SRI Initiative” pertains to the bank’s October announcement of a 10-year, $1.5 trillion Security and Resiliency Initiative that will boost activity in industries deemed to be essential to national economic security and resiliency, like rare earths, battery storage, and shipbuilding]

When Mayo followed up asking for more specific details on AI, Dimon said:

“Were building more AI systems. Were building more — were connecting more branches, which means you have the higher network expenses. Were doing all the things you want us to do. But the tech spend is always one of the harder ones to measure and evaluate. Thats been true my whole life.

You could imagine, were pretty detailed at what were doing, why were doing it. Are we delivering it on time? But there isnt an area where you — if you dug into it that you wouldnt say, yeah, you want to be — you better be the best in the world in tech. But we spend money on trading. We spend money on payments. We spend money on consumer. We spend money at asset management. We spend money in corporate. We spend money — we need to have the best tech in the world that drives investment, it drives margin, it drives competition.”

“We look at all of our competitors, but those competitors include all the fintech. You have Stripe, SoFi, you have Revolut, you have your Schwab. You have everyone out there, and these are good players, and we analyze what they do and how they do it, and how we stay up front. And we are going to stay up front, so help us God. Were not going to try to meet some expense target, and then 10 years from now, youll be asking us the question, how did JPMorgan get left behind?”

One wonders if Dimon’s somewhat defensive tone implies he didn’t have dozens of ready-made examples about AI-driven efficiencies at the bank that he could easily point to.

Banks have always wanted to be more like tech companies. But prior to the past few years, tech companies have been known for massive profitability and a relatively asset-light model, not as leaders of generationally large capital expenditure binges.

Shares of America’s biggest bank fell more than 4% on Tuesday following the release of earnings.

“Management was unapologetic on investing in areas like new branches, AI, and its Security and Resiliency Initiative,” wrote Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Herman Chan, Alison Williams, and Ravi Chelluri. “Shares have drifted lower during the trading session, which may reflect comments on 2026 operating leverage and lingering risk from a potential cap on credit-card rates.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

POET Technologies nears multiyear high on strong call demand after flagship product wins award

POET Technologies is surging on heavy volumes and high call demand after announcing that it won a Product Innovation Award at China’s Infostone awards.

The honor went to the optical communications company’s flagship product, the Teralight, which uses light to move data between chips.

“Unveiled less than a year ago at the 2025 OFC Conference, POET Teralight has driven commercial interest in the Company because of its highly integrated design and complete optical system-on-chip architecture that simplifies module development,” per the press release.

This award may be the latest excuse to buy the stock, which is up over 40% year to date.

Call activity is elevated, with nearly 37,000 having changed hands as of 10:55 a.m. ET, well above the 20-day average of 28,030 for a full session. Shares are approaching their multi-year high of $9.41.

markets

Intel bucks market slump after Wall Street upgrades

While the market slid early Tuesday, Intel soared as the American chipmaker received a pair of upgrades:

  • HSBC analysts lifted their rating on the stock to “hold” — essentially “neutral” — from “reduce,” Wall Street-speak for “sell.” The analysts nearly doubled their price target for the shares to $50 from $26. (That’s essentially where the stock is currently trading.)

  • Seaport Global also boosted its rating to “buy” from “neutral,” with a $65 price target.

Improving demand for CPUs — Intel’s bread-and-butter processors — is behind HSBC’s newfound enthusiasm for the shares. Analysts at the bank wrote:

“We had been cautious on Intel mainly given overall uncertainty on customer pipeline and execution headwinds in their foundry business while the core business was also lacking visibility on growth drivers. However, we now turn more positive as we expect the traditional servers (DCAI) to get back on a growth trajectory. We expect there is an overwhelmingly increasing demand for server CPUs driven by rising agentic AI... While the stock has moved up 19% YTD (vs S&P 500 up 1%), we believe there is further [data center and AI group] upside still not fully priced in. Hence, we upgrade Intel from Reduce to Hold.”

HSBC seems to be slightly understating the extent of the gains for the stock so far in 2026, as its share price has risen nearly 30% since the end of last year. But the gains are even more impressive if you date them to the partial nationalization of the ailing American chip giant, which was announced on August 22. Almost a month later, Nvidia announced a strategic partnership with the company, giving it a massive shot in the arm. Since then the stock is up more than 90%.

markets

ImmunityBio surge continues on sign its drug may be approved to treat a broader range of bladder cancers

Once you start squeezing, you can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.

Shares of ImmnuityBio are flying higher once again, up more than 30% in early trading Tuesday after having been down as much as 10% in the premarket. A little more than half an hour into the regular trading day, more than 46 million shares have changed hands, more than 3x the 20-day average for this point in the session.

Last week, we discussed how a number of positive press releases from the company touting the progress of its treatments helped send shares skyward, making the heavily shorted company a hot topic of discussion on the r/ShortSqueeze subreddit.

The positive press parade continues this morning, with ImmunityBio announcing that the FDA asked for more information about the ability of its ANKTIVA drug to treat a certain type of bladder cancer, though it doesn’t need to do any new clinical trials. Management said they would provide this information within 30 days.

Share are up nearly 200% over the past six sessions.

On Monday, the company published a podcast appearance by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, founder, executive chairman, and global chief medical and technology officer, on “The Sean Spicer Show,” which was provocatively titled, “Is the FDA BLOCKING Life Saving Cancer Treatments?”

markets

AppLovin craters after report from CapitalWatch alleges it’s a money-laundering operation for “transnational criminal kingpins”

AppLovin is tumbling in premarket trading on Tuesday after financial research agency CapitalWatch published a report on Monday calling the company “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

“AppLovin serves as the ultimate exit for asset laundering/diversion by transnational criminal kingpins,” the authors wrote, alleging that the growth of its advertising business comes in part from illicit cryptocurrency funds routed through its platform.

AppLovin did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Sherwood News.

This is far from the first report to question AppLovin’s business practices.

Fuzzy Panda Research and Culper Research announced short positions in the ad tech firm last February in research reports alleging that AppLovin’s operating performance was a function of “systematic exploitation of app permissions” as well as taking data and gaming the ad platforms of other tech giants, particularly Meta. In October, reports surfaced that the SEC was investigating AppLovin’s data collection practices, as were a number of state regulators.

The allegations raised by CapitalWatch are a whole different kettle of illegal fish.

Anything is possible. But if I were hypothetically trying to launder a bunch of money, I likely would not try to do so through a publicly traded entity domiciled in the United States that’s subject to much more regulatory oversight and scrutiny than the average global firm.

markets

Ives: Greenland tariff talk pushing markets into the red is “an opportunity to own the tech winners for 2026 and beyond”

When markets are reacting to negative news, sometimes traders just sell the things that have gone up the most — whether or not this new catalyst disproportionately hurts those companies or not.

That’s something we saw in the run-up to last year’s tariff announcements, and Wedbush Securities’ global head of tech research, Dan Ives, reckons we’re in for more of the same as US President Donald Trump threatens escalating tariffs on a host of European countries unless they agree to let America purchase Greenland.

“Being here at Davos this week on the ground... the tariff scuffle is clearly an overhang on the conference as Trump gets here tomorrow to speak to tech leaders and various world leaders,” Ives wrote. “Our view is just like over the last year the bark will be worse than the bite on this issue and tariff threats as negotiations take place and tensions ultimately calm down between Trump and EU leaders.”

Every member of the Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF, a fund that holds the analyst’s favorite AI stocks, is trading to the downside as of 7:35 a.m. ET. Ives highlighted Nvidia, Microsoft, Palantir, CrowdStrike, Nebius, Palo Alto Networks, Google, and Tesla as names to buy on weakness.

“Tech stocks will be hit as the ‘risk off dynamic’ hits AI names front and center but ultimately we view this as an opportunity to own the tech winners for 2026 and beyond,” he concluded.

Buying the dip in general (and buying the dip in megacap AI stocks in particular) were massive contributors to retail traders’ success in 2025.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.