Markets
Wegovy on Hims
A screenshot of Hims & Hers’ website (Sherwood News)

Hims & Hers on track for biggest drop ever after Novo Nordisk ends partnership

Novo said Hims is participating in “illegal mass compounding and deceptive marketing.” The falling out could be a precursor for more legal action.

J. Edward Moreno
6/23/25 6:57AM

Hims & Hers stock plunged, on track for its biggest single-day drop ever, after Novo Nordisk said it was ending its relatively new partnership with the telehealth company, citing concerns about what it called Hims’ “illegal mass compounding and deceptive marketing.”

Shares were recently down 27%.

The move is a sharp reversal from less than two months ago, when the companies announced a partnership on April 29 that allowed Novo’s blockbuster weight-loss drug, Wegovy, to be sold on the Hims & Hers platform. The drugmaker also announced partnerships with two other telehealth companies, Ro and LifeMD, on the same day.

The partnership between parties that had been adversaries when it comes to GLP-1s reflected the drugmaker’s desire to tap into uninsured consumers and the telehealth company’s desire to get name-brand products in its portfolio. When the pact was announced, Hims’ stock jumped 23% in a day.

Novo Nordisk calling Hims’ compounding practices “illegal” is notable considering it has sued dozens of wellness clinics for selling compounded semaglutide. Lawsuits from giant drugmakers are a growing risk for telehealth companies — Eli Lilly has recently sued telehealth providers that continued to sell copies of weight-loss drug Zepbound after the shortage of that drug ended.

Wegovy is still shown as available on its website.

In a Monday afternoon post on X, Hims CEO Andrew Dudum said Novo pressured the company to steer customers away from compounded drugs.

"We refuse to be strong-armed by any pharmaceutical company’s anticompetitive demands that infringe on the independent decision making of providers and limit patient choice," he said.

Hims and its peers had been selling copycat versions of Novo’s weight-loss drugs for about a year while they were allowed to by the government during a shortage. But once that shortage ended in February, their ability to continue selling exact copies became limited.

Novo said it saw the partnership as a way to help Hims patients transition from compounded medications to its branded product. But Hims and others continued to offer compounded versions of Wegovy, marketing them as “personalized.”

Compounded versions of Wegovy can still be sold if a patient requires a modification, such as to remove a nonactive ingredient that they’re allergic to, or if they need a dose that the drugmaker doesn’t manufacture. But Novo is accusing Hims of “mass compounding,” suggesting that its compounded products aren’t made for specific patients. Compounded drugs offer telehealth companies higher margins than branded or generic.

When the partnership was announced in April, a Novo executive said the drugmaker and Hims were “developing a road map that combines Novo Nordisk’s innovative medications with Hims & Hers’ ability to deliver access to quality care at scale.” That aligns with Hims’ broader expansion vision. Novo did not respond to multiple requests for clarification on the nature of that collaboration.

Earlier this month, Lucas Montarce, Eli Lilly’s chief financial officer, said a provision in the company’s partnerships with telehealth providers is that they don’t compound either tirzepatide or semaglutide, the scientific names for Zepbound (Lilly’s weight-loss shot) and Wegovy. That confused industry onlookers because at least two of its partners appear to continue selling compounded versions.

Notably, Novo called off the partnership with Hims less than a week after it scored a legal win solidifying the Food and Drug Administration’s removal of semaglutide from its shortage list. The removal was challenged by a compounding pharmacy trade group that said the FDA ignored signs the drug was still in short supply. 

On June 17, the judge sided with the drugmaker, cementing the end of the shortage and Novo’s sole ability to mass produce semaglutide. (The trade group, Outsourcing Facilities Association, filed an appeal.)

Luke Kawa contributed to this article.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

“Pokemon” trading cards skyrocketing in value and GameStop’s collectibles business taking off are two sides of the same coin


The Wall Street Journal’s fantastic piece “The Hot Investment With a 3,000% Return? Pokémon Cards” includes this vignette:

“...the cards caught fire among amateur investors during the pandemic. As some investors banded together to spark the GameStop meme stock mania, a more fringe group of traders, also stuck at home and armed with cash from government stimulus, began scooping up Pokémon cards.”

And the connection between “Pokemon” cards and the video game retailer is in fact even closer than that:

GameStop’s collectibles business played a big role in why it smashed Q2 revenue expectations! Sales in this segment exceeded $227 million, while the two analysts that provided forecasts had an average estimate of $170.4 million. Fiscal year to date, sales of collectibles make up 25.8% of its revenues, up from 16.4% at this time last year.

The company significantly expanded its footprint in the “Pokemon” trading card world in 2024 by launching in-store buying and selling of individual cards, and introduced Power Packs,” which include one card graded at 8 or above by the Professional Sports Authenticator, in its most recent quarter.

As a 35-year-old man who still plays Pokemon (Nuzlockes are peak math + strategy entertainment!), thinks the release of Pokemon Go marked the peak for Western civilization, and considers Christmas 1998 to be the second-best day of his life because it’s when he got Pokemon Red, I personally view the outperformance of Pokemon cards as being indicative of the power of nostalgia coupled with a drop-off in child rearing by millennials, leaving more room for discretionary purchases and investments.

And the nostalgia business seems like a great place to be.

“...the cards caught fire among amateur investors during the pandemic. As some investors banded together to spark the GameStop meme stock mania, a more fringe group of traders, also stuck at home and armed with cash from government stimulus, began scooping up Pokémon cards.”

And the connection between “Pokemon” cards and the video game retailer is in fact even closer than that:

GameStop’s collectibles business played a big role in why it smashed Q2 revenue expectations! Sales in this segment exceeded $227 million, while the two analysts that provided forecasts had an average estimate of $170.4 million. Fiscal year to date, sales of collectibles make up 25.8% of its revenues, up from 16.4% at this time last year.

The company significantly expanded its footprint in the “Pokemon” trading card world in 2024 by launching in-store buying and selling of individual cards, and introduced Power Packs,” which include one card graded at 8 or above by the Professional Sports Authenticator, in its most recent quarter.

As a 35-year-old man who still plays Pokemon (Nuzlockes are peak math + strategy entertainment!), thinks the release of Pokemon Go marked the peak for Western civilization, and considers Christmas 1998 to be the second-best day of his life because it’s when he got Pokemon Red, I personally view the outperformance of Pokemon cards as being indicative of the power of nostalgia coupled with a drop-off in child rearing by millennials, leaving more room for discretionary purchases and investments.

And the nostalgia business seems like a great place to be.

markets

Oracle’s hyperscaler competitors lag after the cloud computing giant’s blowout revenue forecast

Oracle’s forecast for mind-blowing revenue growth through its fiscal 2030 is lifting most AI-adjacent stocks today.

However, the ones being left behind in this rising tide, falling or lagging well behind Morgan Stanley’s basket of AI tech beneficiaries (up 5.8% as of 12:22 p.m. ET), are its fellow hyperscalers.

Microsoft and Alphabet, which also have massive cloud divisions, are positive — but only just. Amazon, whose cloud revenue growth was deemed a disappointment relative to peers this quarter, is down 2.8%. Meta is down 1.2%.

This suggests, at the very least, that traders aren’t mapping Oracle’s outlook for Nvidia-like revenue growth onto the other major cloud players or one of their biggest customers.

markets

Chewy sinks despite topping Q2 estimates, erasing much of its recent rally

Chewy dropped nearly 16% Wednesday, despite the online pet retailer fetching stronger-than-expected Q2 results and hiking its sales guidance for the year.

The move erased much of a recent blistering run-up for the stock, which had gained 23% off its recent August 5 low through Tuesday.

The company delivered adjusted earnings per share of $0.33 for the quarter, in line with analysts’ consensus forecast of $0.33. Sales jumped nearly 8.6% to $3.1 billion, also above forecasts, with sales to the company’s Autoship customers making up 83% of the total. 

Looking ahead: Chewy boosted its full-year sales estimates to $12.5 billion to $12.6 billion, up from $12.3 billion to $12.45 billion. Wall Street was expecting sales of $12.49 billion for the year.

For the current quarter, Chewy guided adjusted EPS to $0.28 to $0.33, compared with the Street’s $0.30 estimate.

Chewy ended the quarter with nearly 21 million active customers, up 4.5% from last year. CEO Sumit Singh said the quarter showed “Chewy’s differentiated value proposition,” citing both customer growth and wallet share gains.

Still, headline net income fell to $62 million, with net margins slipping under cost pressures tied to share-based compensation. 

Chewy shares were up 24% year to date going into the print.

Whitney Houston

Oracle just had its best day in the stock market since 1992

Oracle shareholders are singing “I Will Always Love You” to the stock.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.