Markets
Wegovy on Hims
A screenshot of Hims & Hers’ website (Sherwood News)

Hims & Hers on track for biggest drop ever after Novo Nordisk ends partnership

Novo said Hims is participating in “illegal mass compounding and deceptive marketing.” The falling out could be a precursor for more legal action.

J. Edward Moreno

Hims & Hers stock plunged, on track for its biggest single-day drop ever, after Novo Nordisk said it was ending its relatively new partnership with the telehealth company, citing concerns about what it called Hims’ “illegal mass compounding and deceptive marketing.”

Shares were recently down 27%.

The move is a sharp reversal from less than two months ago, when the companies announced a partnership on April 29 that allowed Novo’s blockbuster weight-loss drug, Wegovy, to be sold on the Hims & Hers platform. The drugmaker also announced partnerships with two other telehealth companies, Ro and LifeMD, on the same day.

The partnership between parties that had been adversaries when it comes to GLP-1s reflected the drugmaker’s desire to tap into uninsured consumers and the telehealth company’s desire to get name-brand products in its portfolio. When the pact was announced, Hims’ stock jumped 23% in a day.

Novo Nordisk calling Hims’ compounding practices “illegal” is notable considering it has sued dozens of wellness clinics for selling compounded semaglutide. Lawsuits from giant drugmakers are a growing risk for telehealth companies — Eli Lilly has recently sued telehealth providers that continued to sell copies of weight-loss drug Zepbound after the shortage of that drug ended.

Wegovy is still shown as available on its website.

In a Monday afternoon post on X, Hims CEO Andrew Dudum said Novo pressured the company to steer customers away from compounded drugs.

"We refuse to be strong-armed by any pharmaceutical company’s anticompetitive demands that infringe on the independent decision making of providers and limit patient choice," he said.

Hims and its peers had been selling copycat versions of Novo’s weight-loss drugs for about a year while they were allowed to by the government during a shortage. But once that shortage ended in February, their ability to continue selling exact copies became limited.

Novo said it saw the partnership as a way to help Hims patients transition from compounded medications to its branded product. But Hims and others continued to offer compounded versions of Wegovy, marketing them as “personalized.”

Compounded versions of Wegovy can still be sold if a patient requires a modification, such as to remove a nonactive ingredient that they’re allergic to, or if they need a dose that the drugmaker doesn’t manufacture. But Novo is accusing Hims of “mass compounding,” suggesting that its compounded products aren’t made for specific patients. Compounded drugs offer telehealth companies higher margins than branded or generic.

When the partnership was announced in April, a Novo executive said the drugmaker and Hims were “developing a road map that combines Novo Nordisk’s innovative medications with Hims & Hers’ ability to deliver access to quality care at scale.” That aligns with Hims’ broader expansion vision. Novo did not respond to multiple requests for clarification on the nature of that collaboration.

Earlier this month, Lucas Montarce, Eli Lilly’s chief financial officer, said a provision in the company’s partnerships with telehealth providers is that they don’t compound either tirzepatide or semaglutide, the scientific names for Zepbound (Lilly’s weight-loss shot) and Wegovy. That confused industry onlookers because at least two of its partners appear to continue selling compounded versions.

Notably, Novo called off the partnership with Hims less than a week after it scored a legal win solidifying the Food and Drug Administration’s removal of semaglutide from its shortage list. The removal was challenged by a compounding pharmacy trade group that said the FDA ignored signs the drug was still in short supply. 

On June 17, the judge sided with the drugmaker, cementing the end of the shortage and Novo’s sole ability to mass produce semaglutide. (The trade group, Outsourcing Facilities Association, filed an appeal.)

Luke Kawa contributed to this article.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

GameStop jumps in after-hours trading after CEO Ryan Cohen purchases another 500,000 shares

Ryan Cohen is putting his money where his mouth is.

The GameStop CEO bought another 500,000 shares of company stock for $10.8 million on Wednesday, per a filing.

The stock was trading higher on Wednesday thanks to Cohen’s purchase of 500,000 shares for roughly $10.6 million on Tuesday, and extended these gains in the after-hours session on this news.

“The Reporting Person believes that it is essential for the Chief Executive Officer of any public company to purchase shares of such company in the open market with his or her own personal funds in order to further strengthen alignment with stockholders,” per the filing. “The Reporting Person believes that any Chief Executive Officer who fails to do so should be fired.”

Cohen is poised to become even more financially enmeshed with GameStop’s stock and operating performance should shareholders approve a package that would tie his pay completely to ambitious targets for the company’s earnings and market cap.

The CEO now owns about 8.56% of shares outstanding.

markets

AppLovin tumbles; company dismisses negative report as “false, misleading, and nonsensical”

AppLovin managed to finish Tuesday well off its lows after initially getting clobbered in the wake of an incendiary report published by CapitalWatch.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling the ad tech firm “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to launder funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling the ad tech firm “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to launder funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

markets

Intel soars amid retail engagement, analyst chatter

Intel ripped toward a new 52-week high Wednesday, amid a flurry of activity in the options market and a couple of positive analyst assessments ahead of its earnings report due tomorrow.

Shortly after 11 a.m. ET, call options activity was roughly equivalent to the full-day average over the past 10 sessions. Bets on stock swings using call options have become a highly popular retail trade, suggesting that retail investors are getting interested in the shares ahead of the report from the partially nationalized American chip icon.

(That interpretation is buttressed by what we’re seeing on social sentiment-monitoring sites like SwaggyStocks, which at about 11:30 a.m. listed Intel as the fifth-most-mentioned stock on Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets forum over the past 24 hours.)

Wall Street analysts are also chattering about the stock, with RBC and Bernstein Research both writing about it in the last 24 hours.

RBC — which has a “sector perform” (or neutral) rating on Intel — said it expects a “slight beat and largely inline outlook” when the company reports after the close Thursday.

Bernstein’s Intel watchers — who have a “market perform” (also neutral) rating on the stock — seemed a bit more cautious, writing, “Overall numbers going forward still looking high to us. Fundamentals and valuation keep us sidelined.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.