Markets
Parakeet among pigeons on cobblestone sidewalk
Getty Images
CORR ISSUES

Apple’s stock is behaving differently from the rest of BATMMAAN because its AI strategy is nowhere

Apple is so bad at AI that its stock is increasingly detached from the rest of Big Tech. Some days that’s a blessing; on others, it’s a curse.

David Crowther

Hey Siri: why is Apple’s stock behaving differently from the rest of Big Tech? Siri, of course, will have absolutely no clue — because Apple’s AI strategy is borderline nonexistent.

Even at the start of this year, people were asking the question, “Why is Apple so bad at AI?” Since then, as Google’s AI efforts have gone from strength to strength, ChatGPT has grown its weekly users to nearly 900 million, and Nvidia briefly crossed a $5 trillion market cap on blowout demand for its Blackwell and Hopper chips, Apple has released some underwhelming updates to its flagship Apple Intelligence product.

And its lack of AI progress is increasingly affecting how the stock is trading, as Apple becomes a sort of “anti-AI” vehicle for investors. Indeed, its correlation with the rest of the BATMMAAN group has dropped precipitously: when ChatGPT was released at the end of November 2022, Apple’s average pairwise correlation* to its Big Tech peers was 0.71 — recently it has dropped to as low as 0.2.

Apple stock correlation to rest of big tech (BATMMAAN)
Sherwood News

This is a pretty remarkable drop-off — and it’s been most pronounced in the stocks that are closest to the AI trade (notably Nvidia, Microsoft, and Broadcom). Apple and Microsoft used to trade nearly in tandem, with a correlation coefficient between the two north of 0.8. That has all but collapsed, with the last 90 trading sessions barely showing a positive correlation.

[The chart above is an average of the seven individual Apple-peer correlations below.]

Of course, this detachment isn’t necessarily a bad thing. On days when the AI trade sputters — such as November 13, when tech stocks got slammed, with Nvidia and Broadcom dropping ~4% and Tesla shedding 6.6% — Apple provided some refuge for tech investors, dropping just 0.2%.

Apple is weirder than Tesla

Perhaps what’s most remarkable from mining the correlation stats is that Apple’s average correlation with the rest of its peer group is now the lowest of any BATMMAAN stock. People used to say that Tesla was the odd one out of the Big Tech giants — but the trading data suggests, fairly strongly, it’s Apple right now.

BATMMAAN Correlation Matrix
Sherwood News, 90-day correlation matrix

Last week, Apple retired its AI chief, potentially suggesting a renewed focus on the nascent technology under new leadership.

*Pearson correlations based on daily returns over 90-day rolling periods.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

GameStop jumps in after-hours trading after CEO Ryan Cohen purchases another 500,000 shares

Ryan Cohen is putting his money where his mouth is.

The GameStop CEO bought another 500,000 shares of company stock for $10.8 million on Wednesday, per a filing.

The stock was trading higher on Wednesday thanks to Cohen’s purchase of 500,000 shares for roughly $10.6 million on Tuesday, and extended these gains in the after-hours session on this news.

“The Reporting Person believes that it is essential for the Chief Executive Officer of any public company to purchase shares of such company in the open market with his or her own personal funds in order to further strengthen alignment with stockholders,” per the filing. “The Reporting Person believes that any Chief Executive Officer who fails to do so should be fired.”

Cohen is poised to become even more financially enmeshed with GameStop’s stock and operating performance should shareholders approve a package that would tie his pay completely to ambitious targets for the company’s earnings and market cap.

The CEO now owns about 8.56% of shares outstanding.

markets

AppLovin tumbles; company dismisses negative report as “false, misleading, and nonsensical”

AppLovin managed to finish well off the lows on Tuesday after initially getting clobbered in the wake of an incendiary report on the adtech firm published by CapitalWatch.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling it “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to “launder” funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

Nonetheless, shares are getting torched on Wednesday, ending down nearly 6%. An AppLovin spokesperson forcefully denied the allegations made by CapitalWatch, which included calling it “the ultimate monument to 21st-century new-type transnational financial crime.”

Per an emailed statement:

We categorically reject the claims made in this report, which is rife with false, misleading, and nonsensical allegations. AppLovin’s public filings transparently disclose our material investments, global operations, and information regarding significant shareholders.

Claims that AppLovin facilitated money laundering or its products are used for unauthorized downloads are patently false. AppLovin functions within a broader ecosystem that includes major app stores, operating systems, and payment providers, and the apps monetized through our platform must be publicly available on the major app stores and subject to their independent review and enforcement. Economically, the money laundering theory is implausible: publishers receive only a portion of advertiser spend, meaning any attempt to “launder” funds would require forfeiting a substantial share while creating a highly visible, auditable transaction trail across multiple independent companies. Accepting the report’s premise would therefore imply a systemic failure across the broader mobile advertising and app-store ecosystem, for which the report provides no evidence.

markets

Intel soars amid retail engagement, analyst chatter

Intel ripped toward a new 52-week high Wednesday, amid a flurry of activity in the options market and a couple of positive analyst assessments ahead of its earnings report due tomorrow.

Shortly after 11 a.m. ET, call options activity was roughly equivalent to the full-day average over the past 10 sessions. Bets on stock swings using call options have become a highly popular retail trade, suggesting that retail investors are getting interested in the shares ahead of the report from the partially nationalized American chip icon.

(That interpretation is buttressed by what we’re seeing on social sentiment-monitoring sites like SwaggyStocks, which at about 11:30 a.m. listed Intel as the fifth-most-mentioned stock on Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets forum over the past 24 hours.)

Wall Street analysts are also chattering about the stock, with RBC and Bernstein Research both writing about it in the last 24 hours.

RBC — which has a “sector perform” (or neutral) rating on Intel — said it expects a “slight beat and largely inline outlook” when the company reports after the close Thursday.

Bernstein’s Intel watchers — who have a “market perform” (also neutral) rating on the stock — seemed a bit more cautious, writing, “Overall numbers going forward still looking high to us. Fundamentals and valuation keep us sidelined.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.