Markets
US permian basis oil production
(Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Analyst: US oil producers might start cutting production

US benchmark oil prices are hovering around key breakeven prices for producers.

Matt Phillips

Analysts at energy consulting firm Rystad Energy say the recent plunge in US oil prices — benchmark West Texas Intermediate has dropped about 15% to roughly $60 a barrel over the last three sessions — could prompt oil producers in the oil- and gas-rich Permian Basin of West Texas to cut production. The analysts write:

“Already modest growth could be at risk if prices remain near $60 per barrel. Rystad estimates that the new ‘all-in’ breakeven cost for many US oil players is now above $62, which includes higher hurdle rates, dividend payments and debt service costs. With Lower-48 production growth already unlikely outside the Permian, a downshift in the country’s most prolific oil basin would decelerate the rate of production growth in 2025, should prices remain subdued.

The business model embraced by US oil producers over the past several years becomes far more difficult to maintain with prices below this level. This means that some combination of near-term activity levels, investor payouts or inventory preservation will need to be sacrificed in order to defend margins. While different companies have different sensitivity to the above factors, activity and production will be threatened the most.”

While sharp sell-offs in trade-exposed parts of the market, such as technology stocks like Apple and retail-related stocks like Nike and Target, have received a lot of attention since the Rose Garden rout began, it’s actually energy stocks that have been the worst performing of the S&P 500’s 11 “sector” breakdowns.

In fact, the single worst-performing S&P 500 stock of the last few days has been APA Corporation, a Texas-based shale driller active in the Permian Basin. It’s down nearly 30% since the April 2 announcement.

The industry’s woes would be a somewhat surprising result for the oil and gas companies and executives that were heavy donors to the Trump reelection campaign. The president ran, in part, on a promise of boosting US production and ensure “energy dominance” of the American industry. On the other hand, he also promised to deeply cut the energy costs American consumers pay, and the recessionary pricing of oil means he’s made some progress there.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.