Crypto
Consensus 2019
CEO of TRON Justin Sun (Steven Ferdman/Getty Images)

Expensive banana purchaser and crypto founder Justin Sun just tripled the amount invested in Trump’s cryptocurrency

Thanks to Sun’s investment, World Liberty Financial hit its (revised) $30 million target, passing a threshold for Trump to be eligible for payouts.

Here’s a fun one: Justin Sun — the TRON cryptocurrency founder who was sued by the SEC in March 2023 under allegations of a market-manipulation scheme involving celebrities Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, Soulja Boy, Austin Mahone, Michele Mason, Lil Yachty, Ne-Yo, and Akon — invested $30 million in Donald Trump’s World Liberty Financial, becoming the cryptocurrency’s largest investor.

(In case you need reminding, Sun is the guy who just paid $6.2 million for a banana taped to a wall.)

For context, on October 15, World Liberty Financial launched with the goal of “onboarding Web2 users to Web3 with the Trump brand,” according to its “gold paper”:

A key part of our mission at World Liberty Financial is to leverage the global reach and recognition of the Trump brand to bring as many Web2 users into the world of Web3 as possible. Inspired by Chief Crypto Advocate Donald J. Trump, we aim to introduce DeFi to a broader audience that may have previously been unfamiliar or hesitant to engage with decentralized assets and cryptocurrency.”

The project hoped to raise $300 million at a $1.5 billion valuation, but through three weeks, even after Trump’s election win, its fundraising efforts were lackluster. By November 6, for example, the project had only generated $14.8 million in sales, less than 5% of its expected $300 million, and it revised its fundraising target to $30 million.

There were a couple of issues facing the project from its inception, including that the sale was limited to accredited investors (which minimized retail participation), and the coin was only available on WLF’s website. With a $30 million investment, Sun effectively tripled the total outside capital put into the project.

With respect to this project, that $30 million number is pretty significant, because WLF needed to raise at least that much money for Trump to receive any proceeds from the project. From the project’s gold paper (emphasis ours):

$30 million of initial net protocol revenues will be held in a reserve controlled by a WLF Multisig to cover operating expenses, indemnities, and obligations. Net protocol revenues include revenues to WLF from any source, including without limitation platform use fees, token sale proceeds, advertising or other sources of revenue, after deduction of agreed expenses and reserves for WLF’s continued operations. The remainder of net protocol revenues will be paid to DT Marks DEFI LLC, Axiom Management Group, LLC WC Digital Fi LLC, which are entities affiliated with our founders and certain service providers (Initial Supporters). 

World Liberty Financial agrees that DT Marks DEFI LLC will receive 22.5 billion $WLFI tokens and a right to receive 75% of the net protocol revenues as defined in the services agreement after deduction of agreed operating expenses and the initial treasury reserve.

DT Marks is a Delaware-based company whose owners and principals include Donald Trump. That vehicle is in line to receive 75% of net protocol revenues after accounting for the initial $30 million of reserves, and Justin Sun’s investment pushed it over that threshold.

So what, exactly, is WLF planning to do? According to the gold paper, it will “help safeguard the US Dollar’s future as the global reserve currency,” though what exactly that looks like has yet to be determined. Additionally, WLF holders don’t have voting rights on the governance of the project and the coins are nontransferable, meaning that those who invested can’t sell them. 

While Sun told Bloomberg that the investment is “not related to any political purpose,” the project doesnt appear to have any purpose at all besides sending 75% of protocol revenue to Trump’s Delaware shell company and 25% of protocol money to a Puerto Rican LLC, Axiom Management Group. But who knows, maybe WLF is going to prove to be an integral part of a strong US dollar.

More Crypto

See all Crypto
crypto

Crypto platform BlockFills halts withdrawals

Crypto lending and trading platform BlockFills has halted customer withdrawals amid the current market downturn, according to The Wall Street Journal, a development that recalls the broader meltdown of the 2022 crypto bear market, albeit on a much smaller scale.

This morning, bitcoin dipped below $67,000, and it was hovering around that level midafternoon, struggling to recover from last week’s bloodbath.

“BlockFills is working tirelessly to bring this matter to a conclusion and will continue to regularly update our clients as developments warrant,” a spokesperson told the WSJ.

The Chicago-based, Susquehanna-backed company’s “suspension was put in place last week but remains in effect,” the Financial Times reported Wednesday.

The company, which serves institutional clients, handled $60 billion in trading volume in 2025, per the FT. 

Ethan Buchman, CEO of Cycles, told Sherwood News that BlockFills halting withdrawals is a harsh reminder that, despite changes since the panic of 2022, the crypto industry still has a long way to go in developing off-chain risk infrastructure with stronger standards for underwriting, clearing, and settlement.

crypto

Ethereum ETF holders still “diamond-handing” despite hurting more than their bitcoin counterparts

Holders of spot ethereum ETFs are in more pain than bitcoin investors. 

The price of ethereum stands around $1,940 as of Wednesday morning, representing about a 45% drop from $3,500, the average cost basis of spot ethereum ETF holders, according to Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart. 

The losses of ethereum ETF holders are larger than bitcoin fund investors based on available data. Bitcoin is trading at $68,822, representing an 18% slide from the the cost basis for all its ETFs of $83,983, data from Glassnode shows

While facing larger losses than their bitcoin ETF peers, the vast majority of ethereum ETF buyers have stayed put. “The net inflows into the ETH ETFs have gone from about $15 billion down below $12 billion. This is a much worse selloff than the Bitcoin ETFs on a relative basis, but still fairly decent diamond hands in grand scheme (for now),” Seyffart said on Tuesday on X.

crypto

Meme coins have lost all their 2026 gains and continue to dive

Despite having an early lead in year-to-date gains, meme coins have round-tripped and bled even more. 

For example, frog-based token pepe was up 75% in the first four days of January, but is now about 8% lower than where it started the year. Dogecoin, shiba inu, bonk, pengu, dogwifhat, and trump tell a similar story: posting a positive gain and then slumping into the red. 

Screenshot 2026-02-09 at 11.32.10 AM.png
The year-to-date price performances of the top meme coins by market capitalization (TradingView)

Meme coins, cryptocurrencies based on internet jokes that are often critiqued for lacking utility, are reflexive: they can lead gains during bullish market conditions, but see sharper declines in bearish ones. The entire category of meme coins has shed 25.8% of its valuation in the year so far, data from blockchain analytics firm Artemis shows.

The price action of meme coins comes amid a broader market decline that saw bitcoin drop to $63,000 last week as its peers revisited cycle lows

“The market has, in large, been bleeding, whether major, altcoin, or meme,” according to Nicolai Søndergaard, research analyst at on-chain data firm Nansen. “It is not surprising to me to see that larger memes as well have been trending down.”

He told Sherwood News, “If we also consider the fact that there are less active wallets now compared to a few months ago, it also makes sense that larger ‘household’ memes would decline as money shifts around to the next shiny thing.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.