Business
Hims & Hers Big Game commercial
A screenshot of Hims & Hers’ Super Bowl commercial (Sherwood News)

The cutoff day for copycat Ozempic and Wegovy is imminent. What’s next?

To drugmakers’ disdain, telehealth providers have pushed “personalized” versions of GLP-1s, which they might be able to continue selling after May 22.

J. Edward Moreno
5/21/25 12:27PM

Pharmacies that sell compounded semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy, will have to stop making exact copies after Thursday, throwing a wrench in the business models of telehealth companies that made a killing selling cheaper versions of the popular weight-loss drugs.

Before February 21, semaglutide was in shortage, which allowed pharmacies to make exact copies of it to fill the gaps in demand. This led to a boom in sales for telehealth companies like Hims & Hers and others that emerged, offering semaglutide for a fraction of the price of branded versions sold by its patent holder, Novo Nordisk.

When the Food and Drug Administration declared that the drug is no longer in shortage, it gave compounding pharmacies a 90-day off-ramp period that ends on May 22. But that doesn’t necessarily mean the party is over for the telehealth companies that rode the GLP-1 wave.

Personalization

Compounding pharmacies can still sell adjusted versions of drugs that aren’t in shortage based on a patient’s need, such as an allergy to a certain ingredient or to make a dose that the drugmaker doesn’t manufacture. The latter is particularly common for semaglutide.

Novo manufactures pens with set doses, while compounding pharmacies typically produce vials based on a prescription. Pharmacies and telehealth providers say a high rate of side effects leads doctors to prescribe versions of the drug that Novo doesn’t make, often referring to them as “personalized” or “customized.”

Patients who get a GLP-1 prescription via telehealth platforms typically fill out a survey and briefly speak to a physician — the process can take as little as 15 minutes. Drugmakers say telehealth companies likely steer patients toward mass-produced, “personalized” versions of their drugs so they can keep selling them. Hims, for one, insisted on its most recent earnings call that it does not influence providers.

Tirzepatide offers an early look

Tirzepatide — the active ingredient in Zepbound and Mounjaro, Eli Lilly’s GLP-1 drugs — was taken off the shortage list in December. There are significantly fewer patients on compounded tirzepatide than semaglutide, so the scale of patients and companies affected by the May 22 deadline is much greater, but it offers an early look at how things might go with semaglutide.

Many telehealth companies didn’t stop selling personalized compounded tirzepatide. Then Eli Lilly came for them.

In one case, it sent a cease and desist letter to OrderlyMeds, which responded by saying the warning meant “nothing.” Then Lilly sued four telehealth providers — Mochi Health, Fella Health, Willow Health, and Henry Meds — accusing them of mass producing “personalized” or “tailored” versions of their patented drug.

What’s next for Hims?

About $230 million of Hims’ $1.5 billion in revenue last year came from selling compounded semaglutide. It’s unclear how much revenue Hims will be able to keep from personalized semaglutide sales.

The company’s stock took a hit after the FDA shortage was lifted, but it has rebounded significantly as investors got a clearer picture of how Hims’ would handle the regulatory landscape. Weight loss is the company’s fastest-growing segment, and it dedicated a Super Bowl commercial to it in February.

Hims has diversified its weight-loss portfolio to include other products, including through a recent partnership with Novo that allows them to offer Wegovy, the drugmaker’s branded semaglutide pen. The company said it expects revenue from its weight-loss business to reach $725 million in 2025.

There’s also the possibility that Hims and others may be hit with a lawsuit from Novo similar to the one Lilly fired off last month. Novo recently pushed out its CEO, in part because its GLP-1 sales are slowing down and failing to impress investors.

More Business

See all Business
business

Fox and News Corp slide as investors digest $3.3 billion Murdoch succession settlement

Fox and News Corp shares dropped on Tuesday after Rupert Murdoch’s heirs agreed to a $3.3 billion settlement to resolve a long-running succession drama.

Under the deal, Prudence, Elisabeth, and James Murdoch will each receive about $1.1 billion, paid for in part by Fox selling 16.9 million Class B voting shares and News Corp selling 14.2 million shares. The stock sales will raise roughly $1.37 billion on behalf of the three heirs.

The new trust for Lachlan Murdoch will now control about 36.2% of Fox’s Class B shares and roughly 33.1% of News Corp’s stock, granting him uncontested voting authority over both companies for the next 25 years. Originally, the Murdoch trust was designed to hand over voting control of Fox and News Corp to Prudence, Elisabeth, Lachlan, and James after his death.

Investors are weighing the trade-off. Clear leadership under Lachlan may resolve conflict internally, but the share dilution, executed at a roughly 4.5% discount, means long-term investors now hold slightly less clout than before.

Both companies’ stocks were trading close to all-time highs prior to the announcement.

385 ✈️ 434

Boeing on Tuesday announced that it delivered 57 commercial jets in August, its best total for the month in seven years. That brings its year-to-date delivery total to 385 planes, eclipsing its full-year 2024 figure by about 11%.

The August figure marked Boeing’s second-highest delivery total of 2025 and represented a 43% jump from the same month last year. Through August, Boeing has boosted its deliveries by 50% from last year.

The plane maker is still trailing its European rival Airbus, which delivered 61 planes in August and 434 year to date.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.