Business
Collision 2022 - Day One
Snowflake CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy (Eóin Noonan / Getty Images)
Weird Money

Snowflake’s business is selling its own stock to employees

Snowflake's stock-based compensation has been more than 40% of its revenues since going public, and investors are losing their patience.

Jack Raines

A favorite accounting trick for publicly-traded companies is to exclude stock-based compensation from EBITDA and cash flow to paint an optimistic picture of company performance. For example, if a company’s net income is negative, but its stock-based compensation is larger than its net loss, adding back stock-based compensation in your financial statements can give you positive operating cash flow. The (incredibly-oversimplified) rationale is, “We’re not actually spending money, we’re just issuing new shares to employees. Why waste time focusing on stock-based comp?” Neat trick, right?

A different, but related, trick that companies love is to announce share buybacks to distract investors from high levels of stock-based compensation. Basically, company management will announce that it’s buying back, like, $500 million of stock, which sounds really good! Except, if the company’s stock-based compensation is more than $500 million over that period, it’s still a net-negative for investors. Think about it like this: while, yes, stock-based compensation is not a “cash expense” for the company, it is a very real expense for shareholders, because their stake in the company gets diluted.

On Wednesday, Snowflake, a data warehouse provider that went public in 2020, reported its Q2 2025 (its 2024 fiscal year ended on January 31, 2024) earnings, and the results were a masterclass in redistributing wealth from shareholders to employees. Snowflake’s stock-based compensation for the quarter was ~$373 million, or 43% of its $869 million in revenue. This matches a trend from the last three years, where Snowflake’s full-year stock-based compensation was 55%, 43%, and 44% of revenues in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively.

For context, Snap, which has long been cited as one of the more egregious examples of high stock-based compensation, had stock-based compensation worth 20% of revenue last quarter, compared to 30% last year.

Snowflake announced a $2.5 billion share buyback plan that expires in March 2027, which sounds nice, except the company’s total stock-based compensation over the last three years was approximately $2.8 billion. If this quarter’s equity compensation of $373 million is held constant through March 2027, more than $4 billion in new equity will be issued, and equity comp has only increased since the company went public. Buybacks sound nice, but they don’t mean much for investors if they fail to offset new issuances.

Snowflake lost ~$318 million on the quarter for a -36% profit margin, but if you removed stock-based compensation, the company would have posted a ~$56 million profit. It’s no surprise that investors are growing tired after three years of Snowflake awarding more than 40% of revenue as equity compensation as it remains  an unprofitable company with slowing revenue growth. The stock fell as much as 13% today, and it’s down more than 50% from its IPO.

If Snowflake’s new CEO wants to fix his stock price, he should start by reconsidering insiders’ equity grants.

More Business

See all Business
Family Watching Baseball On Tv

Netflix and Disney+ probably only added ad-tier subscribers this year, says Morgan Stanley

As streaming prices climb, ad-free subscribers are becoming a rarity.

Aldi Grand Opening

Discount stores are having a moment in America, drawing high- and low-income consumers alike

Everyone loves a deal in 2025 — and Aldi, Walmart, and Dollar Tree are all cashing in.

Millie Giles12/17/25
business

Report: OpenAI won’t pay a dime in cash for its 3-year licensing deal for Disney IP

More financial details behind the landmark deal that will grant OpenAI three years of access to Disney intellectual property are coming out, and they’re pretty surprising.

The deal will reportedly see OpenAI pay zero dollars in licensing fees, instead compensating Disney in stock warrants. It was previously reported that Disney would invest $1 billion into OpenAI as part of the agreement.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

business

Ford says it will take $19.5 billion in charges in a massive EV write-down

The EV business has marked a long stretch of losing for Ford, and today the automaker announced it will take $19.5 billion in charges tied, for the most part, to its EV division.

Ford said it’s launching a battery energy storage business, leveraging battery plants in Kentucky and Michigan to “provide solutions for energy infrastructure and growing data center demand.”

According to Ford, the changes will drive Ford’s electrified division to profitability by 2029. The company will stop making its electric F-150, the Lightning, and instead shift to an “extended-range electric vehicle” that includes a gas-powered generator.

The Detroit automaker also raised its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes outlook to “about $7 billion” from a range of $6 billion to $6.5 billion.

Ford’s write-down is one of the largest taken by a company as legacy automakers scale back on EVs, giving EV-only automakers a market share boost.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.