Business
Amex fees per card
Sherwood News

The credit card wars are heating up

Amex and Chase are betting the young and affluent will keep dropping over $600 a year on a premium card.

6/18/25 9:58AM

On Monday, American Express teased its “largest investment ever in a Card refresh” for its Platinum Card — a credit card that has transcended the simple swipe-and-sign, becoming something of a status symbol for young users willing to shell out $695 a year for travel and dining perks. One day later, JPMorgan Chase announced a revamp of its Sapphire Reserve, its rival lifestyle card, along with a whopping 45% hike in its annual fee to $795.

Chasing hard

The rivalry dates back to 2016, when Chase first launched the Sapphire card at $450, taking aim at Amex’s grip on the high-end market. Around that time, Amex began reversing its decade-long push into the mass market — where it had been launching no-fee cards to attract budget-conscious consumers — and refocused on the premium segment it had carved out as far back as the 1960s.

Since then, the 174-year-old company has leaned hard into its premium pricing: over the past decade, its average fee per card has more than doubled to an all-time high of $103. Cardholders seem unbothered by the expense: Amex added another 13 million new accounts last year, and cards-in-force hit a record 147 million

To justify the rising costs, both firms are doubling down on perks. Chase is expanding hotel, dining, and lifestyle credits, as well as launching a high-spend business version. Amex, meanwhile, promised new vague benefits for the coming fall “that will far, far, far exceed the annual fee,” according to its executive.

Of course, lending money to people who can’t wait to spend big on dining and travel comes with risk, and younger consumers — the target for both cards — have the highest credit card delinquency rates of any age group.

More Business

See all Business
business

Volkswagen is reportedly closing in on its own, separate tariff deal with the US

In a bid to get its own tariff rate below the 15% applied to most EU exports, Volkswagen is dangling big US investments.

Speaking at a trade show Monday, VW CEO Oliver Blume said the automaker is in advanced talks on a deal to limit its own tariff burden. Volkswagen reported a tariff cost of $1.5 billion in the first half of the year.

Speaking to Bloomberg TV, Blume said the company is in close contact with the Trump administration and has had “good talks” about its separate deal. The current 15% tariff rate on EU vehicles would still “be a burden for Volkswagen,” Blume said.

A company reaching a tariff deal separate from its home country isn’t typical, though there’s already precedent this year, with Apple’s $100 billion US investment deal amid chip tariffs and President Trump’s threats to add a levy to smartphones. Nvidia and AMD similarly struck a deal to receive the ability to sell chips in China and in exchange agreed to give the US 15% of the revenue from those sales.

Speaking to Bloomberg TV, Blume said the company is in close contact with the Trump administration and has had “good talks” about its separate deal. The current 15% tariff rate on EU vehicles would still “be a burden for Volkswagen,” Blume said.

A company reaching a tariff deal separate from its home country isn’t typical, though there’s already precedent this year, with Apple’s $100 billion US investment deal amid chip tariffs and President Trump’s threats to add a levy to smartphones. Nvidia and AMD similarly struck a deal to receive the ability to sell chips in China and in exchange agreed to give the US 15% of the revenue from those sales.

Elon Musk at Donald Trump Rally At Madison Square Garden In NYC

The Tesla directors who just proposed giving Elon Musk a trillion dollars say it’s “critical” he stay out of politics

Even still, the company doesn’t appear to be putting up hard guardrails for Musk’s political ambitions.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.