Business
JP Morgan Chase Reports Decline In Net Income In Third Quarter
ATMs at a Chase Bank (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
Weird Money

JPMorgan is coming after the infinite money glitchers

Turns out, the glitch to “create” money out of thin air was probably just check fraud.

Jack Raines

On August 31, 2024, an interesting trend caught fire on social media: the Chase Bank “unlimited money glitch.”

Multiple TikToks of folks withdrawing large sums of money that they didn’t have in their accounts from Chase ATMs went viral, prompting others to follow suit, such as X user @ionfeellnunn, who shared a photo of him depositing more than $80,000 before tweeting “chase goin outta business after this.”

The glitch, it turns out, was really just check fraud. Chase customers were mobile depositing fraudulent checks, then withdrawing the cash from ATMs before the checks cleared. Chase quickly rectified the issue, locking the accounts of users who took advantage of the glitch and hitting them with negative balances to account for the cash they withdrew, leaving one user with about -$40,000 in “ATM deposit error” charges. (As a general rule, any “glitch” that involves taking tens of thousands of dollars that aren’t yours from one of the country’s largest financial institutions probably won’t work. Not financial advice!)

On Monday, CNBC reported the next chapter in the infinite-money-glitch saga: JPMorgan is now suing customers who allegedly stole money before their checks bounced. 

“The bank on Monday filed lawsuits in at least three federal courts, taking aim at some of the people who withdrew the highest amounts in the so-called infinite money glitch that went viral on TikTok and other social media platforms in late August. A Houston case involves a man who owes JPMorgan $290,939.47 after an unidentified accomplice deposited a counterfeit $335,000 check at an ATM, according to the bank… ​

The other lawsuits filed Monday are in courts including Miami and the Central District of California, and involve cases where JPMorgan says customers owe the bank sums ranging from about $80,000 to $141,000.”

Check fraud has existed as long as checks have existed. British criminals used “check kiting” in 18th-century England to steal money by taking advantage of the time between when a check was tendered and when the money was to be collected by the receiver from a bank. It’s nice to see that, ~250 years later, TikTokers have rebranded “check kiting” to “infinite money glitch,” though they made the authorities’ jobs much easier by leaving a digital paper trail of their antics across social media.

I do respect the audacity of the Houston man mentioned in this story, though. I’m guessing he saw the viral “money glitch” videos and thought, “I wonder how much money I can really withdraw from one of these ATMs,” and he decided that $290,939.47 would be a good place to start. And then, at some point, JPMorgan tried to call or email him about that $290,939.47…

“In each case, JPMorgan says its security team reached out to the alleged fraudster, but it hasn’t been repaid for the phony checks, in violation of the deposit agreement that customers sign when creating an account with the bank.”

And he decided, “You know what? I’m not going to answer that call.” Considering the amount of personal information one has to disclose to open their bank account, I’m confident that JPMorgan will get most of its money back, especially from its larger violators, but I appreciate the fact that folks out there stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, and then just ignored JPMorgan’s calls.

More Business

See all Business
Family Watching Baseball On Tv

Netflix and Disney+ probably only added ad-tier subscribers this year, says Morgan Stanley

As streaming prices climb, ad-free subscribers are becoming a rarity.

Aldi Grand Opening

Discount stores are having a moment in America, drawing high- and low-income consumers alike

Everyone loves a deal in 2025 — and Aldi, Walmart, and Dollar Tree are all cashing in.

Millie Giles12/17/25
business

Report: OpenAI won’t pay a dime in cash for its 3-year licensing deal for Disney IP

More financial details behind the landmark deal that will grant OpenAI three years of access to Disney intellectual property are coming out, and they’re pretty surprising.

The deal will reportedly see OpenAI pay zero dollars in licensing fees, instead compensating Disney in stock warrants. It was previously reported that Disney would invest $1 billion into OpenAI as part of the agreement.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

business

Ford says it will take $19.5 billion in charges in a massive EV write-down

The EV business has marked a long stretch of losing for Ford, and today the automaker announced it will take $19.5 billion in charges tied, for the most part, to its EV division.

Ford said it’s launching a battery energy storage business, leveraging battery plants in Kentucky and Michigan to “provide solutions for energy infrastructure and growing data center demand.”

According to Ford, the changes will drive Ford’s electrified division to profitability by 2029. The company will stop making its electric F-150, the Lightning, and instead shift to an “extended-range electric vehicle” that includes a gas-powered generator.

The Detroit automaker also raised its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes outlook to “about $7 billion” from a range of $6 billion to $6.5 billion.

Ford’s write-down is one of the largest taken by a company as legacy automakers scale back on EVs, giving EV-only automakers a market share boost.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.