Business
Austin Texas Capitol building sunset aerial with downtown skyline background
Austin's Capitol (Getty Images)

Austin was supposed to be America's next big tech hub. Here's how it all went wrong.

Austin has lost its hot growth streak as the market cools.

Jack Raines

In October 2021, Elon Musk made headlines when he announced that he would be moving Tesla’s headquarters to Austin, Texas, following similar moves from tech giants Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Oracle the year before. These company relocations were part of a broader demographic shift: Austin was the fastest-growing metro area with at least a million people in 2021, with 107,000 people moving from California to Texas that year alone.

But three years later, the momentum is fizzling. Last year Austin lost its 12-year streak as the fastest-growing large metro area in the US, and Texas’ capital currently has the third-largest office-vacancy rate among major US metro areas, behind Dallas and Houston.

In April, Oracle chairman Larry Ellison said the software giant would be moving its world headquarters to Nashville, Tennessee, in a blow to Austin; and that same day, Tesla announced it was eliminating 2,688 jobs in Austin as part of a restructuring. In the venture-capital world, startup accelerator Techstars announced in December it was closing its Austin operations too. Meanwhile, Bloomberg noted the number of companies relocating their headquarters or major operations to Austin kept declining, from 64 in 2022 to 37 in 2023, to just 11 so far in 2024.

What went wrong in Austin?

For starters, the pandemic proved to be a big but short-lived tailwind for Austin’s growth.

America is a coastal country with four cities: New York and DC for finance and politics, and San Francisco and LA for tech and media. Every large financial firm in the world has its headquarters or a major office in New York. Meantime, the venture-capital industry in San Francisco dwarfs the rest of the country, with Bay Area startups raising $170 billion between 2019 and 2021 (compared to $11.8 billion in Austin).

Residents of San Francisco and Manhattan pay a premium for access to social and professional opportunities these cities offer. When companies around the country told their employees to work from home indefinitely, in 2020, and restaurants and bars enforced social-distancing policies, those opportunities disappeared, and paying coastal-city rent to answer Zoom calls from your apartment didn’t make sense. Why not move somewhere cheaper?

Austin became one of the more popular destinations.

It was cheaper and warmer than the coastal cities, dozens of companies were establishing larger offices there, and pandemic restrictions were more lax. Most important, you could keep your salary while cutting your living expenses in half. The appeal of Austin was obvious, and you would've been crazy not to take advantage of the geographic arbitrage.

However, that arbitrage didn't last long. While New York's and San Francisco’s populations fell by 2.5% and 3.7% from 2020 to 2023, Austin’s population grew by 7.5%, and the influx of new residents pressured the housing market.

As thousands of people moved to the city, housing prices jumped more than 60% from 2020 to spring 2022, despite per-capita income increasing by just 23% in that same time. By 2022, Austin was no longer the bargain it used to be, and, according to Redfin, more homebuyers are now looking to leave Austin than move in, for the first time on record.

Beyond home prices, Austin's infrastructure has struggled to keep up with its population growth. In February 2021, a winter storm caused Austin's worst energy infrastructure failure in history, with millions of people across Texas losing power, causing hundreds of deaths, and last summer, Austin almost had power blackouts during a series of brutal heat waves.

While many workers moved to Austin to work remotely during the pandemic, the city failed to establish a critical mass of talent large enough disrupt one of the larger coastal cities, and its lack of accessibility (Austin's primary airport is only the 27th-largest hub in the country) proved to be an issue as companies called their employees back to the office and Zoom calls were replaced by in-person meetings.

Austin’s pandemic growth ultimately played a large role in its undoing, as soaring real-estate prices forced many out of the market, and unlike coastal cities, the Texas capital had neither the jobs nor the weather to persuade them to pay up and stay.

More Business

See all Business
Family Watching Baseball On Tv

Netflix and Disney+ probably only added ad-tier subscribers this year, says Morgan Stanley

As streaming prices climb, ad-free subscribers are becoming a rarity.

Aldi Grand Opening

Discount stores are having a moment in America, drawing high- and low-income consumers alike

Everyone loves a deal in 2025 — and Aldi, Walmart, and Dollar Tree are all cashing in.

Millie Giles12/17/25
business

Report: OpenAI won’t pay a dime in cash for its 3-year licensing deal for Disney IP

More financial details behind the landmark deal that will grant OpenAI three years of access to Disney intellectual property are coming out, and they’re pretty surprising.

The deal will reportedly see OpenAI pay zero dollars in licensing fees, instead compensating Disney in stock warrants. It was previously reported that Disney would invest $1 billion into OpenAI as part of the agreement.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

business

Ford says it will take $19.5 billion in charges in a massive EV write-down

The EV business has marked a long stretch of losing for Ford, and today the automaker announced it will take $19.5 billion in charges tied, for the most part, to its EV division.

Ford said it’s launching a battery energy storage business, leveraging battery plants in Kentucky and Michigan to “provide solutions for energy infrastructure and growing data center demand.”

According to Ford, the changes will drive Ford’s electrified division to profitability by 2029. The company will stop making its electric F-150, the Lightning, and instead shift to an “extended-range electric vehicle” that includes a gas-powered generator.

The Detroit automaker also raised its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes outlook to “about $7 billion” from a range of $6 billion to $6.5 billion.

Ford’s write-down is one of the largest taken by a company as legacy automakers scale back on EVs, giving EV-only automakers a market share boost.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.