Tech
Stargate I in Abilene, Texas.
Stargate I in Abilene, Texas (OpenAI)

Rising ambitions and skyrocketing costs: Here’s what we know about Project Stargate

As the number of gigawatts and GPUs grows, so do the questions about how the massive data center project will be paid for.

As tech giants like Meta, xAI, Microsoft, and Amazon race to build colossal AI data centers, one massive undertaking stands apart from the rest in its ambitious goals: Project Stargate.

In the eight months since Stargate was announced — backed by partners OpenAI, Oracle, SoftBank, and Nvidia, which have pledged hundreds of billions toward it — the scale and ambition of the project have grown.

Still, details are scant and questions have arisen about how the companies involved will raise the eye-popping amounts of capital needed for the pricey data centers described in the plan. 

A time lapse of Stargate I construction, in Abilene, Texas. Imagery from April 26, 2024, to September 29, 2025 (Copernicus)

Let’s dive into the details of what we know about Stargate’s plans in the US, and look at the questions that remain unanswered. 

“Project Ludicrous”

In January 2025, on the first full day of his second term, President Trump announced the largest “AI infrastructure project, by far, in history” standing alongside SoftBank founder and CEO Masayoshi Son, Oracle founder and CTO Larry Ellison, and OpenAI cofounder and CEO Sam Altman.

Trump described Project Stargate as a new American company that will be investing $500 billion in the US and creating over 100,000 jobs “almost immediately.” The plan was audacious and at a scale without precedent. 

Ellison, Son, and Altman spilled some details: 

  • The first site was a massive data center already under construction in Abilene, Texas.

  • The project consisted of 10 sites, and each building would be 500,000 square feet.

  • The plan would expand to 20 sites.

  • Son said SoftBank would invest $100 billion “immediately,” and the remaining $400 billion over four years.

While plans were being developed, the effort went by the code name “Project Ludicrous.”

OpenAI’s initial press release identified the equity partners in Stargate as SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX — United Arab Emirates’ state-owned investment fund. Arm, Microsoft, and Nvidia were listed as technology partners. 

Stargate I, the first site of the project, will reportedly cost about $12 billion to build. That’s not counting the 64,000 Nvidia GB200 GPUs that will fill the data center, totaling 1.2 gigawatts of computing power, the cost of which is in the tens of billions.  

After the January announcement, we didn’t hear much about the project until March, when Bloomberg reported that SoftBank was seeking a $16.5 billion bridge loan for it — the largest dollar-based loan that the company has taken on, resulting in two ratings agencies warning about it creating potential financial strains. 

In May, Bloomberg reported that SoftBank’s initial $100 billion investment had yet to materialize, even though it was supposed to happen “immediately,” and that the company had yet to formalize details of the financing. April’s trade chaos and the shocking effects of DeepSeek’s R1 model spooked investors, complicating SoftBank’s fundraising efforts. 

4.5, 7, 10 gigawatts

In July, the companies gave an update on the project and announced an expansion. Oracle and OpenAI outlined an agreement to develop an additional 4.5 gigawatts of capacity in US data centers under the Stargate umbrella, expanding upon the original 1.2 gigawatts planned for Stargate I. OpenAI said parts of the Stargate I facility were up and running and that deliveries of the first of 2 million Nvidia GPUs had arrived.  

A flurry of eye-popping AI infrastructure deals between Stargate partners followed.

In September, when Oracle announced its first-quarter earnings, shares rocketed up 30% when the company announced it had “remaining performance obligations” — signed deals that were backlogged — that were “likely to exceed half-a-trillion dollars.” The next day it was reported that part of that backlog was a huge deal with OpenAI.

OpenAI had signed an agreement with Oracle to buy $300 billion worth of cloud computing from the database giant over five years. But the deal raised serious questions about how exactly OpenAI is going to find this money, as it currently expects to burn $115 billion through 2029.

A few weeks later, Stargate partners OpenAI and Nvidia announced that they had signed a “letter of intent” for a strategic partnership. The blockbuster agreement consisted of a $100 billion investment in OpenAI by Nvidia to build and deploy “at least 10 gigawatts” of AI data centers, filled with Nvidia’s next-gen Vera Rubin chips. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told CNBC that 10 gigawatts’ worth of computing power means “roughly 4 million, 5 million GPUs,” which he said was twice the amount that the company shipped last year. Nvidia’s $100 billion investment would be spread out in $10 billion payments, as each gigawatt of capacity was deployed. 

According to a report by Reuters, the unusual agreement gave Nvidia nonvoting shares in OpenAI, and OpenAI would then use that capital to pay Nvidia for its chips, raising concerns of a “circular deal,” which industry observers fear might be a harbinger of a massive AI bubble.

While the announcement did not specifically say that the deal was part of Stargate, Nvidia is the supplier of the AI and networking hardware for the project, and given the massive scale, it is sure to overlap with Stargate.

Power-hungry

OpenAI appears to be pulling in substantial revenue, but it’s also burning cash at an alarming rate. The Information reports that the company expects to end the year with $13 billion in revenue, while burning $8.5 billion in cash. The company has some extremely optimistic projections for growth, which it hopes will lead to AGI and hopefully a viable business model along the way. (OpenAI didn’t respond to a request for comment.)

Even 10 gigawatts of computing power might not be enough for Altman, who wants much, much more than that. According to The Information, Altman has said internally that he wants 250 gigawatts by 2033 (which could cost up to $12.5 trillion). 

More Tech

See all Tech
South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

tech

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

tech

Tesla used skewed data in push for European FSD approval, Reuters finds

Tesla has used highly questionable safety stats in an effort to win over European regulators and rekindle sales in the region, according to a Reuters investigation.

Tesla reportedly pitched regulators in Sweden and the Netherlands with claims that its Full Self-Driving (FSD) tech is over 7x safer than human drivers. However, independent researchers told Reuters that the stats are misleading because Tesla compares airbag-deployment crashes involving FSD-equipped vehicles with much broader US crash statistics, while also benchmarking newer Teslas against the entire US vehicle fleet, which is significantly older on average.

Despite the flawed metrics, the Dutch regulator approved FSD in April, saying its decision was based on its own “tests, analyses and verifications,” and Tesla is now pushing for EU-wide clearance. A version of FSD is currently available in five European markets.

Despite the flawed metrics, the Dutch regulator approved FSD in April, saying its decision was based on its own “tests, analyses and verifications,” and Tesla is now pushing for EU-wide clearance. A version of FSD is currently available in five European markets.

tech
Rani Molla

Report: Microsoft weighs Xbox spin-off amid major overhaul

Microsoft is reportedly considering spinning out or restructuring its struggling Xbox unit, per The Information. While new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, who took over in February, is preparing for layoffs, shes simultaneously planning to boost investment in its biggest franchises like “Halo,” “Fallout,” and “Minecraft.”

The latest potential shake-up comes as the gaming division battles major headwinds, following a massive 33% plunge in Q3 console sales and a recent move to slash Game Pass prices while removing new Call of Duty titles.

The latest potential shake-up comes as the gaming division battles major headwinds, following a massive 33% plunge in Q3 console sales and a recent move to slash Game Pass prices while removing new Call of Duty titles.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.