Tech
Open AI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman
(Kim Jae-Hwan/Getty Images)

OpenAI’s o1-pro is the most expensive AI model in the industry

No other model by a major AI company comes even close.

OpenAI just released the pricing for its o1-pro reasoning model, which draws on an insane amount of computing power to use multistep “reasoning” through problems to get better responses to prompts. This computing power doesn’t come cheap: the new pricing is the highest for any major model in the industry today, and by a lot.

As a regular human user, you can use a lot of AI tools for free, but maybe you pay $20 per month for OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus or Google’s Gemini Advanced if you use it a lot. But that’s not where the money is.

When companies are hooking their services up to AI platforms behind the scenes via an API (application programming interface), the costs can really add up. So what is the standard unit of measure for AI costs?

API pricing for AI models is measured by how much data (words, images, video, audio) you put into a model and how much data gets spit back out to you. The output costs more than the input.

The common measure for this is 1 million “tokens.” In AI parlance, a “token” is like an atomic unit of data. When text is input into a model, the words and sentences get broken down into these tokens for processing, which could be a few letters. For OpenAI’s models, one token is roughly four characters in English. So a paragraph is about 100 tokens, give or take.

For a million tokens, think Robert Caro’s epic biography of Robert Moses, “The Power Broker” — which I’m currently halfway through — a 2.3-pound, 1,300-page beast of a book. A rough estimate of this tome comes out to about 850,000 tokens.

If you put 1 million tokens into some of the leading models today, you could probably pay for it with just a few coins. For OpenAI GPT-4o Mini, the input would cost you only $0.15, while the output would cost $0.60. Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash would cost you a single penny for the input and $0.04 for the output.

OpenAI o1-pro’s pricing for 1 million tokens of input is $150, and $600 for the output.

In a tweet announcing the pricing, OpenAI wrote, “It uses more compute than o1 to provide consistently better responses.”

It’s worth pointing out that there are huge differences in the capabilities of these models — some are very small and built for specific use cases like running on a mobile device, and others are massive for advanced tasks, so differences in prices are to be expected. But as you can see from the chart, OpenAI’s pricing stands apart from the crowd.

Pricing is a key issue for OpenAI as it struggles to find a viable business model to cover the enormous costs of running these services. The company’s recent pivot to release only “reasoning” models like o1-pro going forward means much higher computing costs, as evidenced by the cost of solving individual ARC-AGI puzzles for $3,400 apiece.

Recently, The Information reported that OpenAI was considering charging $20,000 per month for “PhD-level agents.”

CEO Sam Altman said in January that OpenAI is losing money on its ChatGPT Pro product.

The company is reportedly raising money at a valuation of $340 billion, and in 2024 it was reported to have lost about $5 billion, after bringing in only $3.7 billion in revenue.

More Tech

See all Tech
South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26
tech
Jon Keegan

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

tech
Rani Molla

Tesla used skewed data in push for European FSD approval, Reuters finds

Tesla has used highly questionable safety stats in an effort to win over European regulators and rekindle sales in the region, according to a Reuters investigation.

Tesla reportedly pitched regulators in Sweden and the Netherlands with claims that its Full Self-Driving (FSD) tech is over 7x safer than human drivers. However, independent researchers told Reuters that the stats are misleading because Tesla compares airbag-deployment crashes involving FSD-equipped vehicles with much broader US crash statistics, while also benchmarking newer Teslas against the entire US vehicle fleet, which is significantly older on average.

Despite the flawed metrics, the Dutch regulator approved FSD in April, saying its decision was based on its own “tests, analyses and verifications,” and Tesla is now pushing for EU-wide clearance. A version of FSD is currently available in five European markets.

Despite the flawed metrics, the Dutch regulator approved FSD in April, saying its decision was based on its own “tests, analyses and verifications,” and Tesla is now pushing for EU-wide clearance. A version of FSD is currently available in five European markets.

tech
Rani Molla

Report: Microsoft weighs Xbox spin-off amid major overhaul

Microsoft is reportedly considering spinning out or restructuring its struggling Xbox unit, per The Information. While new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, who took over in February, is preparing for layoffs, shes simultaneously planning to boost investment in its biggest franchises like “Halo,” “Fallout,” and “Minecraft.”

The latest potential shake-up comes as the gaming division battles major headwinds, following a massive 33% plunge in Q3 console sales and a recent move to slash Game Pass prices while removing new Call of Duty titles.

The latest potential shake-up comes as the gaming division battles major headwinds, following a massive 33% plunge in Q3 console sales and a recent move to slash Game Pass prices while removing new Call of Duty titles.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.