Tech
Sam Altman at Italian Tech Week 2024
Sam Altman at Italian Tech Week 2024 (Stefano Guidi/Getty Images)

OpenAI’s leadership is in upheaval, but overall turnover looks shockingly low

We cross-checked the open letter most OpenAI employees signed against their publicly available employment data to see who stayed, who left, and where they work now.

OpenAI, the startup that has become synonymous with artificial intelligence itself, has seen a string of high-profile exits recently. 

Mira Murati, previously OpenAI’s chief technology officer, announced her departure last Wednesday. A few hours later, Bob McGrew, OpenAI’s chief research officer, and Barret Zoph, a vice president who ran a research team, both announced their resignations, too. They follow the departure of co-founders Ilya Sutskever and Andrej Karpathy, researcher Jan Leike and half of the entire AI safety research team, as well as an “extended leave of absence” for co-founder and president Greg Brockman. Only three of the 11 cofounders — Sam Altman, Wojciech Zaremba and technically Brockman — are still at the company.

Even though that seems like a serious shakeup since the board fired, and then brought back, Altman, the vast majority of OpenAI employees have stayed, according to a data analysis. During the Altman ouster saga last year, employees of OpenAI en masse signed an open letter in support of Altman — which gives us a snapshot of nearly every employee at the company at that time. We took all 702 names on the latest published version of the list we could find and asked Live Data Technologies to analyze how many OpenAI employees who signed the open letter have changed employers based on publicly available employment data sources, including LinkedIn, since November. 

The number is surprisingly low: despite the high-profile exits, only 41 out of the 702 people — or about 6% — who signed the open letter to the board have left the company as of September 2024, according to the Live Data analysis. Of course, publicly available data is imperfect — employees may not have up-to-date info on their social pages or may not have announced their departure, or there might not be publicly available data on certain employees at all. Still, when the data spans hundreds of employees, you can paint a pretty decent picture. 

A lot has changed at OpenAI since the Altman saga. Many of the company’s most important workers have left. And the roughly 770-employee non-profit has expanded drastically, becoming a 1,700-employee for-profit company. But its base of workers who were there when the Altman drama played out seems to have remained. 

Here are some notable moves at OpenAI since November, according to various press reports and employee posts. Many of the researchers and executives below did not sign the open letter.

  • Andrej Karpathy, co-founder and research scientist at OpenAI, left in February.

  • William Sauders, a member of the Superalignment team, which focuses on AI safety, left in February. 

  • Cullen O’Keefe, a policy researcher, left in April.

  • Daniel Kokotajlo, a researcher on OpenAI’s governance division, left in April. He said that he quit OpenAI because “due to losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI”.

  • Kokotajlo told Fortune that nearly half of the 30 or so OpenAI staff who worked on long-term AI safety has left the company, including Jan Hendrik Kirchner, Collin Burns, Jeffrey Wu, Jonathan Uesato, Steven Bills, Yuri Burda, Todor Markov and cofounder John Schulman. (Schulman and Bills both joined rival Anthropic, and both signed the open letter in November.)

  • Jan Leike, head of alignment, resigned in May and joined Anthropic. 

  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist, left OpenAI to work on his own company Safe Superintelligence, in May. He was one of the board members who voted to fire Altman. 

  • Brockman said that he would take an extended leave of absence until the end of the year.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Tom Jones

Prediction markets have, predictably, been given a boost by the summer of sports

Major platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen huge upticks in users of late, thanks in no small part to what’s felt like a recent sporting smorgasbord, with major competitions across hockey, basketball, and soccer soaking up fans’ time (and spending, clearly) at the outset of summer.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26
tech
Jon Keegan

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.