Tech
US-ART-BASEL
Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and other billionaires depicted as robot dogs as part of an art installation called “Regular Animals” by digital artist Beeple during Art Basel 2025 in Miami (Chandan Khanna/Getty Images)

Meta and Tesla are funding the future with their core businesses — but only one of them is still growing

The two tech giants, on back-to-back earnings calls, made it sound like they’re selling the same AI-powered future. But the picture of the underlying businesses, and how they’re using AI to furnish current sales, couldn’t be more different.

Tesla and Meta are betting a lot of money on a future that does not yet exist.

Both companies posted better-than-expected earnings Wednesday, but Meta is trading through the roof Thursday while Tesla stock is in the red. That’s illustrative of how the stories they’re telling, though similar, have some important differences.

Tesla expects its capital expenditure to more than double this year to $20 billion. Meta plans to shell out $115 billion to $135 billion — so the midpoint would be about 70% more than what it spent in 2025. Both are using that cash to furnish their AI ambitions, which will supposedly bring new revenue sources.

For Tesla, that’s factories churning out AI robots and self-driving Cybercabs, as well as investment in the AI infrastructure that powers both. (Optimus robots are expected to go on sale next year, while Cybercabs are slated for production in the first half of this year — but Tesla consistently misses its own deadlines.)

For Meta, its AI spending is going toward future revenue sources that are even squishier. Talking about the promise of upcoming AI models on the earnings call yesterday, CEO Mark Zuckerberg was admittedly vague: “We’ll be able to have different products paired with those [models] that I think will facilitate different businesses for — businesses who use us and our platforms, as well as direct consumer businesses.”

Notably, both Meta and Tesla still get the vast majority of their revenue from their core business lines. Last quarter, 97% of Meta’s revenue came from ads, while 71% of Tesla’s revenue came from regular electric vehicles.

(Interestingly, Tesla announced that it was discontinuing two of its four main EV models, though data from Cox Automotive shows they represented only a tiny fraction of Tesla’s EV sales anyway. Still, the stock pulled back yesterday on that announcement.)

Both companies say they’re using their AI investments to boost their current businesses, but so far it’s only really working for Meta. Meta’s revenue grew 24% last quarter, as its AI investments helped grow ad sales. Tesla’s revenue fell 3% last quarter as softer vehicle sales outweighed gains in higher-margin services like Full Self-Driving subscriptions. Meta’s ad revenue also grew 24%, while Tesla’s automotive revenue fell 11%.

Tesla believes that someday its AI investments will enable truly driverless cars, which in turn will drive both vehicle sales and FSD subscriptions, but for now those capabilities are unproven.

During the earnings call, Bank of America analyst Justin Post asked Zuckerberg, “Can you do things beyond ads?”

Zuckerberg replied yes but didn’t have much to share.

“For the next couple of years, ads are going to be by far the most important driver of growth in our business,” he said.

For now, that’s good enough because its core business, unlike Tesla’s, is still growing.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Tom Jones

Prediction markets have, predictably, been given a boost by the summer of sports

Major platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen huge upticks in users of late, thanks in no small part to what’s felt like a recent sporting smorgasbord, with major competitions across hockey, basketball, and soccer soaking up fans’ time (and spending, clearly) at the outset of summer.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26
tech
Jon Keegan

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.