Markets
QE?

Investors turn towards China

China Xi Jinping Chinese Economy
Open for business! (Getty Images)

Is it actually time to get bullish on China?

Xi Jinping’s economy has gotten so bad, it might be good.

It isn’t going to make the New York Times best sellers list.

But the biggest book of the year, for investors, could well turn out to be a modest volume that hit bookshelves in late March, published by a niche Beijing imprint, Central Party Literature Press.

“Excerpts of Xi Jinping’s Speeches on Finance Work” probably doesn’t read like “The Big Short” (full disclosure: Haven’t read it), but the state-published compilation of financial directives from the CCP strongman has already caused waves in financial markets.

On March 28, the South China Morning Post reported that the book contains never-before-public statements from Xi seemingly urging the People’s Bank of China — the country’s powerful central bank — to boost purchases of Chinese government bonds.

"The People’s Bank of China must gradually increase the trading of treasury bonds in its open market operations,” Xi told officials during a central financial work conference on October 30.

For the uninitiated, that sounds like technocratic gobbledygook. But basically “open market operations” is how central bankers describe buying and selling financial assets, usually government bonds, in financial markets.

But Xi’s comments, appearing as China grapples with its worst economic challenges in decades, were seen as a remarkable hint that the the party may be considering the kind of money-printing policies — known as quantitative easing or QE — it has long avoided, as it struggles to revive its deeply dysfunctional economy.

This matters, for a couple reasons.

For one thing, it’s a sign of just how badly China’s economy is faring. While official GDP and employment figures — often looked upon skeptically by outside analysts — don’t appear too bad, there are other indications of entrenched problems.

After a massive real estate bust, demand for credit — the fuel for market economies — has collapsed. Consumer confidence is slumping. The country has slipped into deflation for months at a time. Government spending appears to be the main source of economic activity, but it requires large amounts of borrowing.

In recent decades, governments in similar straits have used central bank money-printing programs as part of a program to escape from such economic pickles.

The Bank of Japan pioneered them in the early 2000s, in the aftermath of a real estate and banking crisis that led to a recession. They weren’t especially successful at restarting growth, but the Bank of Japan doubled down on quantitative easing during the early 2010s.

The U.S. Federal Reserve also pursued quantitative easing for most of the decade that followed the financial crisis of 2008 and ensuing recession. It then restarted QE when Covid delivered another major jolt to the economy in 2020.

But beyond the economic issues, Chinese QE could also be a major development for markets, and an opportunity for traders.

That’s because, at least recently, when central banks have embraced QE, they’ve also sometimes ignited powerful, years-long stock market rallies.

A QE turning point?

Between the end of 2012 and the middle of 2015, Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 100%, as the BoJ doubled down on monetary easing, which it called “quantitative and qualitative easing.” Similarly, in the US, between the end of 2008 and the 2014 — when the Fed paused quantitative easing — the S&P 500 doubled in a years-long romp.

If China goes that way, this may turn out to have been the moment for global traders to dangle their well-pedicured toes back into Chinese markets. It’s been a long time since they’ve been tempted to do so.

For years, a string of issues has made China almost un-investable for global money. The Trump trade war. Saber-rattling over Taiwan. The government’s ham-fisted crackdown on its most innovative tech companies. COVID-19, and China’s growth-crushing lockdowns. Its housing bust. Its wobbly financial sector. And a government seemingly less interested in growth than its predecessors.

They’ve all combined to drive a flood of foreign capital out of the country.

It could be hard to coax it back, even as the party puts on its version of a charm offensive.

To be clear, we don’t know how close Beijing is to unleashing a Chinese version of QE, or if it will go that route at all.

For the record, the central bank has repeatedly protested that, even if it were to boost its activity in the bond markets, it wouldn’t amount to QE, rather it would simply be “liquidity management.” Hmmmm.

Still, there have been additional hints that it is in the cards. Last month, the People’s Republic’s powerful finance ministry publicly supported the idea of the central bank buying more government bonds. And late last month, the central bank itself came out to support the idea of trading more government securities, adding further support to the notion that QE could be on its way.

And for what it’s worth, the markets are acting like they see quantitative easing coming down the pike. Chinese government bond prices have risen, interest rates have fallen, the currency has declined — which you would expect if traders thought China’s central bank was going to print a lot more of them — and Chinese stocks have begun to rally.

In fact, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index which was down as much as 12% earlier this year, has suddenly gotten a spring in its step, and has overtaken the S&P 500 in terms of year-to-date gains.

That obviously isn’t going to fix China’s issues. But given the headaches the country’s leaders face over the economy, it could be a start, and something they’d like to see continue.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.