Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

Data center and AI energy stocks rise as Trump administration reportedly pushes for data centers to access power faster

The Trump administration is urging regulators to speed up the approval process that allows for data centers to connect to the power grid, per a Bloomberg report published late Thursday evening.

Citing a proposed rule draft that US Energy Secretary Christopher Wright sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the administration is looking to limit these reviews to 60 days. At present, such reviews can stretch on for years. “Data centers could win a speedy review if they include new power plants or agree to curtail usage in response to regional grid strain during high-demand periods such as heatwaves,” per the report.

Simply, the more roadblocks are removed from data centers being in operation, the faster a supply-constrained AI boom can realize demand. As such, adopting such a proposal could be a boon for the entire ecosystem, from data center upstarts to the fledgling power providers looking to meet the growing demand for power.

Data center companies IREN and Cipher Digital are up big in premarket trading, as are nuclear energy company Oklo and fuel cell company Bloom Energy.

Other companies identified with the AI power trade were also getting a lift, including Constellation Energy, Talen Energy, turbine-maker GE Vernova, and AI infrastructure company Vistra.

The FERC had previously rejected a request by Talen to supply an Amazon data center campus from with power from its Susquehanna nuclear plant.

Caveat: these are volatile stocks, and it’s very unclear whether this report is the catalyst for their early gains — but it certainly stands to reason that it would!

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.