Markets
Black sheep standing amongst flock of white sheep (Digital Composite)
Getty Images

There’s only one Wall Street analyst with a sell rating on Nvidia — what’s his thesis?

The poster child of the AI boom is nearing a $4 trillion market cap, and most Wall Street analysts still think there’s room for more upside. Except one.

As we’ve seen before, Wall Street analysts tend to move as a herd. Indeed, for all the constant bleating about contrarian thinking, many of the analysts at major banks and research houses tend to end up with the same conclusion about the megacap tech stocks they’re tasked with covering: that you should buy their stock.

Nvidia’s coverage is no exception. According to FactSet, there’s just one analyst, Jay Goldberg of Seaport Global Securities, who is going against the grain, with an active “sell” (or equivalent) rating on the name.

Only one analyst has a "sell" rating on Nvidia
Sherwood News

Goldberg’s $100 target price on the stock market behemoth — implying 37% downside to yesterday’s close price — is predicated on a few key pillars. In a document shared with Sherwood News, Goldberg outlined the headlines of his bearish thesis:

“Nvidia is one of the leading beneficiaries of the current AI spending boom, but its prospects are well understood and largely priced into the stock.”

According to Goldberg, there are growing questions about the actual usefulness of AI, with many of Nvidia’s customers still looking for returns from their “significant investments” in AI so far. That’s likely to mean a slowing of AI budgets in 2026.

Goldberg also wrote:

“Our research indicates significant complexity required for deployments of Nvidia systems in comparison to traditional data centers — cooling, configuration and orchestration challenges throughout the supply chain.”

On top of potential supply chain issues, he also sees a chance that Nvidia’s near monopoly position in the industry could face competition in the medium term, as the company’s top customers, like Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon build on efforts to make their own chips:

“Strong momentum behind hyperscalers’ internal Nvidia alternatives — Nvidia’s largest customers are all looking to design their own chips.”

In the nearer term, cyclical issues, including production limitations for its much sought-after Blackwell line, could raise further concerns.

Of course, there are some major “risks” to the bearish case, too. Perhaps the most important of those noted by Goldberg is that some “unforeseen advances” in AI could suddenly lead to another surge in demand. That’s a possibility that Loop Capital analysts, who have the highest price target on the street ($250), clearly think is more likely than not.

With Nvidia’s stock up more than 40% since he gave his “sell” rating in April, Goldberg hasn’t convinced enough investors to come round to his way of thinking... yet.

Related reading: 73 Wall Street analysts cover Amazon, there are 72 on Meta, and 66 write about Nvidia — how many do we need?

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

It’s still the “you gotta spend money to make money” stock market

A major theme of this year is that American companies are once again becoming major sellers of stocks.

For years, companies did the exact opposite: buying back trillions of dollars worth of shares, a practice that juiced earnings and was seen as a safe option for management teams that had run out of good-enough projects to allocate their capital to. Just look at Google, which is wiping out more than two years’ worth of buybacks with an $85 billion offering, while Meta reportedly mulls an equity raise of its own.

Now, the mantra is that investment opportunities in AI — particularly as suppliers to the arms race — are a source of future returns that are also key to sustaining higher growth. In short, capex is king, and buybacks are admitting that you don’t have enough investment opportunities that allow you to benefit from the AI boom. Raise debt, raise equity, raise anything — just make sure youre spending, and the market will reward you. A Goldman Sachs basket of companies with elevated capex relative to peers is besting stocks with the strongest buyback yields by some 30% — the most ever.

This is leading to some major divergences in accrual-based profit measures, like net income and free cash flow (which takes capex into account), for companies like Oracle.

Of course, the rest of the AI complex doesnt care whether the cash spent on the next data center was raised via debt or equity. More funding for the AI build-out is more funding for the AI build-out. Indeed, if we took capex to a bazillion dollars, that spending would still be accretive for aggregate earnings in the first year (assuming all the recipients of the capex binge were public stocks). Yes, eventually the depreciation on those assets starts to be felt and we’d normalize lower, but in the short term, it’s a boon to the stock markets bottom line.

This is why Oracle’s chart is actually just a more extreme version of the wider market; free cash flow used to be about 90% of aggregate net income, and now it’s hovering around 75%, per estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

markets

Fox to acquire Roku in $22 billion deal to create streaming and live content powerhouse

Fox said it struck a deal to buy Roku in a cash-and-stock transaction valued at about $22 billion.

The deal values Roku at $160 a share, a 34% premium to where the stock had closed before reports surfaced Friday that Roku was exploring a sale, sending shares 20% higher on Friday.

On Monday, the stock edged lower to around $140, as investors digested the risk profile and timeline of the deal. The unseasonably elevated cost of funding equity positions amid elevated issuance and growth of leveraged ETFs may also be dampening the appeal of merger arbitrage strategies.

Fox stock dropped 17%, putting it at down roughly 25% so far this year.

The deal, expected to close in the first half of calendar year 2027, will expand Fox’s digital footprint as traditional cable continues to shrink. The merger would give Fox direct access to more than 100 million streaming households globally. Once the transaction closes, existing Fox shareholders will hold a roughly 73% stake in the combined company, with Roku shareholders owning the remaining 27%.

Fox has spent the past several years building out its streaming strategy through Tubi and, more recently, FOX One, its direct-to-consumer sports and news product. Just last week, Roku added FOX One as a premium subscription inside its Roku Channel, expanding distribution ahead of the FIFA World Cup.

Roku, meanwhile, has been trying to prove it can turn its scale into consistent profits. Roku generated $613 million in ad revenue in its latest quarter, up 27% year over year.

Roku had surged during the pandemic as investors piled into streaming winners and Roku was one of the beneficiaries of the stay-at-home boom. But it has given back much of those gains.

Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch called the acquisition “a defining moment” that combines Fox’s strength in live content with Roku’s streaming scale and platform reach. “This combination will transform the scope of our company into high-growth verticals and yield a step change in our overall growth profile,” he said in the announcement.

Roku CEO Anthony Wood said the deal would help accelerate Roku’s long-term growth while maintaining its position as an open platform.

markets

Nvidia to reportedly raise at least $20 billion in first bond sale since 2021

While other tech companies are turning toward equity markets to finance their latest AI investment plans, Nvidia is reportedly about to tap the corporate bond market for the first time since 2021.

Per Bloomberg, the world’s most valuable company plans to raise at least $20 billion by selling bonds with maturities ranging from 2 to 30 years. Initial chatter has the 30-year maturities priced at a spread of roughly 90 basis points to US Treasurys.

When Nvidia last issued 30-year debt in 2021, markets were still reeling from Covid-induced lockdowns and the coupon was about 220 basis points above the rate on US 30-year government debt.

Does Nvidia need the money? Unequivocally, no. But when you can raise money through the mid-2050s at less than a percentage point above US Treasurys, I suppose you don’t say no. It’s better (and cheaper) to raise money when you don’t have to compared to when you’re in dire straits.

And of course, while there’s been some tiptoeing into stock issuance, the credit market has still been the dominant means by which megacap tech companies look to find extra cash to facilitate their AI outlays. Google, in particular, has gone on a United Nations issuance spree this year.

markets

Energy stocks follow oil lower as Strait of Hormuz set to reopen

Oil names including Occidental Petroleum, Marathon Petroleum, CF Industries, Devon Energy, Phillips 66, ConocoPhillips, Exxon, and Chevron are all ticking lower on Monday, following oil itself, after the US and Iran agreed to strike a deal to end a conflict that has pushed energy stocks up in recent months.

Alongside the countries both declaring the end of their military operations, US President Donald Trump said on Sunday that the Strait of Hormuz would be opened when the agreement is signed in Switzerland on Friday, writing on Truth Social, “Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow!

Let the oil flow?

Vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, however, remains largely unchanged since the announcement of the peace deal on Sunday, per crossing data tracked by AIS. With the exception of some smaller vessels and prearranged crossings, shipowners are likely waiting for the planned signing on Friday and further confirmation from the Iranian side before attempting transits.

Analysts at the Baltic and International Maritime Council said that they “still consider it very risking for ships to commence transits” through Hormuz, adding that they “expect it will take several weeks for all [trapped] ships to leave” in a conversation with CNN.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.