Markets
Money grab - Multiple hands clutching dollar bills
(Getty Images)
The solace of quantum

Quantum computing companies are stacking up piles of cash, capitalizing on their booming stock prices

IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, and QBTS have raised a total of ~$4.5 billion this year as the battle for commercialization heats up.

Claire Yubin Oh

Make hay while the sun is shining, or so the saying goes. And that’s exactly what America’s quantum computing companies have been doing in 2025.

Quantum cash leap

Revenues have been overrated and profits unnecessary, with quantum stocks on fire this year as investors have piled into speculative pockets of the market, helping QBTS and RGTI soar some 1,800% and 2,300%, respectively, in the past year.

Still a young, largely speculative technology, quantum stocks have swung dramatically (but mostly up) on the slightest shift in sentiment. Sometimes, there’s been an actual technological breakthrough. At other moments, rumors of a potential government endorsement, contract, or investment have been enough to send them spiking — and occasionally, good old-fashioned thin air has kept them moving higher as retail traders piled into the stocks.

For the companies themselves, a higher share price is nice, but it really has zero effect on the day-to-day operations of the firm — unless they choose to cash in by selling new shares to the public. And cash in they have, with the four main public pure-play firms — D-Wave Quantum, Rigetti Computing, Quantum Computing, and IonQ — raising more than $4.5 billion through some form of equity offering over the past year, per their press releases, including the following:

Quantum companies have been cashing in
Sherwood News

Indeed, with the exception of Rigetti Computing, which has raised the least of its peers during the past year, three out of the four quantum companies all reported a record-high cash pile in the latest quarter, giving them ample war chests to invest in the nascent technology in the pursuit of “commercialization” — or finally making some serious cash from all of these expensive hyperspeed computers, which promise the potential for breakthroughs in all kinds of fields, from engineering to biology, finance to cryptography.

At the end of Q3, D-Wave’s $836 million cash hoard outstripped that of all of its pure-play peers combined. IonQ’s fresh massive influx in early Q4 is now poised to give that company more than all its rivals combined!

The solace of quantum

Despite the hype, revenues remain negligible. Just this week, D-Wave Quantum reported revenue of just $3.7 million, with operating expenses of more than $30 million. Funding that kind of cash burn, when your operating expenses are 8x your revenue, gets a lot easier when your stock is up 1,800% in the last 12 months and you can build yourself a fortress of a balance sheet to help you weather the leaner times.

Interestingly, the race between (and beyond) the four pure-play quantum companies for commercialization — specifically to scale up hardware while solving reliability issues — is more of a battle between the different methods to achieve this common goal, whether it be using photonic (QUBT), trapped-ion (IONQ), or superconducting (RGTI, QBTS) modalities. The group is also divided in terms of the type of quantum system they’re most specialized in, with D-Wave the sole firm that’s most advanced in annealing quantum, while the others favor gate-based approaches.

Thanks to the insane ride over the last 12 months, each of those approaches should have hundreds of millions of dollars of funding available to them — even if the stock prices fade (which they have done in recent weeks).

Go Deeper: D-Wave CEO’s pitch to the Trump administration: Buy our quantum computers in exchange for an equity stake

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.