Markets
Kevin Warsh closeup
Kevin Warsh (Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

President Trump names former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh as his pick to lead the Federal Reserve

Treasury yields and the US dollar rose following reports that Warsh would be named to succeed Jerome Powell.

Luke Kawa

President Donald Trump announced in a post on Truth Social that former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh is his pick to succeed Jerome Powell as chair of the Federal Reserve.

“I have known Kevin for a long period of time, and have no doubt that he will go down as one of the GREAT Fed Chairmen, maybe the best,” he wrote. “On top of everything else, he is ‘central casting,’ and he will never let you down.”

Prediction markets began to price in decisive odds of a Warsh nomination shortly before 7 p.m. ET on Thursday evening. Trump said that his pick was “somebody that could have been there a few years ago,” and Warsh was the only member of the current shortlist who was among the president’s top options during the 2017 selection process.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Warsh was a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors from 2006 to 2011, and, if confirmed, would take up Powell’s mantle after May.

After Trump’s announcement, Senator Thom Tillis reiterated his stance that he would oppose the nomination of any official to the Federal Reserve until the Department of Justice’s investigation into Powell is “fully and transparently resolved.”

In response, Trump said at the White House on Friday that if Sen. Tillis won't allow Warsh's nomination to move forward, he will wait until Tillis is "not there," per Reuters. Tillis announced in June that he would not seek re-election and will instead retire when his current term ends in January 2027.

Warsh has argued for a smaller Federal Reserve balance sheet and lower interest rates, the latter of which was highlighted by Trump as a priority for anyone who wants to get the top job at the US central bank.

Thirty-year Treasury yields rose amid reports of Warsh’s nomination, which might be linked to his views that it is inappropriate for the Federal Reserve to own so many government bonds and mortgage-backed securities, or could reflect concerns that he will aim to juice the economy in the near term via rate cuts at the expense of longer-term inflation outcomes. This continues a pattern: Treasury yields had also risen earlier this month after Trump suggested that Kevin Hassett is better served in his current position as director of the National Economic Council, which caused traders to boost bets that Warsh would ascend to the top spot. Interestingly, the US dollar rose as well, which could indicate some skepticism about whether Warsh will be able to get buy-in for more accommodative monetary policy from his counterparts at the Fed. Amid the greenback’s rally, precious metals are getting clobbered, with gold down 5% and silver off 13% as of 5:58 a.m. ET.

That being said, federal funds futures show little change in the amount of easing priced in through 2026 compared to Thursday’s close.

The nominee has his supporters from across the political spectrum: some within the Trump administration, apparently, as well as JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and Jason Furman, chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under former President Barack Obama.

Of course, Warsh also has his detractors, who point out that his recent dovish approach to monetary policy runs contrary to what he espoused while at the central bank.

Back in 2017, Sam Bell, who would go on to become the founder of the Employ America think tank, wrote the definitive case against Warsh’s candidacy. His track record serving as Wall Street’s unofficial watchdog while at the Fed, as documented by Bell, includes:

  • Extolling the benefits of stemming from “financial innovation,” including the “dramatic growth of the derivatives markets” as well as “syndication and securitization” in March 2007.

  • Judging that inflation risks were the top worry for the economy in mid-2008.

  • In 2009, worrying that Fed purchases of government debt would drive long-term yields higher because of worries about the central bank’s credibility. (The opposite happened.)

  • Supporting fiscal consolidation in 2010 when the unemployment rate was still around double digits, while not being in favor of additional monetary stimulus, either.

However, one low-key reason why Warsh didn’t get the job last time may not have been linked to any of these views, but rather to a series of disputes between him and former Fed Governor Randal Quarles. This includes one reported incident in which Warsh, acting on behalf of the Fed, declined to accept a six-foot statue of Marriner Eccles that the family had offered to donate for display. Marriner Eccles is a former Fed chair after whom the Fed’s DC offices are named. Quarles, who is married to one of his descendants, made it known that he was against Warsh’s candidacy.

More Markets

See all Markets
Dickens, Great Expectations, He said, Aha! would you?

Tech tumbles as momentum stocks run into a blowout jobs report and a wave of profit-taking

The AI trade is under some pressure, taking prices back like... a few days. President Donald Trump is not a fan of the price action.

Trump Administration Considers Reclassifying Marijuana As A Less Dangerous Drug

Trulieve to list on NYSE, a first for US cannabis sector

More may be on the way: several other US cannabis companies have announced reverse stock splits with the intention of listing on a major exchange.

markets

Lululemon’s stretch getting tested: Stock plunges after after outlook is cut

Lululemon shares are down double digits in premarket trading after the company cut its full-year sales and profit outlook, overshadowing a Q1 beat and raising fresh concerns about the brand’s turnaround efforts.

The company now expects fiscal 2026 revenue to be flat to down 1%, compared with its prior forecast for 2% to 4% growth. Guidance for full-year diluted earnings per share was dragged down to a range of $10.95 to $11.15, below the company’s previous guidance of $12.10 to $12.30 and well below Wall Street’s estimate of $13.26.

Key numbers for Q1:

  • EPS of $1.69 vs. the $1.68 expected.

  • Revenue of $2.47 billion vs. the $2.43 billion expected.

The modest top-line beat masked a widening divergence between Lululemons geographic markets. While international revenue rose 22% overall with a 30% increase in Mainland China, the bigger problem remains North America, where revenue fell 5%.

Interim co-CEO and CFO Meghan Frank acknowledged during the earnings call that recent product rollouts underperformed. A highly anticipated yoga campaign failed to generate its expected halo effect across broader product lines.

Profitability metrics took a major hit, with gross margins contracting by 410 basis points to 54.2% due to mounting tariff costs and promotional markdowns. Operating income consequently fell 37% year over year to $276.9 million.

“We experienced spikes of negative commentary in the media and on social channels with regard to our brand, which had an impact on traffic and overall top-line performance,” Frank said during the earnings call. “And second, not all of our product launches have met our expectations. While we have had several successful launches so far this year, we have seen others as we start Q2 not generate the anticipated guest response.”

Lululemons valuation has already been steadily compressing for years. While it was once one of retails richly valued stocks, investors have been questioning whether the company can return to the double-digit growth era.

The results also arrive during a leadership transition. Lululemon announced back in April that former Nike executive Heidi ONeill is set to take over as CEO in September, with investors looking to her to revive growth in North America and restore the brands growth.

As Lululemon faces both macroeconomic pressure and brand-specific challenges, its stock has dropped around 40% year to date.

markets

US job growth skyrocketed in May, blasting past expectations

The US economy added 172,000 jobs in the month of May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday, sending 10-year Treasury yields higher.

The strong May job market surprised economists. Experts had predicted only 85,000 new jobs — just half the reported number. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as expected.

The job growth story is a hopeful spot for the economy as consumers continue to feel inflationary pressure from the Iran war.

Job gains were buoyed by the leisure and hospitality sector, which added 70,000 jobs, as well as local government, healthcare, and education.

Both the March and April jobs reports were revised upward, making them collectively 93,000 higher than previously reported.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.